Inside this manual you will find routine maintenance, tune-up procedures, engine repair, cooling and heating, air conditioning, fuel and exhaust, emissions control, ignition, brakes, suspension and steering, electrical systems, and wiring diagrams.
| ||||||||||||
Product Details
Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
|
|
Share your thoughts with other customers:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
32 of 32 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Good Novice Automotive Help,
By
This review is from: Ford Ranger & Bronco II '83'92 (Haynes Manuals) (Paperback)
After reading the reviews posted on Amazon for the Chilton's book for the Bronco II, I decided to try this Hayne's book instead. I was glad I did. I found the detail diagrams insightful and the explanations easy to follow. I have done some minor automotive repairs and maintenance on my own in the past (replacing starters, alternators, changing oil), and I found the level of this book easy to follow and useful for some more challenging maintenance I needed to work on.
14 of 15 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars
Not For Electrical Problems,
By
Amazon Verified Purchase(What's this?)
This review is from: Ford Ranger & Bronco II '83'92 (Haynes Manuals) (Paperback)
For anyone hoping to find good electrical schematics, this is not the right book. I cannot trace the horn circuit, for example. In addition, I have a failed gas gauge. There is nothing in the book that discusses how to fix this problem. As with some other books, there is a lot of info on how to completely overhaul an engine - but not enough on more minor repairs.
6 of 7 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
If you only have one, get this one...,
By
This review is from: Ford Ranger & Bronco II '83'92 (Haynes Manuals) (Paperback)
I also own both this and the analogous Chilton manual and I have to say that the Haynes is by far the more accessible: The drawings and photographs are clearer, the instructions are better written, and the seperation of the information regarding the different engines is better. Also, the general maintenance (oil change, lube, and tune up) information is much better.The Chilton manual, on the other hand, has extensive tables of torque listings, includes Ford part numbers in the drawings, and has factory-style detail regarding the catalyst. On balance, these two are complementary. Unfortunately, not even both of these in concert are exhaustive: there are simply some details that are not covered. If anyone has a better manual please let me know. Regarding the electircal schematics comment from previous: Disclaimer: I have not yet used either manual for a major job.
Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
|
|
Tags Customers Associate with This Product(What's this?)Click on a tag to find related items, discussions, and people.
|