Currently unavailable.
We don't know when or if this item will be back in stock.

Have one to sell? Sell on Amazon

Giant Extra Large Beer Glass

4 out of 5 stars 3 customer reviews

Currently unavailable.
We don't know when or if this item will be back in stock.
Currently unavailable. We don't know when or if this item will be back in stock.

Product Details

  • ASIN: B000SR0J2Y
  • Average Customer Review: 4.0 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (3 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #524,588 in Kitchen & Dining (See Top 100 in Kitchen & Dining)
  • Product Warranty: For warranty information about this product, please click here

Customer Reviews

Top Customer Reviews

I really enjoy this glass. It's made out of a cheaper material, but I feel like the size makes up for that (if you're looking for a fancier glass I would buy something else). It's claim to hold five beers is flat out false, mine only holds four. With that being said, four beers is still a fair amount, and it's a cheap glass that I enjoy using often.
Comment 1 of 1 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
Verified Purchase
The glass does NOT fit five 12 ounce beers. I'm not sure why they would say this, it's not even close to a 60 ounce glass. The product's box even repeats the claim that it fits five beers. Outside of this claim it is a decent glass but I really wish the glass was as big as it said it was. I'd be wary of buying from HomeWetBar again.
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
Verified Purchase
I have to admit... I don't drink beer.... I actually bought this for Tea... I love the way it's insulated... I can fill it up with ice and tea and the ice doesn't melt fast at all....
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse