Most Helpful Customer Reviews
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
A Script That Wanders On The Outskirts Of Logic Leaves Only A Neutral Impression From A Rather Indistinct Storyline., October 7, 2008
This premiere film for the Greek writer/director Vangelis Seitanidis made the festival rounds within the European continent as well as the United States, gaining the Best Film award at the Thessaloniki Fest in 2001, where Seitanidis was also accorded honours as Best New Director, and where third billed in this film Spyros Stavrinidis garnered the Best Supporting Actor prize. From this same event, Seitanidis took home a trophy for Best Screenplay of the Year, given by The Hellenic Association of Playwrights. The picture's American debut occurred at the 2003 Houston Worldfest where it gained many admirers, and it was well received in 2004 at San Francisco's Greek Film Festival. All of which may cause a discerning viewer to wonder if the competition was something less than potent for a piece that provides only passable entertainment value, as it teeters bootlessly 'twixt being a melodrama of romance and a work of crime based suspense. Takis (Emilios Chilakis), a medical student whose ethics are essentially non-existent, is only barely supporting himself as a minimum stakes player at roulette in a hinterland resort casino, where he discovers that a large stakes gambler who shares the same table, Leonidas (Stavrinidis) is utilizing his numbers. When challenged, Leonidas convinces Takis, over the latter's objections, that they should function as a team. Their alliance becomes increasingly significant after Takis is expelled from his university for cheating, while at the same time falling in love with a newly hired young novice dealer, Vera (Maria Solomou), who just happens to be the daughter of Leonidas, her father thereby forbidden from entering the casino due to his offspring being employed there. Not being discouraged by this turn of events, the older man arranges for Takis to play in his stead, using funds of the veteran gambler, while retaining 30% of any winnings. Having been ejected from school for cribbing during an examination, Takis is hoping to sustain himself solely through his partnership with crafty Spyros, but since that compulsive gambler's time and attention are used as an actively radical labour union official while additionally campaigning for public office, it becomes plain to Takis that he will be unable to achieve more than a modest amount at the gaming tables. It also soon becomes clear to him that Vera has more hunger for money than for Takis, as she instigates an amourous relationship with her supervisor, the casino pit boss, performed by Stelios Christoforidis, and in an attempt to offset her carelessly slatternly ways, Takis decides that he may bring her round to favour him through suggesting a method by which the two can steal a large sum of cash from the gambling establishment. Normally, for a crime caper film of this sort, the responsible production team attempts to create a narrative that will provide agonizing moments of suspense to viewers, but in this instance the primary concern for the felonious pair would appear to be how they might share proceeds taken during the heist, and how they may be able to remain together, as they do not have immediate access to the purloined cash. The crime itself is neither shown nor discussed. Additionally, since the film opens with Takis in prison, a viewer will not have the foggiest idea as to any interrelationship between his theft and the means of his apprehension. Unfortunately, this is typical of the wayward writing that eventually undermines the work, and that is as well largely responsible for the failure of the piece to receive distribution removed from the festival circuit. It is shot with 35mm film, in 1.66:1 widescreen process, and is recorded with monaural sound. A good deal of the musical track is supplied by "Calexico" and by Bob Dylan's single of "Romance in Durango." A little more attention to English subtitle accuracy would have been useful to those viewers not fluent in Modern Greek. Although at times vigourously, yet too often variably, fashioned, the screenplay undermines efforts by the stronger players such as Stavrinidis and Christoforidis.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
0 of 1 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
INFO..., February 15, 2007
This review is from: Ghost of a Chance (DVD)
A slick thriller from Greece with a story that rolls fluidly along in the hands of writer/director Vangelis Seitanidis... AWARDS: Winner! Best Debut Film! - Greek Academy Awards!... Winner! Best Director! - Greek Academy Awards!... Winner! Best Supporting Actor! - Greek Academy Awards!
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
1 of 4 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars
Slick, but unsatisfying, August 24, 2004
This review is from: Ghost of a Chance (DVD)
Here's a Greek film that tries hard to emulate American heist thrillers and does not work--in spite of the fact that it was awarded best debut film, best screenplay, and best supporting actor by the Greek Academy Awards. Boasting two leads who are electrically attractive, the film, on its surface, does have a lot going for it.
The acting is strong. The production design is also meticulous and developed quite well. And the music, too, is an excellent combination of a Greek composer's work and some American rock (in particular, Bob Dylan).
The problem is the script. Without giving too much away, the focal point of the film is based on a heist which is done so vaguely, so much under the viewer's nose, that it is virtually impossible to figure out exactly what the heist even is, much less how those who pulled it off got away with it.
In addition, when one of the heisters is nabbed, we don't see how or under what circumstances that person was caught. It is blithely explained away--again, so vaguely that ultimately the viewer winds up really not caring at all about whether the two leads are romantically involved or not, or what happens to them with the rest of their lives either.
On the plus side, the romantic scenes are actually handled quite well--one woman is involved with two different men and all three actors are fine in their roles when it comes time to engage in male-female relations. But because this is, at its core, a heist film, these scenes, while definitely engaging, unfortunately do not make up for the very skimpy scripting of the heist itself, its planning beforehand, and its aftermath.
Too bad. With a lot more focus on the mechanism of the heist and time actually given onscreen to this central event, this could have been a fine film indeed. As it is, it suffers from underdeveloped writing.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
|
|
|
