21 of 23 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Comprehensive Contributors' List - Perfect for Classroom Use, April 21, 2003
By A Customer
This review is from: The Galatians Debate: Contemporary Issues in Rhetorical and Historical Interpretation (Hardcover)
This volume offers a comprehensive introduction to the contemporary debates on Paul's Epistle to the Galatians. Perfect for classroom use. In addition to complete indexes and a volume bibliography, there is a glossary of technical terms that arise in the volume.
The essays are separated into three major topical areas to cover discussion of: 1) Rhetorical and Epistolary Genre; 2) The Autobiographical Narratives; 3) The Galatian Situation(s).
Contents include:
Introduction, Mark D. Nanos
Part 1. Rhetorical and Epistolary Genre:
A. Rhetorical Approaches:
1. The Literary Composition and Function of Paul's Letter to the Galatians, Hans Dieter Betz
2. The Rhetorical Outline for Galatians: A Reconsideration, Robert G. Hall
3. The Letter of Paul to the Galatians: A Deliberative Speech, Joop Smit
4. Galatians (1:1-5): Paul and Greco-Roman Rhetoric, Robert M. Berchman
5. Apostasy to Paganism: The Rhetorical Stasis of the Galatian Controversy, Troy Martin
6. Paul's Epistles and Ancient Greek and Roman Rhetoric, Carl Joachim Classen
B. Epistolary Approaches
7. Paul's Letter to the Galatians: Epistolary Genre, Content, and Structure, Nils A. Dahl
8. A Paradigm of the Apocalypse: The Gospel in the Light of Epistolary Analysis, G. Walter Hansen
Part 2: Autobiographical Narratives:
A. Rhetorical Approaches
9. Rhetorical Identification in Paul's Autobiographical Narrative: Galatians 1.13-2.14, Paul E. Koptak
10. Paul's Argumentation in Galatians 1-2, Johan S. Vos
11. Epideictic Rhetoric and Persona in Galatians One and Two, James D. Hester
B. Socio-historical Approaches
12. The Incident at Antioch (Gal. 2.11-18), James D. G. Dunn
13. Judaism, the Circumcision of Gentiles, and Apocalyptic Hope: Another Look at Galatians 1 and 2, Paula Fredriksen
14. Making and Breaking an Agreement Mediterranean Style: A New Reading of Galatians 2:1-14, Philip F. Esler
15. What Was at Stake in Peter's `Eating with Gentiles' at Antioch? Mark D. Nanos
Part 3: The Galatian Situation(s)
16. The Opposition to Paul, A. E. Harvey
17. The Agitators and the Galatian Congregation, Robert Jewett
18. A Law-Observant Mission to Gentiles, J. Louis Martyn
19. Paul and the Opponents of the Christ-Gospel in Galatia, Nikolaus Walter
20. Mirror-Reading a Polemical Letter: Galatians as a Test Case, John M. G. Barclay
21. The Argumentative Situation of Galatians, B. C. Lategan
22. The Inter- and Intra-Jewish Political Context of Paul's Letter to the Galatians, Mark D. Nanos
23. Foolish Galatians?-A Recipient-Oriented Assessment of Paul's Letter, Dieter Mitternacht
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
2 of 2 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Paul's Rhetoric, June 19, 2009
This review is from: The Galatians Debate: Contemporary Issues in Rhetorical and Historical Interpretation (Hardcover)
Ever since Hans Dieter Betz proposed, in his 1979 Hermeneia commentary on Galatians, that Paul was employing elements of Greco-Roman rhetoric, this idea has dominated modern criticism of the Pauline corpus, especially the books of Romans, 1 & 2 Corinthians and Galatians.
It is unfortunate that few of the rhetorical critics of Paul can agree as to exactly which rhetorical elements mentioned in the surviving ancient Greek or Latin handbooks correspond to the chapters of Paul's letters. This inability to make rhetorical sense of Paul was examined in Philip Kern's 1998 book _Rhetoric in Galatians_. Part of the problem is that the "rules" of rhetoric, both ancient and modern, are not written in stone.
Mark Nanos, the editor of _The Galatians Debate_, has himself written on the subject of Paul's use of language in _Mystery of Romans_ (1996) and _Irony of Galatians_ (2002). I thought he did an excellent job of bringing together, and juxtaposing, several critics with very different views on the subject.
Well worth the read.
Dave H
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No