Amazon.com: Customer Reviews: Gladiator (Two-Disc Collector's Edition)

Customer Reviews


1,748 Reviews
5 star:
 (1,104)
4 star:
 (259)
3 star:
 (125)
2 star:
 (112)
1 star:
 (148)
 
 
 
 
 
Average Customer Review
Share your thoughts with other customers
Create your own review
 
 
Only search this product's reviews

The most helpful favorable review
The most helpful critical review


314 of 377 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars We salute you, Ridley.
Gladiatorial combat is immortalized in this film, the only way it can be: through stunning action sequences and beautiful imagery. It also immortalizes, above all, director Ridley Scott.

Roger Ebert complains of people with short memory spans praising this film while forgetting that films like Spartacus have supposedly done this before. Well, I have a good memory, and I...

Published on October 30, 2000 by zaloop

› See more 5 star, 4 star reviews
versus
285 of 311 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars WAIT FOR THE RERELEASE
I've just examined some of the fullsize screenshots over at AVS and this 'blu-ray' looks terrible.

It uses DNR and EE throughout.

DNR - In 2008, a lot of studios were using this process. Basically, it digitally 'smudges' the image to hide any evidence of film-grain and, predictably, blu-rays with DNR look like s--t. Most studios have stopped...
Published 3 months ago by Cemetery Mink

› See more 3 star, 2 star, 1 star reviews

‹ Previous | 1 2175| Next ›
Most Helpful First | Newest First

 
285 of 311 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars WAIT FOR THE RERELEASE, August 23, 2009
I've just examined some of the fullsize screenshots over at AVS and this 'blu-ray' looks terrible.

It uses DNR and EE throughout.

DNR - In 2008, a lot of studios were using this process. Basically, it digitally 'smudges' the image to hide any evidence of film-grain and, predictably, blu-rays with DNR look like s--t. Most studios have stopped using DNR. But Paramount, apparently, is continuing to release this smudgy garbage and trying to pass it off as 'high definition'
(If you want the DNR experience at home; you can get the same effect by smearing vaseline all over your TV set. Yes, that's about what it looks like)

EE - Edge Enhancement; in DVD days, when everyone was watching on tiny televisions, studios would use EE which basically messes with the colors a bit and adds bright white halos all around the edges ('enhances' them) That might have made sense on a 10" screen, but on a decent sized television it looks terrible.

There should be a proper release of this soon. Wait for that.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews  
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


 
245 of 269 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars A Total Mess, August 23, 2009
This review refers to the blu-ray picture quality only. The movie itself is an absolute classic. Unfortunately this blu-ray was a victim of considerable DNR and EE that has actually removed and distorted picture detail. Here's a good example. At the beginning of the movie where we see Maximus as a General leading a final battle, you see an amazing wide shot of flying, flaming, arrows. It should look amazing, right? Wrong. The picture was DNR'd so badly that it actually removed arrows and the ones you can see are a blurred mess! Absolutely terrible. Don't waste your money on this. Wait until they release a quality blu-ray because "this is not it!"
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews  
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


 
180 of 203 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars DO NOT BUY WARNING!!!, August 23, 2009
By Don Dougherty (Halifax, NS) - See all my reviews
(REAL NAME)   
This movie has been ruined by DNR and EE. Do not support studios ruining the picture of movies through noise reduction and artificial sharpening. They think they can take the easy way out and upscale and DNR and EE the DVD version then sell it to you for $30+. IF YOU BUY THIS YOU ARE BEING SCREWED BY THESE CROOKS.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews  
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


 
37 of 40 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars Classic movie - defective release, August 31, 2009
By Adam Clotfelter (Colorado Springs, USA) - See all my reviews
(REAL NAME)   
The version about to be released on 2009-09-01 is defective. Picture quality is from the 2000 DVD master. I would advise waiting until an updated release is made available, don't let them make you pay twice!!
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews  
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


 
37 of 40 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars Horrible Transfer, August 28, 2009
By Tromaboy "oversights" (Seattle, WA USA) - See all my reviews
Universal/Paramount really botched this transfer the extended scenes look fine but the theatrical footage uses the same transfer as the DVD I'd wait for another edition.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews  
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


 
314 of 377 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars We salute you, Ridley., October 30, 2000
By "zaloop" (Walpole, MA USA) - See all my reviews
Gladiatorial combat is immortalized in this film, the only way it can be: through stunning action sequences and beautiful imagery. It also immortalizes, above all, director Ridley Scott.

Roger Ebert complains of people with short memory spans praising this film while forgetting that films like Spartacus have supposedly done this before. Well, I have a good memory, and I remember Spartacus. In fact, I kept on remembering that film while watching Gladiator, only in the context of, "This is so much better than Spartacus. It goes beyond." The action is better, the visuals are better, the story is better, and the acting is better. Sorry, Kirk.

Since this is an action film, the story isn't the most important element, but for an action film it is actually quite good. For one thing, I liked the disturbing under-the-surface incest element going on between Commodus and Connie Nielson. Furthermore, it was interesting to see how Crowe gained support among the gladiators until it became as if he were a general leading his army again. The plot itself needed to be there in order to fully create a sense of grandeur. With its insurrection story, the rise of the hero and his trek to the capitol of Rome, and the look at the people in power, the plot creates a sense of time-and-place necessary for an epic that couldn't exist with the visuals and action alone.

The acting is among the best one can ever seen for an action film, and there is plenty of fine dramatic work pulled off by the two main actors. Russell Crowe is now one of the best "new" (four or five films so far) actors in film. We believe, in his glances and the ways he delivers his many great lines, that he is Maximus. He is poignant, hate-filled, and sorrowful all at once. The praise he is getting is deserved. But why isn't Phoenix being lauded just as much? He carries the film in the second-largest role just as well as Crowe. His Emperor Commodus isn't a good villain and has no real character, but Phoenix adds so many layers to him and turns him into a great antagonist that that alone makes his performance excellent. He commands attention just as Crowe does. All by himself (no help from any great dialogue or development), he creates a villain that is prissy, whining, ambitious, pathetic, and malevolent, and worthy of our hate as well as our pity. It's a wonderful transformation. To sum it up, the characters themselves aren't really developed at all- but the acting is so good that it seems they are.

Now, onto the action, which, as I had hoped, is plentiful and intense. It has diversity and grandeur. All the fights were fast, hard-hitting, uncensored, and very bloody, which is what they should've been like. And every single fight sequence is unique from the others. There's the match where two men fought chained to each other, the opening war battle, Maximus vs. numerous other fighters, and the final sword duel, to name a few. This is so much more than just two half-naked men fighting with swords, which is what it could've been. The film also captures the feel and the motion of combat. Ridley Scott speeds up the film slightly during fight scenes to show the chaos and rapid reflexes necessary to survive. During the fight scenes, the camerawork is nonstop and covers the combat as one big blur to the fighters. (But we can still follow the fights themselves.)

This film also stands out in my mind as one of the most visual, image-driven action films I've ever seen. Thanks to Ridley Scott, practically every scene is jammed with wonderful detail, art direction, even distinct lighting (the Collosseum orange, other parts of Rome dark blue). Just look at the wide multitude (seemingly infinite number) of battle masks, weapons, and locales. Cinematography is skillful and impressive. There are tons of memorable shots, like Maximus entering the ring with rose petals coming down on him like rain from above, Commodus' pure white battle costume (when he's being risen up on the platform he looks like a demented angel ascending to heaven), and the images used to represent Crowe's home- the gentle hand carressing the wheat reeds, the door to his house, etc. They had a surreal quality and each were bathed in their own distinct color. Excellent work, Ridley.

A very impressive film. So why can't all summer movies be this good? We'd be spoiled.

Help other customers find the most helpful reviews  
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


 
52 of 60 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars AVOID this BD Release of Gladiator!, August 23, 2009
The picture is extremely shoddy in this Blu-Ray release! Avoid like the plague, so the studio gets the idea! What the heck is the studio doing releasing this atrocious transfer on BD when the movie itself is such a great one? Unbelievable! A movie like this should have a flawless transfer! Argh!
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews  
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


 
50 of 58 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars overprocessed video look on Blu Ray, August 23, 2009
By M. Hafner (Switzerland) - See all my reviews
(REAL NAME)   
Instead of giving us the existing HD master with a high bit rate we get a reprocessed
version on Blu Ray with thick halos from sharpening and a waxy look with fine detail
gone thanks to digital noise filtering. Well done indeed. What a let down.
Details here
[...]
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews  
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


 
33 of 37 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars A missed opportunity, August 31, 2009
By Ralph Jenkins (Manassas, VA) - See all my reviews
(REAL NAME)   
Gladiator was one of the most anticipated titles on Blu-ray, but this release comes from an old master (used for the DVD in 2000) and suffers from too much DNR (digital noise reduction, which smudges detail) and edge enhancement (outlines around edges). In fact, there are details present on the DVD that are missing from the Blu-ray. On the other hand, Braveheart (released on Blu-ray on the same day) has a fantastic picture and makes Gladiator look even worse. The best thing to do is to pick up Braveheart (if you like the movie, of course) and wait for the eventual re-release of Gladiator.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews  
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


 
33 of 37 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars BLU RAY VERSION IS WORTHLESS-SAVE YOUR MONEY, August 28, 2009
The BLU RAY version is a mess. The flaming arrows disappear, the other details in the opening scene are destroyed due to improper use of noise reduction, the faces look as though waxed over, EXCEPT for SOME of the extended portions that were added to the theater version, which are okay and better than those portions in the original release shown in theaters. Appearantly, this movie done without re-creating a master version from using actual ENTIRE film. Cancel your pre-ORDER ASAP, and keep your regular DVDs as the upscaling standard DVD is MUCH better.

Gladiator in blu ray a rip-off, and those resposnible should be fired. Maybe a class action lawsuit should be filed (however Braveheart is a good one in blu ray)
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews  
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


‹ Previous | 1 2175| Next ›
Most Helpful First | Newest First
Recent discussions in the Gladiator (Two-Disc Collector's Edition) forum  
   
 

This product

Gladiator (Two-Disc Collector's Edition)
Gladiator (Two-Disc Collector's Edition) by Russell Crowe (DVD - 2000)
Used & New from: $2.26
Add to wishlist See buying options
204 used & new from $2.26
     
 
Customers who viewed this item also viewed
Braveheart
Braveheart by Mel Gibson (DVD - 2000)
4.6 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (890)   
151 used & new from $2.45

Forrest Gump (Two-Disc Special Collector's Edition)
4.3 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (592)   
Buy new$14.98 $8.49
In Stock
178 used & new from $2.39

The Lord of the Rings: The Motion Picture Trilogy (Theatrical Editions) [Blu-ray]
1.5 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (1,155)   
Buy new$99.98 $69.99
Available for Pre-order
 
     
     
 
Customer Communities
 
     

Where's My Stuff?

Shipping & Returns

Need Help?

Conditions of Use | Privacy Notice © 1996-2009, Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates