28 of 35 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars
Ron Shipp Did It? Puh-leese!, December 5, 2000
By A Customer
This review is from: The Frame of the Century? (Paperback)
To buy the conclusions in this book you have to believe that ex-LA cop Ron Shipp is some kind of combination of James Bond, Mr. Wizard, and Professor Moriarity. Whipping up fake blood genetically identical to OJ's at home in order to plant false evidence? I ask you.
Plus in order to bring off the trick he'd have to own a working crystal ball and a Ouija board, to know before it happened that OJ would cut his finger the next morning, to know that OJ wouldn't have an iron-clad alibi at the moment itself, to arrange the hundreds of random events that surround any place and time.
Here's a scenario that takes into account all the fact that Schulman uses, but doesn't toss away Occam's razor:
OJ kills Nichole and Ron. He cuts his finger, drips blood, is late for his limo, the whole thing. From the airport he calls his good friend Ron, under the theory that "Friends help you move; good friends help you move bodies." He makes his "I dreamed I did something bad to Nichole" comment.
Ron, though, isn't _that_ good a friend. The farthest he's willing to go is promising that he won't tell anyone about this phone call. He drives by Nichole's house, and his worst fears are realized: there are bodies lying on the ground. He's not going to call the cops himself; he's that good a friend, and he doesn't need the hassle. But he doesn't know about the trail of blood, either. Having been a cop himself, he doesn't have a lot of confidence in their finding evidence. So he picks up one of two gloves he finds on scene, drives over to OJ's house, and throws the glove over the fence.
Next morning, he calls OJ's house, and the cops pick up the phone. He's satisfied that they'll get the murderer. Later, he lies about when he first learned of Nichole's murder.
Okay, that covers all the points Schulman raises, and doesn't require ESP, phenominal luck, and skills beyond the ability mortal man to carry off.
And know what? It still leaves OJ guilty, despite Schulman's wishful thinking.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
2 of 3 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars
If he didn't do it, December 11, 2010
This review is from: The Frame of the Century? (Paperback)
Schulman is good fiction writer and, in this book, an uneven logician. It's bad if he believes his thesis...perhaps even worse if he's playing devil's advocate at this length just as an exercise in contrarianism. A woman was murdered and many of the friends and family of the murder victim are still around.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
11 of 17 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
If you have a wild imagination......, August 25, 2000
This review is from: The Frame of the Century? (Paperback)
The book was an okay read but you really had to stretch your imagination. I believe some of the facts Mr Shulman dug up are more than coincidence, but I just don't buy it. If you've read all the other books for thier point of view, this is probably worth a read.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No