The Game of Life: College Sports and Educational Values and over one million other books are available for Amazon Kindle. Learn more

Kindle Edition
 
   
Have one to sell? Sell yours here
The Game of Life
 
 
Start reading The Game of Life: College Sports and Educational Values on your Kindle in under a minute.

Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.

The Game of Life [Hardcover]

William G. Bowen (Author), James L. Shulman (Author)
3.2 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (8 customer reviews)


Available from these sellers.


Formats

Amazon Price New from Used from
Kindle Edition $22.18  
Hardcover --  
Paperback $24.65  

Book Description

January 15, 2001

The President of Williams College faces a firestorm for not allowing the women's lacrosse team to postpone exams to attend the playoffs. The University of Michigan loses $2.8 million on athletics despite averaging 110,000 fans at each home football game. Schools across the country struggle with the tradeoffs involved with recruiting athletes and updating facilities for dozens of varsity sports. Does increasing intensification of college sports support or detract from higher education's core mission?

James Shulman and William Bowen introduce facts into a terrain overrun by emotions and enduring myths. Using the same database that informed The Shape of the River, the authors analyze data on 90,000 students who attended thirty selective colleges and universities in the 1950s, 1970s, and 1990s. Drawing also on historical research and new information on giving and spending, the authors demonstrate how athletics influence the class composition and campus ethos of selective schools, as well as the messages that these institutions send to prospective students, their parents, and society at large.

Shulman and Bowen show that athletic programs raise even more difficult questions of educational policy for small private colleges and highly selective universities than they do for big-time scholarship-granting schools. They discover that today's athletes, more so than their predecessors, enter college less academically well-prepared and with different goals and values than their classmates--differences that lead to different lives. They reveal that gender equity efforts have wrought large, sometimes unanticipated changes. And they show that the alumni appetite for winning teams is not--as schools often assume--insatiable. If a culprit emerges, it is the unquestioned spread of a changed athletic culture through the emulation of highly publicized teams by low-profile sports, of men's programs by women's, and of athletic powerhouses by small colleges.

Shulman and Bowen celebrate the benefits of collegiate sports, while identifying the subtle ways in which athletic intensification can pull even prestigious institutions from their missions. By examining how athletes and other graduates view The Game of Life--and how colleges shape society's view of what its rules should be--Bowen and Shulman go far beyond sports. They tell us about higher education today: the ways in which colleges set policies, reinforce or neglect their core mission, and send signals about what matters.



Editorial Reviews

From Publishers Weekly

Shulman and Bowen (respectively, coauthor of and collaborator on The Shape of the River: Long-Term Consequences of Considering Race in College and University Admissions) examine the relationship between college athletics and later achievement among male and female student athletes at 30 colleges and universities in this well-researched, impressively broad and thorough study. The schools are all academically selective, but compete athletically at widely varying levels, ranging from division 1A powerhouses to small conferences of liberal arts and women's colleges. Using the same database they created for their previous book, Shulman and Bowen look at college athletes who enrolled in 1951 ("thought of by some as `the good old days' "), 1976 (after enrollment compositions changed because of the civil rights movement and increases in coeducation) and 1989 (the most recent year for which they could collect data tracing the students' college years through their early careers), identifying trends, noting changes and examining differences in the college and post-college experiences of male and female athletes. The authors identify a set of character traits common to most athletes no matter what sport they play, and present a great deal of data countering conventional myths about college sports. Additionally, Shulman and Bowen offer suggestions about how college athletics could be better run. The book presents a lot of interesting data that contradicts the conventional myths about college sports. (Athletes graduate at a higher rate than students at large; even at the big-time programs, college sports are likely to lose money for their schools.) Anyone connected to college athletics--from coaches and admissions officials to trustees--will find much of interest here. (Feb.)Forecast: Despite its textbook-like style and overwhelming detail, this volume is bound to reach large audiences, as it's been the subject of articles in the New Yorker and the New York Times, and featured on NPR.

Copyright 2001 Cahners Business Information, Inc.

From Library Journal

Shulman is the financial and administrative officer of the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and director of the foundation's College and Beyond research program. Bowen is president of the foundation and formerly president of Princeton University. Here they argue persuasively that intercollegiate athletic programs have become thoroughly institutionalized and that to combat this trend the links between athletics and the educational missions of American universities must be strengthened. Pointing to a dramatic shift in the way college sports are affecting the admission, education, and future lives of all students, the authors note that recruited athletes have a much greater admissions advantage than minority students and alumni children. The result is the formation of a separate athlete subculture in which the athletes socialize and share the same career goals while simultaneously developing the propensity for academic underperformance. Shulman and Bowen urge colleges and universities to find a way to integrate the positive aspects of athletics into their educational missions and to strengthen their role in shaping "the game of life" on college campuses. Recommended for academic libraries. Samuel T. Huang, Univ. of Arizona Lib., Tucson
Copyright 2001 Reed Business Information, Inc.

Product Details

  • Hardcover: 378 pages
  • Publisher: Princeton University Press (January 15, 2001)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 069107075X
  • ISBN-13: 978-0691070759
  • Product Dimensions: 9.5 x 6.5 x 1.5 inches
  • Shipping Weight: 1.8 pounds
  • Average Customer Review: 3.2 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (8 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #587,862 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

More About the Authors

Discover books, learn about writers, read author blogs, and more.

 

Customer Reviews

8 Reviews
5 star:
 (2)
4 star:
 (1)
3 star:
 (3)
2 star:
 (1)
1 star:
 (1)
 
 
 
 
 
Average Customer Review
3.2 out of 5 stars (8 customer reviews)
 
 
 
 
Share your thoughts with other customers:
Most Helpful Customer Reviews

40 of 44 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars This book calls for immediate action, February 22, 2001
This review is from: The Game of Life (Hardcover)
Last week I delivered a letter to the president of the University at Buffalo faculty senate that began: "I write to recommend that the University at Buffalo withdraw from Division IA athletics. I base much of my argument for downgrading at least to the university's former Division III status on the recently published book THE GAME OF LIFE by James L. Shulman and William G. Bowen (Princeton University Press)...."

It is not often that a book can have as major an impact on a reader as this one has had on me -- and, I add, should have on everyone interested in education. It makes a compelling case that Division IA athletics is bad not only for a university's academic community but for the community at large as well. And it has led me to take this drastic action. I only hope that the university students, faculty and administration will have the wisdom to act favorably in response to this recommendation.

THE GAME OF LIFE is a myth destroyer. The authors bring to bear statistics gathered from 90,000 students at 30 colleges that are selective enough to have to turn away many well qualified applicants. "Every spring," the authors say, "valedictorians with straight A averages, and applicants with stellar SAT scores who may have conducted original laboratory research or made a full-length documentary film, are rejected because there are only so many spots in a class. Because there are so many outstanding candidates, a place in the entering class...is a scarce resource."

Basing their conclusions on a massive ten year quantitative research program that includes data collected in 1951, 1976 and 1989, these authors effectively destroy such accepted convictions as college sports programs pay for themselves, playing sports builds character, athletic contests encourage alumni support, and college sports play a major factor in the integration of underrepresented minorities into higher education. The authors brought to their task impeccable qualifications. Both are officers of the Andrew F. Mellon Foundation and Bowen is a former Princeton University president. Earlier they drew on the same resources for a widely respected study of race-sensitive college admissions called THE SHAPE OF THE RIVER.

Here are a few of their conclusions: Scholarship athletes not only arrive at college with poorer credentials (a 237 point SAT deficit in IA schools) but, despite their special tutoring programs and gut courses, they achieve even poorer records once on campus. It is rare for an athletic program to pay for itself even when the teams are winners. They site the University of Michigan where the teams did very well in 1998-1999 but the program lost $3.8 million. Their bottom line: "athletics is a bad business." College expenses for all other extracurricular activities represent a tiny fraction of those for athletics. Minorities are not well served by athletic programs. And, perhaps worst of all, the special entrance attention given to athletes has a strong negative effect on the attitudes of secondary school students.

Required reading for all concerned about the future of education.

Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


16 of 21 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars An important book but written in bureaucrateze, February 25, 2001
By A Customer
This review is from: The Game of Life (Hardcover)
The findings in this book are very important. The authors prove that Ivy League and other prestigious schools admit athletes with significantly lower SAT scores than regular students need for admission. They also prove that an "athletic culture" is taking over these schools just as it did big-time college sports schools (see the recent well-written book, Beer & Circus). Then, in their most valuable finding, they prove that women athletes are not really helped by spending so much time in sports and away from serious studies, and that athletes do not become better leaders than regular grads of schools (the book looks at many grads from the 1950s and 1970s).

All that is good stuff but the authors make it very hard to find that out. They write in a tepid prose, full of passive constructions and qualifications, that makes reading the book very slow going. Often it is like reading against a full-court press. Although Frank DeFord endorses the book, the authors should have read a lot of his work before starting on theirs. BTW, author William Bowen is the head of the Mellon Foundation and author James Shulman is a financial officer with the foundation--no wonder they write bureaucratic prose!

The ideas in the book are very important but many readers will be put off by the prose.

Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


4 of 5 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars Great data but a slow academic read, May 3, 2004
By A Customer
I was enlightened and educated by this book. My starting opinion was directly opposed to college athletics as they are at many major universities. However, through this research, I've come to see the differences between "big-time" sports such as basketball and football, and most other college sports. This agreed with my college recollections where I knew many athletes in "smaller" sports who worked hard as schoolwork and their sport. They played their sport for the love of the game and the camaraderie, but most knew that their careers ended at graduation. I continue to admire them and wonder why some many universities continue to hurt those sports to maintain the larger sports.

College football and basketball, in particular, are fully-subsidized minor leagues for the NFL and NBA. If the NCAA drastically changes the way it does business, those leagues will have to find another way to test and screen athletes. This won't hurt the schools at all; in fact, the schools will benefit. Good student/athletes will still get a college education (as many baseball players do today), and pure athletes will still have a chance to compete and become professionals.

This book substantially helped shape my opinions on college sports in a well-researched and documented manner.

I recommend this book for anyone who wants a balanced yet critical look into college athletics. jgalt5@yahoo.com

Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No

Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
 
 
 
Most Recent Customer Reviews






Only search this product's reviews



Inside This Book (learn more)
First Sentence:
SOME PEOPLE love college sports and others hate them. Read the first page
Key Phrases - Statistically Improbable Phrases (SIPs): (learn more)
coed liberal arts colleges, basketball expenditures, general infrastructure costs, football expenditures, athlete status, advanced degree attainment, admissions advantage, team expenditures, intercollegiate athletes, significant earnings advantage, playing intercollegiate sports, core educational mission, sector composite, academically selective schools, other women students, athletic recruitment, academic underperformance, athlete culture, postseason revenues, women athletes, playing college sports, recruited athletes, alumni leaders, campus ethos, coaching costs
Key Phrases - Capitalized Phrases (CAPs): (learn more)
High Profile, Ivy League, Lower Profile, Athlete Status, Male Only, African American, University of Michigan, Notre Dame, Athletes Students, Appendix Table, Athletics Disclosure Act, Academic Index, Full-Time Male Workers, Little League, Penn State, Big Ten, Mean Own Earned, New York Times, Public Universities Division, Williams College, Graduates Earning Advanced Degrees, Michigan State, Perceived Current Emphasis, Ronald Smith, Supreme Court
New!
Books on Related Topics | Concordance | Text Stats
Browse Sample Pages:
Front Cover | Table of Contents | First Pages | Index | Back Cover | Surprise Me!
Search Inside This Book:





Suggested Tags from Similar Products

 (What's this?)
Be the first one to add a relevant tag (keyword that's strongly related to this product).
 
(37)
(22)

Your tags: Add your first tag
 

Customer Discussions

This product's forum
Discussion Replies Latest Post
No discussions yet

Ask questions, Share opinions, Gain insight
Start a new discussion
Topic:
First post:
Prompts for sign-in
 


Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
Search all Amazon discussions
   
Related forums





Look for Similar Items by Category


Look for Similar Items by Subject