1 of 1 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
A great piece of work with some annoying flaws, November 3, 2003
This review is from: Germans and the Revolution of 1848-1849 (New German-American Studies/Neue Deutsch-Amerikanische Studien) (Hardcover)
I have mixed feelings about this book. It definitely does a great job in explaining the causes of revolutionary unrest in Central Europe, and depicting the course of events as well as the revolution's final failure which caused so many disappointed German patriots to emigrate to the United States, among them most notably Carl Schurz. What annoys me though is the many little factual errors and misspellings:
- p.3: In 1848 there were no "ecclesiastical principalities" in Germany any more. They had been dissolved by the Principal Decree of the Imperial Deputation or "Reichsdeputationshauptschluß" in 1803 already!
- p.3: "Even now, Germans refer to each other as Burgundians or Swabians, so long is their memory of the past". Germans may refer to each other as Swabians or Bavarians but certainly not as Burgundians. Burgundy is a region in France; and you have to go back to as early as the 5th century AD to find the Germanic tribe of the Burgundians settling in the area around Worms and Mainz. But the collective memory does not go back that far. This is simply ridiculous.
- p.5: "In the following year [1806], sixteen principalities as well as Westphalia and the new grand duchy of Warsaw joined in a shaky confederation known as the Rheinbund..." The Napoleonic Kingdom of Westphalia came into being only a year later (1807) and the duchy [!] of Warsaw was never member of the Rheinbund (there was only a personal union with Frederick August, King of Saxony, as duke).
- p. 7: Misspelling: recte Holstein-Gottorp, not "Holstein-Göttorp".
- p. 143: "The Prussian envoy in Karlsruhe was troubled because Stephanie, the widowed Grossherzogin of Hesse-Darmstadt, seemed to be encouraging these undesirable international heroes". Stephanie de Beauharnais, Napoleon's stepdaughter, was Grossherzogin of Baden!
p. 145: "... after the Vienna settlement of 1815 the territories on the right bank of the Rhine had been ceded to Bavaria". It was territories on the left bank of the Rhine!
p. 145: "For some reason, press censorship had not been as strict in the Palatinate as in other parts of Bavaria ..." The reasons were quite obvious: the Palatinate had been incorporated into France for about twenty years, and its inhabitants had kept the French law and French institutions after the territory was ceded to Bavaria.
p. 171: recte Grossherzog of Baden, not "Herzog" and not "archduke" (pp. 226 and 229).
p. 236: recte Ludwig zu Oettingen-Wallerstein, not "Öltingen-Wallenstein".
p.251: Bulgarians were not among the nationalities of the Habsburg Empire.
p. 281: "The document stated ... that Preussen geht fortan in Deutschland [auf]" - the particle "auf" is missing here but it is decisive for the meaning of the phrase.
p. 380: recte zum Hahner Hof, not "zum hahner Hof".
p. 454: Frederic William IV was elected as "Emperor of the Germans" not "King of the Germans".
p. 465: recte Reichsstatthalter, not "Reischsstatthalter".
Is this because the author relied on bad sources, or did she just not care?
Nonetheless, this is a great piece of work based on eyewitness reports and contemporary documents and it does not follow the popular notion that attributes the revolution's eventual failure to German obedience and passivity but tries to unveil the complexities of the issues and understand the leading personalities as people of their time.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No