Buy New

or
Sign in to turn on 1-Click ordering.
or
Amazon Prime Free Trial required. Sign up when you check out. Learn More
Buy Used
Used - Good See details
$6.68 & eligible for FREE Super Saver Shipping on orders over $25. Details

or
Sign in to turn on 1-Click ordering.
 
   
Sell Back Your Copy
For a $1.82 Gift Card
Trade in
More Buying Choices
Have one to sell? Sell yours here
Four Dead in Ohio: Was There a Conspiracy at Kent State
 
See larger image
 
Tell the Publisher!
I'd like to read this book on Kindle

Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.

Four Dead in Ohio: Was There a Conspiracy at Kent State [Paperback]

William A. Gordon (Author)
4.2 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (8 customer reviews)

Price: $15.95 & eligible for FREE Super Saver Shipping on orders over $25. Details
o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o
In Stock.
Ships from and sold by Amazon.com. Gift-wrap available.
Only 13 left in stock--order soon (more on the way).
Want it delivered Monday, January 30? Choose One-Day Shipping at checkout. Details

Book Description

March 1, 1995
Four Dead in Ohio is the first major reappraisal of the May 4, 1970 killings of four students at Kent State. The book is based on a 19-year investigation by William A. Gordon, a 1973 KSU graduate and an author whose relentless pursuit of answers earned him the reputation of being "the Boswell of Kent State."

During his investigation, Gordon conducted over 200 formal interviews and spoke informally with each of the eight Ohio National Guardsmen who were criminally prosecuted, as well as many other key players in the drama (students, professors, White House and Justice Department officials, attorneys representing the various parties, the parents of the slain students, and various law enforcement officials).

Gordon also attended the two major trials and unearthed both official and private documents in the archives at Yale, Kent State, the Ohio Historical Society, and the Nixon archives. The book also draws on the FBI's 8,000-page investigative file and other government records released under the Freedom of Information Act.

Four Dead in Ohio re-examines the many different theories advanced for the shootings, as well as other unsolved mysteries of May 4.

Gordon concluded:

1. There was no conspiracy among the enlisted Guardsmen, but there was probably a localized order to fire issued by one of the officers at the scene.

2. The Justice Department tried to convince a federal grand jury to indict the Guardsmen on conspiracy charges, but the grand jurors balked. Instead, the soldiers were charged with violating the victims' rights to due process. (They were subsequently acquitted by a federal judge.)

3. FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover felt the victims deserved to be shot.

4. Hoover eagerly followed President Nixon's instructions to discredit accurate news reports that the shootings were unnecessary and the Guardsmen could be criminally charged.

5. Both the FBI and campus police covered up the actions of Terry Norman, a part-time Kent State student and undercover photographer who was initially suspected of firing the first shot.

6. The university prevented the public from learning that six of its police officers approached KSU administrators and alleged that their police chief was too drunk during the R.O.T.C. fire on May 2, 1970 to stop the arsonists. A subsequent university investigation determined that the fire could have been easily prevented if the police had done their job.

The book also raises questions about why:

1. No student or Guardsmen indicted by the grand juries ever spent a day in jail as a result of the various criminal proceedings;

2. Several soldiers removed their identifying name tags;

3. A high school student, George Walter Harrington, who admitted to the FBI that he played an important role in the R.O.T.C. fire, was never prosecuted nor publicly identified before now;

4. The Nixon White House insisted on closely monitoring the progress of the FBI's investigation;

5. A student named Robert Freeman, who FBI files suggest was hit by shrapnel, was never identified as a possible 14th victim of the tragedy; and

6. A well-known sociology professor, just days after championing Kent State's few remaining radicals, did a bizarre 180 degree political turnaround and became an informant against the families of those killed.


Frequently Bought Together

Customers buy this book with Kent State: The Day the War Came Home $25.00

Four Dead in Ohio: Was There a Conspiracy at Kent State + Kent State: The Day the War Came Home
  • This item: Four Dead in Ohio: Was There a Conspiracy at Kent State

    In Stock.
    Ships from and sold by Amazon.com.
    Eligible for FREE Super Saver Shipping on orders over $25. Details

  • Kent State: The Day the War Came Home

    In Stock.
    Sold by Single Spark Pictures and ships from Amazon Fulfillment.
    This item ships for FREE with Super Saver Shipping. Details



Editorial Reviews

From Publishers Weekly

Revised for the 25th anniversary of the Kent State murders, Gordon's book probes for the answers behind the May 4, 1970, slaying of four students by National Guardsmen during an anti-Vietnam War demonstration.
Copyright 1995 Reed Business Information, Inc.

Review

A compelling, highly readable analysis of the shooting, the cover-ups that followed, and the complex legal battles that surrounded the 1970 killings of four students by National Guardsmen at Kent State . . . Gordon systematically addresses the major unresolved questions of who did what and why in a manner that brings more clarity to this controversial historical tragedy than any other work to date . . . reads like a whodunit . . . As entertaining as the best detective fiction and as analytical and well documented as the best journalism or scholarship. -- Choice magazine

Balanced and thorough--and as close to the last word as anyone has come so far. -- Unsolved Mysteries of American History by Paul Aron

Product Details

  • Paperback: 301 pages
  • Publisher: North Ridge Books; 1st ed edition (March 1, 1995)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 0937813052
  • ISBN-13: 978-0937813058
  • Product Dimensions: 9 x 6.1 x 0.8 inches
  • Shipping Weight: 1.1 pounds (View shipping rates and policies)
  • Average Customer Review: 4.2 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (8 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #212,205 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

More About the Author

Discover books, learn about writers, read author blogs, and more.

 

Customer Reviews

8 Reviews
5 star:
 (2)
4 star:
 (6)
3 star:    (0)
2 star:    (0)
1 star:    (0)
 
 
 
 
 
Average Customer Review
4.2 out of 5 stars (8 customer reviews)
 
 
 
 
Share your thoughts with other customers:
Most Helpful Customer Reviews

14 of 14 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars Author corrects GrinAlltheWay's review, July 11, 2006
By 
William A. Gordon (Laguna Hills, CA USA) - See all my reviews
(REAL NAME)   
This review is from: Four Dead in Ohio: Was There a Conspiracy at Kent State (Paperback)
Although GrinAlltheWay wrote a mostly positive review of my book, he misreprented the primary conclusion I reached, and made some gaping leaps of logic.

First, Grin claimed I did not answer the question: "Was there a conspiracy at Kent State?" Actually, my chapter on the shootings re-examined Peter Davies' argument that there was such a conspiracy existed, and on page 63 I argued there probably was not a conspiracy. The noise level and the limited amount of time the Guardsmen had to converse amongst themselves were two of the reasons I doubted the enlisted men could have decided to shoot the students.

From there I re-examined a similar question: "Could an order to fire been issued by one of the commanding officers on the scene?" Drawing on new testimony produced by the trials, including some pretty damning grand jury transcripts that were read into the record but never shown to the jurors, I weighed the claims made by various eyewitnesses to the shootings. Some of the witnesses suggested the order to fire was given by Sergeant Myron J. Pryor, who, according to two former soldier eyewitnesses, allegedly tapped the three or four Guardsmen closest to him and pointed to designated targets. Others thought they saw Major Harry Jones make a motioning signal before the Guardsmen turned and fired. Jones was basically directing traffic with a baton that, in violation of Guard regulations, was not standard Guard equipment.

Even though there were more witnesses against Jones, and Jones was less than forthcoming under oath, I pointed out several reasons to give him the benefit (such as one Guardsman's story that Jones was angry at the shooters). The accusations against Pryor made much more sense to me, and I hinted that he was the most likely candidate to have given a localized order to fire.

Secondly, I was taken aback by Grin's claim that I used a diagram that was not to scale and which gave a distorted picture of the scene. His claim makes no sense. The diagram was originally published in the Akron Beacon Journal and it accurately reconstructs the Guardsmen's movements and the distances between the victims and the firing line. The Guardsmen are all pointed in the right direction, and the buildings are all basically in the right places, so I have no idea why Grin (whoever he is) would make such a vague, fuzzy and unsubstantiated claim.

What irritated me the most, though, was Grin's suggestion that my decision to reprint the Beacon Journal's diagram somehow raises a question about the overall reliability of my research. Even if there was any merit to Grin's argument, to jump from a diagram to a sweeping claim about the overall reliability of my book is a non sequitur. It is also utter, utter nonsense.

One of the things I am most proud of is that in the 16 years since my book was published, no one--not a single journalist, scholar, or groupie--has been able to identify any errors of fact (either significant or nitpicking).

People may disagree with the conclusions I reached, but no one can honestly say I misquoted anyone, got basic facts wrong, or was less than conscientious with the material at hand.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


13 of 14 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars Who Shot the Kent State students? Revealed in this Book!, May 16, 2000
This review is from: Four Dead in Ohio: Was There a Conspiracy at Kent State (Paperback)
Alright, we all know that it was the national guardsmen, but who gave the fatal order to fire?! This is one of the best books on the subject, and believe me, I've been looking at them all recently. Michener's book was comprehensive, but may have come out too soon. Davies' book was too conspiracy minded, but did move the case onto the front burner. Aided by the longer view of history and time to reflect, study and learn, this book gives adequate coverage of all time periods... pre-riot, attitudes, facts, photos, aftermath, trials, settlements, and probable motives and suspects. I found Gordon's writing very accessable, a mixture of human emotion and factual account, challenging testimony and statement in the light of subsequent testimony and further research. By far, the most comprehensive look at what happened and why... and pulls no punches when it lays out who was at fault and why. I tend to agree with his conclusions, though author Gordon admits that we will never truely know until one or more of the National Guardsmen steps forward and tells his/their story. And that will narrow the field of suspects even more. Perhaps that is why they agreed among themselves not to speak. They don't have to.... only time, (and these books) will tell!

One or two concerns with this book: The map on the inside cover has a differing location of the various victims than other books. In fact, photographs SHOW different figures laying or falling in different spots. (In fact, many of the books differ between themselves on where the four fell. I don't understand how and why this happened yet....)

I also enjoyed Davis' book alot, as it has SO MANY photos.. I find I flip back and forth to Davis' book to cross check things.
As with other books that were published earlier, the Kent State story continues to unfold... see other reviewers for further developments that have happened since publication. Perhaps another edition with updates and corrections is in order:

**This book is criticized by some "who were there," as it does not promote their agenda. (But then everyone has attempted to spin May Fourth to their advantage.) If there are factual errors, I did not spot them on the first reading. I enjoyed this book, despite the criticism. But, perhaps the best view is gained by reading MANY authors and MANY points of view. That's why I continue to seek them out...and to question their points of view with people who were on campus then. Inquire, reflect, learn.

I know I did. And I'm still searching out others....

Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


12 of 14 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars This hits home for me as a KSU student, May 13, 2000
This review is from: Four Dead in Ohio: Was There a Conspiracy at Kent State (Paperback)
Yesterday I picked up this book at the Kent State bookstore as I finished out the semester. I had seen this one before, and it looked good. Even though I haven't completely finished the book yet, I can say already that it is something special. Gordon presents many facts, interviews, and testimonials that make you wonder if there really was a conspiracy at Kent State. I don't think it's false information that he's giving. Alot of it makes you wonder what happened. At the beginning of the book however, Gordon bad-mouths Kent State for not commemorating the 4 students that were killed. Yes, they did dedicate a memorial to the "event" of May 4th, but since being published in 1995, the university has dedicated a number of memorials to the 4 students, including blocking off 4 parking spaces where the students were shot. All in all, this is an excellent book.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No

Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
 
 
 
Most Recent Customer Reviews






Only search this product's reviews



What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?


Tags Customers Associate with This Product

 (What's this?)
Click on a tag to find related items, discussions, and people.
 

Your tags: Add your first tag
 

Sell a Digital Version of This Book in the Kindle Store

If you are a publisher or author and hold the digital rights to a book, you can sell a digital version of it in our Kindle Store. Learn more

Customer Discussions

This product's forum
Discussion Replies Latest Post
No discussions yet

Ask questions, Share opinions, Gain insight
Start a new discussion
Topic:
First post:
Prompts for sign-in
 


Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
Search all Amazon discussions
   
Related forums





Look for Similar Items by Category


Look for Similar Items by Subject