Have one to sell? Sell yours here
The Ghosts of Hopewell: Setting the Record Straight in the Lindberg Case
 
 
Tell the Publisher!
I'd like to read this book on Kindle

Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.

The Ghosts of Hopewell: Setting the Record Straight in the Lindberg Case [Paperback]

Professor Jim Fisher Ph.D. B.A. (Author)
3.6 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (20 customer reviews)


Available from these sellers.


Formats

Amazon Price New from Used from
Hardcover --  
Paperback --  

Book Description

September 12, 2006

In this illustrated examination of the Lindbergh kidnapping case, Jim Fisher seeks to set the record straight regarding Bruno Hauptmann's guilt in "the crime of the century."

In February 1935, following a sensational, six-week trial, a jury in Flemington, New Jersey, found German carpenter Hauptmann guilty of kidnapping and murdering the twenty-month-old son of Charles and Anne Lindbergh. Although circumstantial, the evidence against Hauptmann—the handwriting on the ransom notes, the homemade kidnapping ladder, Colonel Lindbergh's money found in his garage, his matching the description of the man who accepted the ransom payoff in the Bronx cemetery, his inability to prove an alibi, and his incredible explanation of his possession of the ransom money—was overwhelming, leaving few to doubt his guilt. After a series of appeals and stays, Hauptmann died fourteen months later in the electric chair. A confession would have spared him the death sentence, but Hauptmann chose to die maintaining his innocence.

It was not until the mid-1970s that revisionists began to challenge the conventional wisdom in the case: that Hauptmann was the lone killer. Revisionist books and articles appeared, as did plays, TV shows, and a movie, all portraying Hauptmann as the victim of a massive police and prosecution frame-up.

At this point, the focus shifted from the evidence to the conduct of the police. By the 1980s, most people familiar with the case were convinced of Hauptmann's complete innocence. Many denied the murder, believing that the Lindbergh baby remained alive. Several men claimed to be the firstborn son of Charles and Anne Lindbergh, one of whom sued to claim his share of the Lindbergh estate after Charles Lindbergh's death in 1974.

Another group held that the kidnapping was an elaborate hoax to cover up the murder of the baby by his parents. Anna Hauptmann¹s series of federal lawsuits against New Jersey and others in the mid-1980s fueled further interest in the case. Although Hauptmann's widow lost all of her lawsuits, she had won the hearts and minds of the American people before her death at the age of ninety-four.

Former FBI agent Fisher discusses the hard evidence, such as the ransom notes and the wood of the kidnapping ladder. He analyzes and debunks the various revisionist theories and presents new evidence that, coupled with the undisputed facts, prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Hauptmann was guilty as charged: he kidnapped and murdered the infant son of Charles and Anne Lindbergh.



Editorial Reviews

Amazon.com Review

The sad story of Charles Lindbergh's baby, kidnapped and murdered at the height of America's love affair with its aviator hero, is common knowledge, as is the scandal and corruption surrounding the conviction and execution of Bruno Hauptmann for that crime. In The Ghosts of Hopewell, Jim Fisher tells us another story, one more surprising in its lack of conspiracy and intrigue. Fisher writes simply, clearly, and with conviction--firmly convinced that Hauptmann was indeed the killer. As he sorts through the evidence, the testimony, the motives, and the crime itself, it becomes clear to the reader, too, that this was not simply a case of corrupt politicians and law enforcement officials trying to put a controversial murder to rest. It was, as believed originally, a case of an unemployed immigrant who saw an opportunity to make a few quick bucks on the brutal murder of the innocent child of America's celebrity of the day. --Lisa Higgins --This text refers to an out of print or unavailable edition of this title.

From Library Journal

The author, a scholar and former FBI special agent, updates his 1987 The Lindbergh Case (Rutgers Univ.) to scrutinize theories on who really was responsible for the Lindbergh kidnapping, concluding that Bruno Hauptmann was indeed guilty. Fisher takes a clear and comprehensive approach to the historical record, physical evidence, the justice system, and commentators both contemporary and more recent, adding his own insights into the never-ending public mania for celebrity and controversy. More photographic evidence could have been used to bolster his arguments, and the grammar could have been more carefully edited. Occasionally, Fisher is a little too quick to dismiss other theorists as cranks without justifying his opinion. In addition, his earlier title and Susan Hertog's Anne Morrow Lindbergh: Her Life (LJ 10/15/99) note an experimental reconstruction by police of the kidnapper's ladder that is not mentioned here. Given the passage of time, the gaps in the evidence, and new forensic techniques, it's not likely that anyone will ever have the final word in a case like this, but Fisher's book provides straightforward coverage of a perennially interesting subject. For all collections.
-Barbara Ann Hutcheson, Greater Victoria P.L., BC
Copyright 1999 Reed Business Information, Inc. --This text refers to an out of print or unavailable edition of this title.

Product Details

  • Paperback: 240 pages
  • Publisher: Southern Illinois University Press; 1st edition (September 12, 2006)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 0809327171
  • ISBN-13: 978-0809327171
  • Product Dimensions: 8.8 x 5.5 x 0.6 inches
  • Shipping Weight: 10.4 ounces
  • Average Customer Review: 3.6 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (20 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #2,077,296 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

More About the Author

Discover books, learn about writers, read author blogs, and more.

 

Customer Reviews

20 Reviews
5 star:
 (9)
4 star:
 (4)
3 star:
 (1)
2 star:
 (2)
1 star:
 (4)
 
 
 
 
 
Average Customer Review
3.6 out of 5 stars (20 customer reviews)
 
 
 
 
Share your thoughts with other customers:
Most Helpful Customer Reviews

19 of 24 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars No baby Lindbergh kidnapping book seems objective..., September 10, 2003
By A Customer
Fisher is as guilty of the same sins he's accusing other authors of: lack of objectivity. This book builds on the author's previous book but continues with the same paradigm right from the beginning - that Hauptman acted by himself and was guilty of the crime.

This particular book would be understood by those who have read the basics of the Lindbergh case. It analyses the various theories developed through time in terms of who committed the crime. He rejects every single theory but, at times, the arguments to do so are full of logical fallacies, such as "such and such could have never happened because if it had then too many people would have sworn to a lie". This type of rebuttal is hardly convincing.

Overall, the book is of interest to those who have become serious followers of the case and would like to have a complete bookcase on what has been written about it. Otherwise, it is of relatively low merit.

Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


20 of 27 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars Questions answered and more questions, May 9, 2003
By 
Paul Eckler (princeton jct, nj United States) - See all my reviews
(REAL NAME)   
Author Jim Fisher is a professor in the Department of Political Science and Criminal Justice at Edinboro University of Pennsylvania, and a former FBI agent. His direct, "Just the facts, ma'am," style is crisp and refreshing. In this, his second volume on the Lindbergh kidnaping, he takes on the revisionist theories that have accumulated over the years. He debunks them all and concludes the Bruno Richard Hauptmann did indeed carry out the heinous crime, and that he acted alone.

This book is loaded with details. A few burning questions are answered--

Q. Why was Hauptmann tried in Hunterdon Co., NJ, when Hopewell (where Baby Lindbergh's body was found) lies in Mercer Co?

A. The prosecution theorized that Baby Lindbergh was killed in or near his crib in the Lindbergh residence, which is near Hopewell, but just over the county line in E. Amwell, Hunterdon Co.

Q. Just under $15K of the $50K ransom was recovered. What happened to the rest of the money?

A. After the ransom was paid Hauptmann gradually became a big spender buying nice things for his wife and himself with what he claimed were profits earned on Wall Street. Records indicate over $26K deposited to his accounts after the ransom was paid. He probably was able to launder the money and spend it undetected.

Ransom notes, the first left in the baby's room, used a symbol and three hole punch pattern that firmly linked the ransom payment to the kidnaping-ruling out numerous imposters.

The baby's autopsy was performed at Walter Swayze's Funeral Home in Trenton, with mortician Swayze, county coroner, functioning under the direction of Dr. Charles H. Mitchell, the Mercer County physician.

Three days after the ransom was paid, April 5, President Roosevelt called in all gold bullion, coins, and gold notes. This made the ransom money, all but $14K in gold notes, easier to spot once everyone else traded in their gold notes. The serial numbers of the ransom money was published in a fifty-seven page ransom book. The Federal Reserve Bank of New York was asked to check the serial numbers of all incoming gold certificates against the list (suggesting that money spent as near as Princeton or Hopewell-which use the Philadelphia Federal Reserve Bank-was never checked).

John Condon's (the man who paid the ransom for Col. Lindbergh) phone number and address were found pencilled on a board in Hauptman's house. He did not deny he wrote it.

The Museum of the New Jersey State Police in W. Trenton has the kidnap ladder and the serial number list of the ransom money on display. The Hauptmann case was the subject of repeated lawsuits by Mrs. Hauptmann. As a result, the State Police site continues to house the Lindbergh Collection consisting of 200K documents, 518 pieces of physical evidence, 300 court exhibits, and hundreds of photographs, all completely indexed on 35K name and subject cards, now computerized.

In 1985, 23K Lindbergh case documents that had been collected by Gov. Harold G. Hoffman were discovered in a garage in S. Amboy, NJ.

The kidnaper's vehicle was apparently parked near the Lindbergh residence on Featherbed Lane facing West (considering the location of the body). Two sets of muddy footprints, both wearing burlap bags, leading off in a southeasterly direction were found near the base of the ladder. These muddy footprints were not conclusively shown to be connected to the crime, but if Hauptmann acted alone, he must have made two trips-perhaps one with the baby and one with the ladder. Leaving the ladder, which had been specially constructed to collapse and fit into an automobile, was one of his biggest mistakes, as it provided key evidence connecting him with the crime.

It's a miracle that any of the external evidence survived. Charles Lindbergh was the most famous man in America at the time. Once word of the crime leaked out, reporters and sightseers mobbed the site trampling much of the evidence-such as tire tracks--long before it could be examined in the light of day. Police were unable to secure the site. They could protect only a few fragments.

Over the objections of Col. H. Norman Schwartzkopf of the NJ State Police, Col. Lindbergh hired three from the New York City underworld to look for his child. They were Mickey Rosner, Irving Bitz, and Salvatore Spitale. This effort was unsuccessful, but they may have seen the kidnap note with its secret symbol. This information could have allowed others in the world of crime to mimic the symbol and collect the ransom.

The Hopewell, NJ, area now is largely country estates. At the time of the kidnaping, it was farmland. The roads were not well marked and do not follow logical patterns. To have succeeded, Hauptmann must have spent time in the area. You would think his car would have been noticed on the night of the kidnaping.

Of course, Hauptmann was a carpenter and the Lindbergh Mansion was recently constructed and still being landscaped. He could easily have asked for directions without raising suspicion in the weeks prior to the kidnaping. He is known to have visited the Rockefeller Center job site looking for work during the Depression. He could have learned of the Lindbergh mansion construction project or even visited it while looking for work.

One story connecting Hauptmann with the area was told by Father Michael J. Kallok, a Slovak-Catholic Priest, who had been pastor of St. Michael's Church in Trenton from Nov, 1926 to Oct, 1931. He claimed to have seen Hauptmann at a riding stable northeast of Trenton called "The Willows." He also knew Elvert Carlstrom, who testified at Hauptmann's trial, whom he believed was involved in the illegal transportation of whiskey. At The Willow's he once saw a man named Schumann and Hauptmann looking over plans of the Lindbergh mansion. Fisher was unable to verify this story.

On June 10, 1932, Violet Sharpe, a servant in the Lindbergh/Morrow household committed suicide (by drinking "cyanide chloride" silver polish) when the police threatened to take her in for more questioning. She has not been shown to have any connection with the kidnaping. She probably buckled under intense questioning-fearing that she might be fired if her employer learned she had visited a speakeasy.

It was well known that the kidnaper spoke with a German accent. Some have read strong anti-German sentiments into the trial. Stories of ugly, blood-thirsty, anti-German mobs calling for Hauptmann's death are exaggerated. Similarly, one theory holds that the farmers of Hopewell conspired to commit the kidnaping to discourage gentrification of the area by patricians such as the Lindberghs. Mrs. Hauptmann participated in Nazi rallies to raise funds for Hauptmann's defense in German communities across the country. One she visited is Milwaukee.

When psychologists evaluated Hauptmann, they concluded he was sane, but he was characterized as naive, foolhardy, simple minded, cruel, argumentative, secretive, egomaniac, and a sociopath. He was found to suffer from a type of agraphia which caused him to affix an extra "e" to some words-unless he consciously avoided the tic. This tic is additional evidence he wrote the ransom notes.

Ransom money was found hidden in Hauptmann's house and garage behind wooden fixtures. A false floor under the garage revealed a jar containing water and traces of mothballs. Most of the money is thought to have been stored there at one time, where it had been protected from insects and vermin by mothballs. Apparently it had gotten wet with groundwater. Hence, Hauptmann's story that Isidor Fisch had given him a box for safekeeping that he opened and found to be filled with money after it got wet from a leaking roof.

A small bottle of ether was found in Hauptmann's garage. Investigation revealed it had been purchased after the kidnaping, but there is speculation that ether or chloroform may have been used to quiet the baby during the kidnaping. Some suggest Hauptmann was planning a second kidnaping at the time of his arrest, because his money trove was beginning to run low.

In the end, Hauptmann was determined to be a habitual criminal. He worked as a carpenter in good times, but in bad times he had come to rely on crime as a source of income. He had a criminal record in Germany. He was an illegal alien. Kidnaping was a common crime at the time. It is not surprising that Hauptmann selected it as a means to supplement his income.

Unanswered questions: Did Hauptmann return to the scene of the crime to recover the baby's clothing to mail it to Condon? Or did he keep part of the clothing for that purpose when he buried the baby? Who laundered the clothing?

Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


11 of 15 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars Unnecessary Rebuttal, January 25, 2005
By 
Fisher's first book was clearly a better work. This second book appears to be nothing more than Fisher's response to his many critics. It is very brief with only a thumbnail sketch of the case. I think this would have been better as a magazine article than a full book.

Additionally, Fisher makes some Herculean leaps in logic. The finding of a bottle of Ether produced after the date of the kidnapping, i.e. March 1, 1932, forms the basis of a claim by Fisher that Hauptmann was planning to kidnap again. The leap is just too great.

To his credit, Fisher does debunk many of the great fallacies of this case, especially concerning the ladder and wood evidence. Nevertheless, I think this book was unnecessary and Fisher should have just let his first book do the talking for him.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No

Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
 
 
 
Most Recent Customer Reviews











Only search this product's reviews



Inside This Book (learn more)
Browse Sample Pages:
Front Cover | Table of Contents | First Pages | Index | Back Cover | Surprise Me!
Search Inside This Book:


What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?


Suggested Tags from Similar Products

 (What's this?)
Be the first one to add a relevant tag (keyword that's strongly related to this product).
 
(1)

Your tags: Add your first tag
 

Sell a Digital Version of This Book in the Kindle Store

If you are a publisher or author and hold the digital rights to a book, you can sell a digital version of it in our Kindle Store. Learn more

Customer Discussions

This product's forum
Discussion Replies Latest Post
No discussions yet

Ask questions, Share opinions, Gain insight
Start a new discussion
Topic:
First post:
Prompts for sign-in
 


Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
Search all Amazon discussions
   
Related forums



So You'd Like to...


Create a guide


Look for Similar Items by Category


Look for Similar Items by Subject