Trade in your item
Get a $2.00
Gift Card.
Have one to sell? Sell on Amazon
Flip to back Flip to front
Listen Playing... Paused   You're listening to a sample of the Audible audio edition.
Learn more
See this image

Food for Thought: The Debate over Eating Meat (Contemporary Issues (Prometheus)) Paperback – May 1, 2004


Amazon Price New from Used from
Paperback
"Please retry"
$15.26 $14.35

NO_CONTENT_IN_FEATURE

Best Books of the Month
Best Books of the Month
Want to know our Editors' picks for the best books of the month? Browse Best Books of the Month, featuring our favorite new books in more than a dozen categories.

Product Details

  • Series: Contemporary Issues (Prometheus)
  • Paperback: 386 pages
  • Publisher: Prometheus Books (May 1, 2004)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 1591021189
  • ISBN-13: 978-1591021186
  • Product Dimensions: 9 x 6.1 x 0.8 inches
  • Shipping Weight: 1.2 pounds
  • Average Customer Review: 5.0 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (3 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #492,191 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

Editorial Reviews

About the Author

Steve F. Sapontzis (Ft. Bragg, CA), now retired, was professor of philosophy at California State University for over 25 years. He is the author of Morals, Reason, and Animals, and numerous articles on animal rights.

More About the Author

Discover books, learn about writers, read author blogs, and more.

Customer Reviews

5.0 out of 5 stars
5 star
3
4 star
0
3 star
0
2 star
0
1 star
0
See all 3 customer reviews
Share your thoughts with other customers

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

6 of 6 people found the following review helpful By Daniel Hicks on February 20, 2012
Format: Paperback
I'm an academic, and I originally picked up this anthology for possible use in a class I'm teaching on philosophical issues surrounding food. Vegetarianism has become a very common applied ethics issue, and there are numerous textbooks, anthologies, and books by single authors available. When I was evaluating books, I took the following things into account:
(1) Since this book would be for a class, I wanted something that presented a variety of perspectives.
(2) Since I'm a philosopher, I care a lot about good arguments and clear writing.
(3) And since the class would be focused on food, I didn't want something that spent too much time on issues like animals in research or zoos. Similarly, the arguments against vegetarianism shouldn't just be against more general notions, like animal rights.
(4) I also care about the amount of money my students have to pay for their textbooks. $100+ for a collection of articles published elsewhere is, I think, extortionate. This is especially important since I'm going to use the book for just a few weeks in a more general class; I would hate for my students to pay a lot of money for something that's only used briefly.

This particular book is excellent in all four respects.

(1) The book comprises 29 essays and an introduction by the editor, organized into 7 sections, on topics ranging from nutrition to religion to feminism and multiculturalism. Each essay is about 10 pages long. 11 (35%) of the 32 authors are women, which may not sound great until your realize that only about 20% of professional philosophers are women. In terms of number of essays, the book does lean notably towards the pro-vegetarian side of the debate.
Read more ›
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
2 of 3 people found the following review helpful By Frank Barker on November 28, 2011
Format: Paperback Verified Purchase
Wonderful, dense, philosophical discussions for the conscious foodie. My mind opened and closed, decided, changed it's mind, turned inside out, flipped several times and is decidedly enriched by this tome.
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Format: Paperback Verified Purchase
Unlike many other "well-balanced" collections of pro/con essays published by Prometheus, this one is fairly much weighted toward the pro-vegetarian/vegan; however, it presents an interesting variety of different viewpoints WITHIN this side of the debate. Essays by some of the "big names" are included, such as Peter Singer, Tom Regan, Andrew Linzey, and Carol J. Adams.

One essayist notes that "even in people who define themselves as atheists, vegetarianism may retain the character of an absolute imperative, a prophylactic against pollution that has all the marks of pious observance." (Pg. 81) He later answers the question of "why life should be sacrificed, just for this?" by replying, "the life that is sacrificed would not exist, but for the sacrifice." (Pg. 90)

Another essayist argues that "There can be no moral objection to mutually beneficial, ecologically responsible human-nonhuman relationships. Milk and eggs can be exchanged for shelter, food, and care. I know a number of people living on 'no kill' farms who treat their chickens, cows, and goats with respect and warmth." (Pg. 96)

Still another notes that "in view of the inevitable increase in the cost of meat and meat products that would be entailed by the far-reaching reforms needed in agricultural practices, it seems inevitable, though unfair, that the poor will carry the heaviest burden. Social conscience has its costs. If needed reforms were to be implemented, they would end the age of the cheap hamburger meal." (Pg. 322)

This book has an unusually wide variety of arguments and a broad range of discussion, and will be of considerable value to persons on all sides of the various issues.
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again

What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?