Amazon.com: Ghost of War: The Sinking of the Awa Maru and Japanese-American Relations,1945-1995 (9781557501592): Roger Dingman: Books

Buy Used
Used - Very Good See details
$11.99 & eligible for FREE Super Saver Shipping on orders over $25. Details

or
Sign in to turn on 1-Click ordering.
 
   
Have one to sell? Sell yours here
Ghost of War: The Sinking of the Awa Maru and Japanese-American Relations,1945-1995
 
See larger image
 
Tell the Publisher!
I'd like to read this book on Kindle

Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.

Ghost of War: The Sinking of the Awa Maru and Japanese-American Relations,1945-1995 [Hardcover]

Roger Dingman (Author)
3.0 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (2 customer reviews)


Available from these sellers.



Book Description

November 1997
Here for the first time is the full story of America's greatest error in the submarine war against Japan and the effect it has had on Japanese-American relations ever since. On the night of 1 April 1945, the USS Queenfish sank the Awa maru, sending more than two thousand men, women, and children to their deaths. The attack occurred despite the United States's guarantee of safe passage to the ship as a carrier of food and medicine to American and Allied prisoners of war. Washington promised to indemnify Tokyo for destroying the passenger-cargo vessel, yet not one penny was paid to the Japanese after the war, and Americans soon forgot about the tragedy. For the Japanese, however, it became a symbol of their victimization in and recovery from the Pacific war. Fluent in Japanese, Roger Dingman draws on extensive archival sources and interviews in Japan and America to tell why this error occurred, what the U.S. Navy and the two governments did to put the disaster behind them, and how radically different American and Japanese public memories of the Pacific war emerged from it. He shows how competition between American and Japanese would-be salvagers of the ship and the treasure it allegedly carried led to the perpetuation of contradictory and flawed understandings of the war.

Product Details

  • Hardcover: 416 pages
  • Publisher: US Naval Institute Press; First Printing edition (November 1997)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 1557501599
  • ISBN-13: 978-1557501592
  • Product Dimensions: 9.3 x 6.3 x 1.2 inches
  • Shipping Weight: 1.5 pounds
  • Average Customer Review: 3.0 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (2 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #2,947,896 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

More About the Author

Discover books, learn about writers, read author blogs, and more.

 

Customer Reviews

2 Reviews
5 star:    (0)
4 star:
 (1)
3 star:    (0)
2 star:
 (1)
1 star:    (0)
 
 
 
 
 
Average Customer Review
3.0 out of 5 stars (2 customer reviews)
 
 
 
 
Share your thoughts with other customers:
Most Helpful Customer Reviews

1 of 1 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars Morally obtuse, December 26, 2006
This review is from: Ghost of War: The Sinking of the Awa Maru and Japanese-American Relations,1945-1995 (Hardcover)
In the foggy night of April 1, 1945, a large Japanese passenger-cargo liner, loaded to the Plimsoll line, raced past the coast of Fukien province in China. The American submarine Queenfish tracked her by radar and sonar and launched torpedoes that sank the Awa maru.

One man survived. Two thousand military experts, bureaucrats and camp followers did not, including some children. Also lost were tons of tin, rubber and other military cargo.

It was not supposed to happen that way. The Awa maru had sailed south on an American safe conduct to deliver food and medical supplies to Allied prisoners of war in Southeast Asia.

The Japanese were not supposed to load the ship with desperately needed military specialists and critical materials, but they did. The Americans were not supposed to sink her, but they did.

Roger Dingman's exhaustive history explains how the story of the Awa maru came to be understood so differently in America and in Japan.

Actually, though there was no attempt at a cover-up, the Awa maru was soon forgotten in America, though it was labeled (by Navy officers) the "biggest mistake" of the undersea offensive in the Pacific.

It was different in Japan, where the loss of the Awa maru was incessantly publicized to promote nationalism.

Dingman enthusiastically agrees that the Japanese nation was a victim in the war, a strange proposition. As far as I know, the only Japanese victim during the war was Hotsumi Ozaki, the spy who tipped off Richard Sorge and was executed.

But even before it is possible to play the victimization game, Dingman must show that America violated international law, intentionally or by error; but neither he nor the other modern Pufendorfs can say what law.

Dingman's narrative makes it clear (except to him) that the ship sailed under a contract, not a law. The Japanese defaulted even before the Awa maru sailed north.

That should have freed America of its obligations, but the question is moot. America agreed not to molest a mercy ship. On April 1, 1945, no such ship existed.

Except, of course, the Americans didn't know that. They thought Awa maru was a warship. And so it was.

But the story is full of ironies.

The Japanese made a big to-do over the sinking, demanding reparations. The Americans, nervous about what retaliation the Japanese might take against prisoners of war, promised payment. Dingman considers the Japanese claims "legitimate" and faults both the American and the Japanese governments for evading them.

Considering the intent of the voyage of the Awa maru -- to help kill even more helpless people -- any compensation would have been an outrage to decency.

Dingman calls the agreement that scotched reparations "morally flawed." He explicitly denies that governments can, or should, be guided by moral concepts: "Pursuit of national interest, even if it means sacrificing particular goals, is much more important (than justice)."

Is it necessary to point out the error in that sentence? It shouldn't be, but since Dingman's attitude mirrors that of many leftist historians, it is well to spell it out: Governments have no independent existence apart from the people in the state; therefore, they can have no moral standards apart form them, either.

It is not surprising to find such moral hollowness; nor is it unusual to find this kind of political correctness in a California academic.

But it is mighty surprising to find it being published by the Naval Institute Press, which has published many critical studies of American behavior in World War II and has been the most important conduit for translations into English of Japanese assessments of the war.

But heretofore the press has kept its head. In "Ghost of War" it loses it.

It is a shame, too, but the diligent Professor Dingman has amassed such a smothering amount of information about the Awa maru that the reader can draw his own conclusions. Few, I bet, will agree with Dingman's.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


5 of 10 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars A riveting story. I couldn't put it down., September 20, 1998
By A Customer
This review is from: Ghost of War: The Sinking of the Awa Maru and Japanese-American Relations,1945-1995 (Hardcover)
Professor Dingman spins a compelling narrative of the accidental sinking of a Japanese merchant ship sailing under safe passage negotiated clandestinely by the U.S. and Japan during the last part of WWII. Much wider implications include causal factors relating to the whole issue of the nature of the war in the Pacific as presented in such works as Craig Cameron's American Samurai, John Dower's War without Mercy, Gerald Linderman's World within War and the rest of the literature on racism and predatory warfare. Beyond the nature of war, however, Dr Dingman deals with the myths that linger, especially the way societies recreate their memories of war. Almost as soon as the sinking occurred the creation of different, divergent public memories of the incident in both countries would spoil the well to such an extent that a rift between private and public factions in both would allow a third party, China (PRC), to reap the benefits of salvage. Here the works on the creation of public myth, like Marling and Wetenhall's Iwo Jima, resonate. The multi-archival approach Dr Dingman can use because of his fluency in Japanese is employed at not only the highest levels, in the tradition of Ernest May, Akira Iriye, and Waldo Heinrichs, but also at the level of the common man employed by diplomatic historians like Michael Hunt who in his seminal The Making of a Special Relationship, explores popular culture as well. A gripping tale, heard to put down, this book has lessons for us not only about World War Two, but the lingering myths and malaise of Vietnam.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No

Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
 
 
 
Only search this product's reviews



Tags Customers Associate with This Product

 (What's this?)
Click on a tag to find related items, discussions, and people.
 

Your tags: Add your first tag
 

Sell a Digital Version of This Book in the Kindle Store

If you are a publisher or author and hold the digital rights to a book, you can sell a digital version of it in our Kindle Store. Learn more

Customer Discussions

This product's forum
Discussion Replies Latest Post
No discussions yet

Ask questions, Share opinions, Gain insight
Start a new discussion
Topic:
First post:
Prompts for sign-in
 


Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
Search all Amazon discussions
   
Related forums


Listmania!


Create a Listmania! list

So You'd Like to...


Create a guide


Look for Similar Items by Category


Look for Similar Items by Subject