Most Helpful Customer Reviews
38 of 39 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
Hirshson's Appetizer to D'Este's Main Course, August 23, 2002
By A Customer
Books written on the life of the great American general, George S. Patton, prove the maxim that history is not objective, but interpretive. Certainly Hirshson's work is a new interpretation of mostly familiar facts, but does the reader accept Hirshson's version? After reading this book, I came to the conclusion that, while it is an admirable attempt by Hirshson, I still must consider D'Este's work THE Patton masterpiece. Hirshson does use new sources previously unused in other Patton biographies and his examination of the events occurring after Patton's death concerning his diary are intriguing. However, he lightly skims over, in my opinion, very significant moments in Patton's career and private life. Most disturbing to me is the emphasis on blaming Patton's "Blood and Guts" pre-battle speeches as the cause of atrocities committed by American troops in Sicily. I find that to be a real stretch on the author's part. However, the book is a good beginning for anyone discovering Patton, but I think it will leave them wanting more which, in that case, they should then feast on D'Este's deeply engossing magnum opus. I found the main difference in the two authors to be this: D'Este admires his subject; Hirshson does not.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
50 of 53 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
Review (General Patton: A Soldier's Life), September 9, 2002
Stanley P. Hirshson's "General Patton: A Soldier's Life" is an average book. Leveraging the preface, Mr. Hirshson seems to offer an apology and justification to prepare the reader for the journey he is about to embark. Mr. Hirshson writes, "I take issue with the way previous biographies of Patton have been researched. Incomplete research has, in my opinion, led to interpretations that are at best dubious." Published within a few years of Carlo D'Este's single volume biography of General Patton, Mr. Hirshson seems to rely not on his ability to present a compelling biography, but rather on his determination to find fault or deficiencies in the efforts of previous authors. Mr. Hirshson does present new and previously unmentioned events and anecdotes regarding the General. However, he goes out of his way to put a different spin on a number of well-known and universally accepted facts surrounding the Man. With 60 years of research and scrutiny relative to General Patton, it is difficult to believe that Mr. Hirshson is accurate in each of his claims. These claims come across as a desperate attempt by the author to separate his book from previous works. Several of the claims are, when viewed in context of the whole, unimportant. The single exception to this is the author's account of the atrocities committed in Sicily. Mr. Hirshson makes the absurd argument that these atrocities were the result of Patton's fire breathing and warlike speeches to his men. Mr. Hirshson ends the chapter by doing something that is unusual for a book of this type. After spending several pages walking the reader through his interpretation of the atrocities, Mr. Hirshson concludes by offering a half-hearted justification for even including this information. Mr. Hirshson writes, "Of what earthly value is uncovering and writing about such events sixty years after they occurred? The twentieth century might well be labeled the century of bold talk leading to holocausts and ethnic cleansing. The more such tragedies are discussed, perhaps the rarer they will become." Love him or hate him, General Patton is a larger than life figure. Thus, even under the pen of Mr. Hirshson, the General still manages to leap off the page. For the individual who has studied General Patton, Mr. Hirshson's effort at chronicling his life will undoubtedly add to the fascination of the man. For the first time reader of General Patton, the book is bound to leave more questions than answers. The book does not sufficiently provide the background or circumstances necessary to place Patton's decisions, methods, successes, and failures in context. The book spends little time in describing Patton's formative years, his close relationship with his father, his West Point years, and other significant events such as his courtship of his future wife, his service during World War I, or his work in creating the first American tank corps. In bouncing over these important junctures of the General's life, the author misses the opportunity to capture the reader. More importantly, the lack of this detail makes it difficult to follow the General through his own development as a soldier and a Leader. Ultimately, "Patton: A General's Life" falls short in defining the complex, prejudiced, and brilliant General Patton. While socially acceptable behavior may change from generation to generation, the dimensions of the human spirit remain constant. It is with this in mind that one should examine the life of General George S. Patton, Jr.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
15 of 16 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars
Not quite as advertised, April 6, 2003
Despite what Hirshson claims in his preface (over 12 yrs of archival research!), this book does not break new ground in Patton historiography. While he does uncover (or actually use) some new materials such as letters and diaries of John Wood, the 4th Armored div commander, most of his primary source is the same used by earlier biographers of Patton from D'Este all the way back to Farago. Unfortunately, his interpretations of the same materials are, to be kind, adventurous and certainly open to criticisms. One ex. is Hirshson uses Liddell Hart's claim that Patton didn't think mobile exploitation was possible in Normandy. From this bit (and as Mearsheimer showed, Liddell Hart was not above self-serving revisionist history), Hirshson claims that Patton was not nearly the armored warfare visionary his previous biographers claimed (a tough proposition to sell no doubt). He conveniently forgets the fact that Patton was talking about the terrain immediately after the beachhead (namely the bocage country) and the two month long struggle validated Patton's prediction. Another disturbing part of the book is Hirshson's claim that Patton's war speeches were responsible for American atrocities. This is just inane. Any serious reader of Patton's own works understands that Patton more than anyone else realized the difficulty of converting democratic citizenry into fighting men against an experienced Wehrmacht. Even more disturbing is Hirshson's focus on Patton's anti-Semitic views. While his views were deplorable and unjustifiable, they're hardly unrepresentative of his social peers (namely top American military generals). Considerable amount of this focus is present in his concluding chapter without really connecting how his views impacted his military conduct. He attempts to connect this to Patton's military governorship of Bavaria, but most Patton biographers and military historians would agree that it was Patton's political naivete and ignorance (after all, his political views were conservative to say the least) situated in a position where he was least suited. His work sheds some new light on John Wood, a Patton friend and his first 4th Armored commander. However, in the overall Patton historiography (despite Wood's accomplishments), Wood's importance is a minor one. Overall, a disappointing work that does not come close to superceding Blumenson's annotated Patton Papers or D'Este's monumental biography. However, I do believe there are plenty of Montgomery admirers in UK who would love to scoop up this book.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
|
|
Most Recent Customer Reviews
|