Most Helpful Customer Reviews
|
|
16 of 16 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars
A Missed Opportunity, June 22, 2000
...a serious missed opportunity. McGilligan wrote this bio as a man sitting in judgment, holding Lang to a standard so high that the most PC contemporary couldn't possibly meet it. Whatever Lang does is wrong, no matter what the circumstances. Take his flight from the Nazis. McGilligan discovers serious contradictions in Lang's account of his strange and frightening confrontation with Goebbels. McGilligan's conclusion? That Lang was a Nazi sympathizer himself, the evidence being a delay of two months in leaving Germany. This is nonsense. The book itself demonstrates that Lang made more anti-Nazi films (one in the midst of the isolationist period) than any other director. Thea von Harbou, on the other hand, a full-bore party member who stuck it out until the bitter end, is handled with kid gloves. A slight contradiction there, as there is in the account of the blacklist era, where Lang, already burned by one gang of political extremists, is condemned for not adequately defending another, clearly portrayed as dishonest and untrustworthy. The man just can't win. McGilligan also gets some very well-known Hollywood stories wrong (see the Harry Cohn story on p. 398). Lang may have been a flawed genius, but he was a genius, and deserves to be treated as such (see "Print the Legend" by Scott Eymas to see how it's done). His definitive biography remains to be written. This ain't it. (The book also suffers from the standard execrable St. Martins copyediting job: "If it ain't in spellcheck, it don't matter!")
|
|
|
12 of 12 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
Well-researched but pointlessly accusatory, August 8, 2001
By A Customer
McGilligan is a demon researcher, digging up facts, comparing contradictory stories, and writing in a very clear and readable prose. But this book amounts to a steady, unrelenting attack on the character of Fritz Lang, and is even needlessly dismissive of many of his movies. McGilligan suggests Lang murdered his first wife and that he was a Nazi sympathizer; the former is highly unlikely, the latter is demonstrably false. If anyone has a kind word to say about Lang, their comments are relegated to the last few lines of a paragaph that's otherwise devoted to attacking the director. Lang evidently really was a tyrant on the set, but he also made many friends over the course of his career. It's interesting to note that McGilligan didn't bother to interview Michel Piccoli, the French actor whom Lang regarded almost as an unadopted son. McGilligan seems to have had an agenda, which was to depict Lang as a completely unsympathetic "beast" (as in the title). NO biographer, especially one as ambitious as McGilligan, should ever present their material with a strong bias, positive or negative. McGilligan's work is more important and meaningful than that of, say, Charles Higham, but this kind of bias dramatically reduces the value of his work.
|
|
|
1 of 3 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
The Beast? Surely no beauty, but . . ., October 10, 2008
This biography of Lang, director of German film classics Metropolis and M, and director of quite a number of not-so-classic American films, attempts to answer the question of whether Lang was like the characters in the movies he directed.
The answer appears to be that he was a nasty, short-tempered director who never got along with many producers, writers, and actors, but he wasn't so beastly as might be deduced from his movies.
The author makes that point that critics in America highly prize his German movies, while foreign critics highly prize his American ones, perhaps raising the bar on the low critical claim for his American output.
In spirit of full disclosure, I must confess to never having seen a Fritz Lang movie, although the clips I've seen of Peter Lorre in M are so chillingly disturbing, I'm not sure I'd want to see the whole thing.
|
|
|
Most Recent Customer Reviews
|