Customer Reviews

Fujifilm QuickSnap Flash 800 35mm Single Use Camera with Flash

5 star:		(7)
4 star:		(1)
3 star:		(1)
2 star:		(0)
1 star:		(0)

 

 

I'm a big fan of these cameras. I normally shoot with some pretty high-end equipment, but I find it refreshing to have the whole process simplified with these one time use cameras. I prefer the Fuji camera to the Kodak version because I find that Fuji film yields more natural looking colors.

I work in the photo processing world, I am a manager of a high volume photo lab and I must say that Fuji film has taken very large steps to over take Kodak in the film world. From their minilabs, to their digital kiosks, to their one time use 35mm cameras, Fuji film is the way to go. From truer colors, more real film grains, to the obvious less blur, this camera is a wise decision for a one time use camera.

Firstly let me just say, that I'm slightly confused as to all the different 35mm Fuji 'quicksnap' cameras out there. The 2 that I used were like the one shown here, but a slightly different color. Anyway, on to the review:
The Flash indicator took a while to light up, but we got it going after some persistance. The photos were ok, nothing great though. The results produced fairly natural looking colors, but many of the indoor/nightime shots were slightly blurry and grainy. Many photos appeared under-exposed, like the Flash wasn't bright enough. 3/5 stars.

Recently I bought 2 One Time Use Cameras. The Kodak Max HQ Camera and a Fuji Quicksnap Flash Camera. After finishing both Camera's I had the Kodak Camera/Film Developed at a Kodak Express, then the Fuji Camera/Film developed at a Fuji Lab. The Results were very different to each other. The Fuji Quicksnap Flash is clearly the Superior Film/Camera. While the Kodak Prints came back slightly blurry with not much color, the Fuji Prints were Crystal Clear with exceptional Clarity and Bright Colors. The Fuji Camera was also cheaper than the Kodak HQ!

After trying several of the other brands of Single Use Cameras on the Market I thought blurry, washed out dull pics were the norm. However, after buying one of the Fuji Camera's on the spur of the moment I was very suprised by the excellent photos it produced. The Twin packs are a great idea as well!!

For the past 2 Years I've been using the Kodak Range of Disposable Cameras and have been fairly happy with the end results. I thought I'd try for a Change the Fuji Disposable Camera with the Flash. The Model I purchased wasn't Identical to the one featured here, it was a Slight Variation. I live in Australia so I guess the Models vary from Country to Country.
Anyway, I was VERY Happy with the Results when I picked the Developed Photos Up. They were all Crystal Clear, And best of all the Skin Tones of the Subjects were Perfect and Natural looking. This is something the Kodak range of One time Use Cameras don't always Capture. I strongly recommend this Camera, the results are almost as good (if not Better!) than a Real Camera.
I'll definately be sticking to the Fuji Camera's from now on instead of the Kodak MAX and Kodak MAX HQ Disposables.

I took this camera w/ me to Texas. It was very easy to use. I also took my poloroid with me, but I liked the dissposible cameras' quality far better. This a great camera to use almost everywhere, GET THIS CAMERA!!

Fairly Easy to use, Photo's turned out Clear, Colorful both indoors and out. Apart from having a little trouble getting the Flash to Work it was fine.

I try to remember to keep a spare in the closet. One time use cameras are so convenient. You don't have to worry about damaging it (at least you don't lose an expensive camera) and you can put it in your pocket. I've actually had better pictures with a "one time" than with my $500 Nikon. Image that! Kodak or Fuji ... should be about the same. Fuji is usually a little cheaper. Both seem to be just as good. Great to put on tables at wedding receptions!