Man alive, it kills me to have to give this review. Mr. Robinson is one of the most talented writers of thinking-person's SciFi currently working. He writes really good stuff. He has never been known for bang-zoom, action every three pages, laserbeams and killer robot stories, but for more cerebral settings of scenes and intricate, believable characters. His "Antarctica" and the California quasi-trilogy are examples of books that don't contain a whole lot of "action" per se, but are excellent reads nonetheless. I love phasers and photon torpedoes as much as the next geek, but Robinson has consistently delivered when it comes to satisfying and highly readable SciFi of a more relaxed, thoughtful nature. His Mars trilogy, which contains a few examples of what could be considered literary tedium (multi-page descriptions of what a rock outcropping looks like, an excessive fondness for the word "glossolalia"), is still far and away my favorite series from any author.
I've noticed that most of the negative reviews so far seem to be coming from my same frame of mind. That is, trying to rationalize Forty Signs of Rain (henceforth FSOR). Trying to find a way to defend it. No one seems eager to dismiss this book, and why should we be? We admire this writer and his work and have been eagerly anticipating this book. Nobody likes to be disappointed.
So what went wrong? I wish I knew. It is easy to say that in this book, not a lot happens (because not a lot does). But that seems unfair, too easy, too general. Not a lot "happens" in "The Gold Coast" but it's still a very enjoyable book. Much of FSOR centers around the travails of parents raising children - taking sons to the park, packing lunches, adult banter about children. It's easy to say that what is wrong here is that as I have no children, I can't as a reader identify with these characters. But that's a bullhockey (that is, logically inconsistent) criticism, because I may not be a drugged-out ex-astronaut or an awkward polymath scientist but I can still identify with his characters John Boone and Sax Russell. Because KSR is a good writer. Those characters are well written.
Again, what's the problem? This question is vexing me, because I can't put my finger on the answer. Read any given page of FSOR and it's quality writing. There's a few moments of brilliance. His use of game theory and prisoner's dilemma as applied to driving - particularly the way he contrasts east coast and west coast drivers - genius. That passage in particular made me think "That's great! Why didn't I think of that?"
I guess it's just that this novel is not about what it purports to be about. I should hasten to add that there is no deliberate deception on the part of the author in that regard. I honestly believe KSR was trying to craft as best he could a gripping set-up to an extended story of vast climate change. Unfortunately, that is not what he delivered. We get 350-odd pages, the first 320 or so of which are phone calls, meetings, changing diapers, the accurate description of what takes place in the research lab of an under-funded biotech start-up (which is very little), and a smattering of data tidbits about the environment and primate sociology in pre-chapter italicized asides. Only in the last 25-some pages do we get any Mother-Earth-gone-wrong action. And even then, it's... meh. Washington, D.C. is hit with two days of hard rain coupled with very high tides, causing portions of the city to get covered in water up to your knees. People get stuck in offices. Animals are released from the zoo so they won't drown. Then the rain stops. That's about it. Sorry for the spoiler, but it's the only way I can express what I felt made this book sink or swim, pun intended.
Is my complaint that this book is too... realistic? Perhaps so. It's certainly not straight-SciFi in the traditional sense. Not that there's anything wrong with that. If I may compare and contrast, everything that was wrong with the movie "Day After Tomorrow" is what is NOT wrong with this book. OK, that's awkward. Let me rephrase. Where "Day After Tomorrow" went much too far, FSOR does not go far enough. I'm willing to suspend disbelief enough for a gripping story. Is it a fair criticism to say that it's TOO believable?
Readers of KSR's Mars trilogy (actually four books if you count "The Martians") will remember the abrupt climate change that takes place on Earth in the second book. It seems Mr. Robinson has taken that idea and decided to expand and explore it, and kudos to him for doing so. This first book of his new effort just needed a little - no, a lot - more "ooomph."
Here's hoping for more and better in the future. I really do have great hope for this series. Rapid climate change is a fascinating topic, a very real danger to which we as readers can relate. In the capable hands of a writer of Robinson's skill, this could be a very enjoyable and memorable series. Hopefully he won't confine it to a trilogy. Four or even five books would be awesome.
Mr. Robinson, get a nice cup of coffee, go back to the drawing board (or laptop), and more or less start over with Book #2 of the series. It'd be great if FSOR is to the remaining as-yet-unwritten books what "The Hobbit" was to the "Lord of the Rings" trilogy. And since Mr. Robinson resides in a community whose verdant avenues are all named after people and places from Tolkien, he should take heart.
Time to wrap this up. Short and sweet, I'm not. 3 stars, E for effort but a C+ overall, needs improvement. Known to be capable of much better work.
Suggestions -
1) Mr. Robinson, sit down at the laptop and kick ass. We all know you can. Blow our socks off with part deux. Try to put from your mind all worries of Davis politics (the proposed development south of Russell Boulevard, the Federal BioContainment Facility, the de-bohemianization of the E Street Cafe Roma) and concentrate on the novels. Publish before Ashcroft deems your books to be subversive. :)
2) Some constructive criticism, to wit: Your hard science is great and spot-on, as always. No doubt you'll keep it up. Plenty of new material to work with, such as the sudden and unexplained increase of CO2 in the last two years, over and above the normal rate of increase, as recently reported by the Mauna Loa observing facility (which would have been front page news if Hawaiian atmospheric scientists ruled the world, and God willing one day they will).
3) When you have finished writing these books, run for office in California. Seriously. Too many actors and not enough writers have governed our Golden State. Myself and many others would campaign tirelessly for you. Give it some thought.
Hope this review didn't come off as harsh, that wasn't my intention. Keep up the great work. Do greater.
Take care and all the best, Ted