Most Helpful Customer Reviews
8 of 9 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
Competent, kind of dull, May 22, 2002
This review is from: France, the United States, and the Algerian War (Hardcover)
Irwin Wall's book on American relations with France during the Algerian war of independence is a sequel to his book on how America supported (and manipulated) France during the Fourth Republic. It is not as interesting as that book, but it provides a workmanlike overview of the problem. It shows the Eisenhower Administration in its best light (it has much less to say about Kennedy). Overall Eisenhower was an intelligent man, much more so than was thought at the time, and he was personally decent, in striking contrast to most of his successors. But his administration was deeply unimaginative and unsympathetic and his Secretary of State, John Foster Dulles, was extremely narro-minded and dogmatic, very bad qualities for a diplomat. Notwithstanding these problems, the Americans soon realized that the French could not suppress the FLN and that ultimately autonomy and independence were inevitable. Here Eisenhower and Dulles are in their best light, tactfully offering advice to a French government that will not lessen, not (for once) being hoodwinked by the claims of the French to be fighting communism, and making their own contacts with the FLN. They are properly angry over the British-French-Israeli aggression at Suez, and understandably disturbed over the French attack on Sakiet, Tunisia, where it is not clear whether the army or the government is in control. Given the unreliability of the government they decide that it would not be that bad an idea for De Gaulle to take power and inaugurate the fifth French Republic. Much of this book narrowly reads the available diplomatic materials and often reads as a paraphrase of rather inconclusive discussions between the Americans, the French and the British on such questions as Algeria, trying to revamp NATO to increase French power (unsuccessfully), and the question of a French nuclear deterrent. Wall does have an important new thesis: in contrast to the hagiography around De Gaulle, he argues that the president did not in fact plan in 1958 to eventually give Algeria independence, but in fact wanted to keep it as French as possible. Unfortunately for the reader, the book is more than half over by the time he encounters this. The thesis is interesting and is certainly plausible; De Gaulle did appear to wish to cover Algeria in new euphemisms for dependence. And if true, it would mean that De Gaulle prolonged the war with worse results than if the government had stared down the military rebels in 1958. Still it is not definitive, since De Gaulle spoke different things to different people. Wall's verdict on De Gaulle's foreign policy is largely negative, since he achieved very little. Wall does make the interesting comment that by concentrating on the prestige item of nuclear weapons, De Gaulle failed to modernize conventional forces which would have made France more effective in a post cold-war Europe. One problem with this book is that Wall is somewhat repetitive. Another, and more serious problem, is that one learns relatively little about the partner in America's negotiations. The contrast with Walter Lafeber's The Clash on Japan, or Piero Gleijeses' Shattered Hope on Guatemala, or Neil Sheehan's A Bright Shining Lie on Vietnam is striking. There is some interesting information on France; there is much less, however on Algeria itself.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
2 of 2 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
The International Angles of an Insurgency, February 6, 2007
This review is from: France, the United States, and the Algerian War (Hardcover)
Professor Wall's book is not so much about the Algerian national struggle against France, per se. Indeed, the Algerian National Liberation Front receives only passing attention in the book. (If you want a book on the Algerian insurgency, I recommend of course Alistair Horne's book.) Rather, Wall's focus is on the American effort to manage its relationship with France, and beyond France with NATO, despite the strains put on those ties due to the war in Algeria. As such, this is a diplomatic history, and it is a very good one. It is much less involved and less biographical than David Halberstam's "Best and the Brightest" about Vietnam, but both authors excel at explaining how policy is developed and implemented. Wall's book has the advantage of covering topic very few English speakers know much about.
Professor Wall's meticulous research through secret reports from 45 - 55 years ago shows how American leaders and diplomats tried to synthesize an approach that loyal to American principles calling for self-determination in the Third World without undermining a French ally determined to keep its prized colony. He explains how the Americans carefully weighed their political support to the French in venues such as the United Nations to help prevent the French Fourth Republic from collapsing under international condemnation. His description of the confrontations between France and newly independent Morocco and Tunisia, and how the U.S. intervened to prevent the Algerian conflict from spreading or pushing the moderates in Tunisia to bail and turn to the USSR and Egypt's Nasser are revealing. Later Wall assesses carefully the changes when DeGaulle came to power in 1958, putting forward a relationship in DeGaulle's mind between the sustained French effort to hold onto Algeria and French support for the American-led NATO alliance.
This is not a detailed assessment of broader French or American foreign policy; its focus is very much the friction between the U.S. and France over the conflict in Algeria. However, for those interested in seeing how day-to-day diplomatic work is undertaken, the readouts of once highly secret meetings between ambassadors, presidents and foreign ministers is rich indeed.
I found the writing and presentation easy to understand. My only problem with the text itself was the many names of officials in the U.S., France, Britain, the USSR and in North Africa. A glossary of names and positions attached to the text would have made tracking who was driving an issue against whom a bit easier to follow.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
0 of 5 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Was de Gaulle as arrogant as he appeared?, June 20, 2002
By A Customer
This review is from: France, the United States, and the Algerian War (Hardcover)
The material is well researched & the story is told with tightly reasoned clarity & in lucid prose. The specialized subject is covered in great depth, and Dr. Wall's backward look at the events of the late 50's & 60's is of great help in sorting them out. Their interest is further enhanced by contemporary tie-ins such as the Arab world & the Middle East today, & by their association with the American tragedy that was Viet Nam. I particularly enjoyed the analysis of motivation & intent of the western politicians & de Gaulle. The irony of all that careful planning & diplomacy, which came to nothing, yet, everything seemed to work out for the best anyway. So de Gaulle appears a seer & it's better to be lucky than smart.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
|
|
Most Recent Customer Reviews
|
