Fuck and over one million other books are available for Amazon Kindle. Learn more
Buy New
$15.14
Qty:1
  • List Price: $17.99
  • Save: $2.85 (16%)
FREE Shipping on orders over $35.
Only 11 left in stock (more on the way).
Ships from and sold by Amazon.com.
Gift-wrap available.
Add to Cart
Have one to sell? Sell on Amazon
Flip to back Flip to front
Listen Playing... Paused   You're listening to a sample of the Audible audio edition.
Learn more
See this image

Fuck: Word Taboo and Protecting our First Amendment Liberties Paperback – September 1, 2009

ISBN-13: 978-1572487116 ISBN-10: 1572487119

Buy New
Price: $15.14
9 New from $1.08 16 Used from $0.01
Amazon Price New from Used from
Kindle
"Please retry"
Paperback
"Please retry"
$15.14
$1.08 $0.01
Free%20Two-Day%20Shipping%20for%20College%20Students%20with%20Amazon%20Student


Frequently Bought Together

Fuck: Word Taboo and Protecting our First Amendment Liberties + Holy Sh*t: A Brief History of Swearing + The F-Word
Price for all three: $44.42

Buy the selected items together

NO_CONTENT_IN_FEATURE

Save up to 90% on Textbooks
Rent textbooks, buy textbooks, or get up to 80% back when you sell us your books. Shop Now

Product Details

  • Paperback: 272 pages
  • Publisher: Sphinx Publishing (September 1, 2009)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 1572487119
  • ISBN-13: 978-1572487116
  • Product Dimensions: 4.9 x 7.1 inches
  • Shipping Weight: 6.4 ounces (View shipping rates and policies)
  • Average Customer Review: 4.2 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (4 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #1,024,942 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

Editorial Reviews

From Publishers Weekly

In a spirited expansion on his law review article, "Fuck," Ohio State Univ. law professor Fairman explores the origin and the affect of perhaps the most notorious word in the English language. Fairman begins with a catalog and limited history of the word, including usages sexual and non-sexual. In tracking down the word's origins-largely unknown-and the abundance of court cases involving it, Fairman highlights the long struggle of conservative forces to expel that word, and other forms of speech, from American society, in direct opposition to the first amendment. Fairman also addresses the downfalls inherent to the amendment, including the exception for speech used to incite violence, and the myriad of punishments used, at state and national levels, to deal with those exceptions. Drawing from a vast selection of historical documentation, Fairman also explores the nature of taboo and related trivia, such as the word's usage across gender lines. Austere and informative, Fairman's social history is uncompromising in its vigilant defense of first amendment rights, both in spite of his subject's potential for offense, and because of it.
Copyright © Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

About the Author

Christopher M. Fairman is a Professor of Law at Moritz College of Law at the Ohio State University in Columbus, Ohio. He is a leading national expert in civil procedure, legal ethics, and the word "fuck." He is a gifted teacher with awards and recognition at the high school, college, and university level.

More About the Author

Discover books, learn about writers, read author blogs, and more.

Customer Reviews

4.2 out of 5 stars
5 star
3
4 star
0
3 star
0
2 star
1
1 star
0
See all 4 customer reviews
Share your thoughts with other customers

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

11 of 13 people found the following review helpful By Steve Reina VINE VOICE on September 21, 2009
Format: Paperback
FIRST A NOTE ON STYLE: Contrary to the statements of author Christopher Fairman, it is not the position of this writer that any reviewer treating his book or the law review article from which it stems is required to actually use the title of his work instead of some euphemism such as the f word or [...] in writing about this material. In a free society truly vibrant discourse is promoted when the participants are permitted to express their reactions as they see fit free of either any mandatory editorial exclusions or in this case inclusions.

THAT BEING SAID...Fairman has produced one of the greatest pieces of legal analysis it has ever been my pleasure to read.

As a practicing lawyer for over twenty years it has rarely been my privilege to see such a masterful melding of psyhology, history and of course legal authority in laying out the law's position on a topic such as here where Professor Fairman discusses the permissible uses of the f word.

As pointed out by Fairman the f word enjoys a particularly taboo status in American language owing to its allusion to an activity so antithetical to the Puritan ethic of chastity which seems to play such a pivotal role in ostensible American morality. Significantly a tracking of especially prohibited curse words from other cultures shows that the f word does not assume the same forbidden status owing to the fact that the word isn't so threatening to their own cultural pretensions.

Indeed the word is so forbidden here studies have shown that it excites primal emotional responses similar only to discovering a snake or suddenly observing someone vomit. It is perhaps for these reasons many react viscerally rather than with the intellectual distance one might typically associate with the use of the spoken word.
Read more ›
2 Comments Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful By William R. Toddmancillas on February 11, 2013
Format: Paperback Verified Purchase
An important book on free speech. Odd that I was not able to include
in review the word prominently appearing in the title. Rather makes
the case that this word is controversial, misunderstood, and should
not be restricted as per First Amendment Rights.

Book arrived quickly in excellent condition
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Format: Kindle Edition Verified Purchase
I use this book for a class I teach about "dirty words," (actually it's about freedom of speech) and I can't say enough about Fairman's determination in publishing it and his diligence in researching it. A fine, fun read.
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
0 of 14 people found the following review helpful By K. Stone on September 2, 2011
Format: Paperback Verified Purchase
Aside from the "amusing" anecdotes and countless references to similarly fatigable 'methods of refrain' this work seems entirely wanton for a lawyer's perspective and so I must wonder into what version of nepotism and disapprobation might this author be invested?!
But of course I was expecting a course reference with emphasis on deconstructing the "Sex as Syn" indoctrination from the archaic to the modern religiose. Or at least a statistical analysis of Municipal Court Discriminations RE Adultery; Both Legal and Illicit! Instead what is offered is a loosely constructed deduction of a word's potential and incidence, not its fact and fiction.
Could it be that Fairman's incapability even at pinpointing the words origin(s) [Whatever its origins...p.40] mean this work was likely an unwanted assignment, resulting in a token of nominalism.

[Furthermore;] Due its publication source & date, I can't help but label it and it's twin CI ("The F-Word"-Sheidlower) as unmitigated reification [opposed to relativism and logical positivism]!

**I finished reviewing Sheidlower's work a few months ago and it was equally dissatisfying: A lot of witheld (or perhaps simply missing) relevant reference information. For instance both "Another Country" James Baldwin (1962) and "The Man Who Had Power Over Women" Gordon M. Williams (1967) make "less sophistical" use of the word (though both are so ecclectic to the point of representing a self-denigrating calumny that it is hard to imagine them NOT included with all the rest of ...a history of chauvinism) but the first uses such an intelligent(fiery) device it's hard to imagine not being drawn in at least throughout the first 87p chapter. And the second is quite the watery droll in comparison, but full of literary subterfuge. Though I doubt I'd ever read either of them completely!!**(5/23/12)
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again

Customer Images

Search

What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?