Product Details
Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
|
|
Share your thoughts with other customers:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
42 of 47 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Hands down the best book on finance I have ever read.,
By A Customer
This review is from: Fractal Market Analysis: Applying Chaos Theory to Investment and Economics (Hardcover)
Reviewed by Michael P. Corning Edgar E. Peters wasn't satisfied with the Efficient Market Hypothesis (EMH). With the publication of his first book, Chaos and Order in Capital Markets, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1991, he went public with his concerns about its underlying assumptions and with its empirical shortcomings. That book, a manifesto really, was followed last year by Fractal Market Analysis: Applying Chaos Theory to Investment & Economics (FMA). Where his first book broke ground, FMA has laid the foundation of a new conceptual infrastructure of capital markets.
Risk From The Past Peters offers the Stable-Levy, or fractal, frequency distribution as a more faithful representation of capital markets. When two key variables are fixed at certain levels, the normal distribution becomes a special case of fractal distributions. To hear that the random walk is a special case should be no more surprising than to hear that visible light is a special case of the electromagnetic spectrum. It is not so much a matter of losing something; instead, vast amounts of knowledge remain invisible as long as the old assumption remains intact and tools tuned to the different frequencies remain undeveloped. Instruments tuned to gamma, X-ray, infrared, and radio frequencies have shown astronomers far more about our universe than the special case of visible light ever could.
Both these facts, that finance time series are not random and that the Gaussian assumption is a special case of fractal distributions, suggest that:
Risk in the Present In Peters' view, investors don't struggle against each other trying to attain an above average rate of return (at the expense of the seller) as much as they sustain each other and diversify each other's risk by keeping the market liquid. As long as long-term investors remain long-term investors, they are willing to step in and buy securities that are unwanted by traders on shorter investment horizons.
Risk of the Future The EMH finds itself in a similar predicament. As long as it clings to its simplifying assumptions like a jealous lover, it will never be able to explain why crashes and stampedes happen. The FMH, on the other hand, not explains why, it begins to construct a world view which explains how they happen, as well. In the long term, Peters conjectures, capital markets behave like nonlinear dynamic systems. Their time series have all the requisite attributes; among them, sensitivity to initial conditions, and a fractal dimension. In addition, through the use of R/S analysis, Peters can identify the nonperiodic cycles, known in chaos theory as attractors, so characteristic of chaotic systems. It may be this latter feature that will have the greatest impact on our understanding of risk and our techniques to minimize it. Though he does not explicitly suggest it in Fractal Market Analysis, he has speculated in earlier papers that sufficient understanding of the nonlinear dynamics of capital markets may provide a theoretic basis for market timing and tactical asset allocation.
Final Thoughts First, we risk making two types of errors when faced with a new and provocative world view. Type I: We too quickly appropriate a new idea or theory. Type II: We too quickly dismiss a new idea or theory. With Type I errors we agree without understanding; with Type II: we disagree without appreciating. The former is naive, the latter is insolent. With Type I errors we are not fully utilizing our critical faculties; with Type II errors we are forgetting our intuitive. Ignorance is non-market risk. We have an obligation to our clients to diversify it away, and the best way to do that is with an open and critical mind. Finally, at the risk of overstating it, I would have to describe both of Peters' books as inspired. I say that because they not only informed me, they enlightened me. They changed the way I see the world, and they affected me at an emotional level. I have never before encountered a book at once so intellectually demanding and accessible. For me, the measure of a great book is taken in the number of times I return to it and the degree of new understanding each reading yields for me. In my library, Peters has few peers. Readers interested in a more in-depth discussion of Fractal Market Analysis can find it on the World Wide Web at http://www.oara.org/mpc/fma/. Michael P. Corning is the Quality Assurance Officer at Chuck Jones & Associates, Inc., Portland, Oregon. The opinions expressed in this review are his alone and not necessarily those of Chuck Jones & Associates, Inc. This review was taken from a complete review first published in the Journal of Financial Planning, October, 1995
50 of 59 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars
Superficial, mystical, factually incorrect at times.,
By A Customer
This review is from: Fractal Market Analysis: Applying Chaos Theory to Investment and Economics (Hardcover)
I am very disappointed with this book. In spite of the trendy words "fractal" and "chaos" the field of nonlinear dynamical systems is not new, and this book is reminiscent of a cursory overview of an advanced undergraduate mathematics class in time series analysis. The book also contains statements which are simply untrue. For example (p.19) The author claims that "Upon discovering this 'statistical memory' (inherent in a game of single-deck blackjack), casinos responded by using multiple decks, ... thus eliminating the memory". This is simply wrong, the statistical memory still exists in multiple-deck blackjack, and is exploited by blackjack players every day. Even worse, the "Fractal Market Hypothesis" itself is stated in such a general and ill-defined manner that you may be left wondering what exactly the hypothesis is. There are certainly problems with the traditional efficient market hypothesis, but this is no excuse for mystical hand-waving about "fractals". The useful information in the book could be written in a pamphlet of a few pages at most. Good luck.
31 of 36 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
Almost useless,
By A Customer
This review is from: Fractal Market Analysis: Applying Chaos Theory to Investment and Economics (Hardcover)
In this book, Peters explains general capital market in an interesting way; but when he gets into the Fractals - the main theme of the book, he seems to just pick things up from previous research papers and condenses them. At the end of the day you will be wondering if it is worthwhile to purchase and read the book after all.On the editing side, I think Wiley could have done better. The math in the book is typeset in a programming language style and you have to give extra effort in order to read them. The three stars is for being one of the very few works available in this field.
Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
|
|
Tags Customers Associate with This Product(What's this?)Click on a tag to find related items, discussions, and people.
|
|
This product's forum
Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
|
Related forums
|