George Antheil: Symphonies 4 & 5

George Antheil (Composer), Hugh Wolff (Conductor), Frankfurt Radio Symphony Orchestra (Orchestra) | Format: Audio CD

Product Details

• Orchestra: Frankfurt Radio Symphony Orchestra
• Conductor: Hugh Wolff
• Composer: George Antheil
• Audio CD (November 14, 2000)
• Number of Discs: 1
• Label: Cpo Records
• ASIN: B000051Y0Z
• Average Customer Review: 5.0 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (2 customer reviews)
• Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #115,802 in Music (See Top 100 in Music)

Track Listings

1. Sym No.4 '1942': Moderato

2. Sym No.4 '1942': Allegro

3. Sym No.4 '1942': Scherzo

4. Sym No.4 '1942': Allegro Non Troppo

5. Decatur At Algiers

6. Sym No.5 'Joyous': Allegro

7. Sym No.5 'Joyous': Adagio Molto

8. Sym No.5 'Joyous': Finale. Allegretto

Customer Reviews

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

11 of 11 people found the following review helpful:

5.0 out of 5 stars the best available recordings of Antheil's symphonies, April 12, 2004

By 

Arthur Maisel (New York, NY United States) - See all my reviews
(REAL NAME)   

This review is from: George Antheil: Symphonies 4 & 5 (Audio CD)

George Antheil had more ups and downs than most in his career as an American composer. From the extravagant (and perhaps ultimately damaging) attention paid him in Europe in his early twenties---though many, including Aaron Copland, considered him at the time to be the most talented American composer of the postwar generation---he fell into semi-neglect after the Ballet Mechanique fiasco at Carnegie Hall in 1927. He found his way to Hollywood in the 1930s and was able to support his compositional habit by writing movie scores for part of the year. The 1940s saw a temporary resurgence in his career with the three symphonies numbers 4, 5, and 6.

Why these symphonies are not in the repertory is something of a mystery. They are not masterpieces of the highest order, it's true---but plenty of less interesting and infectious music gets played year after year. They are not easy to perform, demanding careful balancing of their sometimes complex textures and virtuoso playing by soloists in all sections, though by the standards of twentieth-century music, they are not difficult. So perhaps it is the economics of rehearsal time that explains it, but a well-prepared performance of any of these works would almost certainly be enthusiastically received by an audience.

Of the two available recordings of each of the symphonies, the Hugh Wolff performances are the most satisfactory. Despite some specific reservations that will be mentioned below, it has to be said that Wolff does a wonderful job of capturing the excitement of Antheil's music and making the pieces hang together convincingly. For while Antheil sometimes wrote long stretches of continuous music (in the first movement of the sixth symphony, for example), his most characteristic style was a kind of montage technique, in which the music can easily fall apart into a series of seemingly unrelated phrases if not played with an overall sense of shape.

The question of originality is often raised in connection to Antheil's music, the most frequent complaint being that it sounds like Shostakovitch. It undeniably does, in places (though Antheil always claimed that the influence was his on the Russian, not vice versa). But Antheil has a distinctive voice, despite some of his procedures being traceable to the Stravinsky of Le Sacre and Symphonies of Wind Instruments, despite having an orchestral palette like Shostakovitch and Prokofiev. One can also hear early Ives in his music (the slow movement of the fifth symphony) and traces of Copland (ditto). A case could be made that it is the common influence of Mahler and other late-nineteenth-century symphonists that explains the similarities rather than contemporaries copying one another. (The public was not that aware of Mahler in the '40s, but composers decidedly were.)

Now for some nitpicking: The accelerando in the last movement of fifth symphony is better managed in the Barry Kolman performance. (It sounds as though Wolff tries to get the tempo up at the point indicated in the score, but then a tympani solo in slightly slow eighth notes keeps the tempo from pressing forward; the result is that the final presto seems abrupt and unmotivated.) Wolff's tempos in last movement of the sixth symphony are just this side of being too fast---the ensemble suffers noticeably---although the performance is even more exciting than Theodor Kuchar's cleaner one.

The recollection of the main theme of the first movement near the end of the fifth symphony (in a quite Ivesian phantasmagoria) is clearer in the Kolman than in the Wolff---perhaps because of the apparently closer miking. (All the details of the score, especially the percussion, are clearer in the Kolman, so if you are a fan of the Solti x-ray technique, you might prefer Kolman's performance.)

Finally, one real quibble: Neither performance of the fifth symphony follows the score in making the initial cymbal crash suffacato (short, like a hi-hat). The way Antheil asked for the cymbal to be played is much more of an initial "grabber"---something composers do think about.

It is good that there are now two highly accomplished performances of the fourth and fifth symphonies in addition to the old rather rough and ready performances from the 1950s. Perhaps, on the evidence of these recordings (and those of the sixth symphony), these highly enjoyable pieces will begin to show up on concert programs.

5 of 5 people found the following review helpful:

5.0 out of 5 stars Two Terrific Symphonies, December 5, 2000

By 

D. A Wend (Arlington Heights, IL USA) - See all my reviews
(TOP 1000 REVIEWER)    (REAL NAME)   

Amazon Verified Purchase

This review is from: George Antheil: Symphonies 4 & 5 (Audio CD)

These are tuneful symphonies that should appeal to many listeners of classical music. The 4th symphony is intended to be a picture in music of a circus, but this is overly simplistic. The subtitle "1942" indicates the time of its composition during World War Two and the affect of the war on Anthiel is reflected in this music. So, there is a tense quality to the music not unlike the works Shostakovich was writing at the same time. The similarity to Shostakovich was picked up by critics of the time suggesting that Anthiel was an American Shostakovich and vice versa.

Anthiel was doing quite well during the 1940's and Leopold Stokowski was championing his music. The 5th Symphony "Joyous" is one of celebration, Anthiel's ode to joy. At the time he wrote this work, Anthiel thought it his best music, expressing his joy and sorrows of life, and also striking out in a new direction. In spite of this, it is thoughtful and brilliant rather than a dirge, and the subtitle reflects the mood well. There is a Russian quality to the music that makes one think of Prokofiev and Shostakovich, but there is another dimension to the music that belongs to Anthiel.

The short piece "Decatur at Algiers" is a nocturne for orchestra that wonderfully sets the mood an exotic location. 2000 marked the centenary of George Anthiel and it is about time that we heard his music. Hugh Wolff has done a great service to this music with this disc and his earlier one of Symphonies 1 and 6.