| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Product Details
Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
|
|
Share your thoughts with other customers:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
19 of 19 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars
A Missed Opportunity,
By
This review is from: Fritz Lang: The Nature of the Beast (Hardcover)
...a serious missed opportunity. McGilligan wrote this bio as a man sitting in judgment, holding Lang to a standard so high that the most PC contemporary couldn't possibly meet it.Whatever Lang does is wrong, no matter what the circumstances. Take his flight from the Nazis. McGilligan discovers serious contradictions in Lang's account of his strange and frightening confrontation with Goebbels. McGilligan's conclusion? That Lang was a Nazi sympathizer himself, the evidence being a delay of two months in leaving Germany. This is nonsense. The book itself demonstrates that Lang made more anti-Nazi films (one in the midst of the isolationist period) than any other director. Thea von Harbou, on the other hand, a full-bore party member who stuck it out until the bitter end, is handled with kid gloves. A slight contradiction there, as there is in the account of the blacklist era, where Lang, already burned by one gang of political extremists, is condemned for not adequately defending another, clearly portrayed as dishonest and untrustworthy. The man just can't win. McGilligan also gets some very well-known Hollywood stories wrong (see the Harry Cohn story on p. 398). Lang may have been a flawed genius, but he was a genius, and deserves to be treated as such (see "Print the Legend" by Scott Eymas to see how it's done). His definitive biography remains to be written. This ain't it. (The book also suffers from the standard execrable St. Martins copyediting job: "If it ain't in spellcheck, it don't matter!")
16 of 16 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
Well-researched but pointlessly accusatory,
By A Customer
This review is from: Fritz Lang: The Nature of the Beast (Hardcover)
McGilligan is a demon researcher, digging up facts, comparing contradictory stories, and writing in a very clear and readable prose. But this book amounts to a steady, unrelenting attack on the character of Fritz Lang, and is even needlessly dismissive of many of his movies.McGilligan suggests Lang murdered his first wife and that he was a Nazi sympathizer; the former is highly unlikely, the latter is demonstrably false. If anyone has a kind word to say about Lang, their comments are relegated to the last few lines of a paragaph that's otherwise devoted to attacking the director. Lang evidently really was a tyrant on the set, but he also made many friends over the course of his career. It's interesting to note that McGilligan didn't bother to interview Michel Piccoli, the French actor whom Lang regarded almost as an unadopted son. McGilligan seems to have had an agenda, which was to depict Lang as a completely unsympathetic "beast" (as in the title). NO biographer, especially one as ambitious as McGilligan, should ever present their material with a strong bias, positive or negative. McGilligan's work is more important and meaningful than that of, say, Charles Higham, but this kind of bias dramatically reduces the value of his work.
4 of 4 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
Compelling but deeply flawed,
By Matt the Knife (Los Angeles, City of the Dead) - See all my reviews
This review is from: Fritz Lang: The Nature of the Beast (Paperback)
A reader needs to approach this book with a keen understanding that most biographies (especially Hollywood biographies) are not based on facts; they are based on opinions, assumptions, innuendo, and flat-out lies. If you are seeking a straightforward, informative, fact-based account of the life of Fritz Lang, don't read this book. If, however, you're looking for a compelling portrait of a time, a world, a personality, and the art (and business) of filmmaking, look no further. This is a fascinating portrait, even if it reveals more about the author's biases than about his subject's life. It's still a great read.
The most frustrating aspect of "The Nature of the Beast" is this: it represents the single worst job of copyediting that I've ever seen. The errors are abundant and distracting. The publisher should be embarrassed, and the copy editor should be forced to retake elementary school.
Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
|
|
Suggested Tags from Similar Products(What's this?)Be the first one to add a relevant tag (keyword that's strongly related to this product).
|
|
This product's forum
Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
|
Related forums
|