From Publishers Weekly
Those irrepressible congressional gadflies, the Tolchins, begin their brief study of ethics on Capitol Hill with a surprise announcement: "Lawmakers are more honest and more ethical today than ever before." This is not, the authors hasten to add, because current legislators are better people than those of the past. Rather, it's because their actions have become more transparent each lives inside a "glass house." The Tolchins (Susan, a public policy professor, and Martin, editor of the Hill, a newspaper covering Congress) focus most of their attention on the years since 1974, when a slew of new ethics laws were passed in the wake of Watergate, and especially on the years since 1994, when Newt Gingrich became speaker of the House and launched his "scorched earth" strategy of moralistic politics. During this period, the Tolchins argue, notions of corruption expanded enormously. The standard practice of one generation became criminal to the next. But even as standards of conduct evolved, the Tolchins believe that Congress has remained reluctant to investigate members unless its hand is forced by the media and public opinion. "Loyalty is a more closely held virtue than ethical conduct," the authors maintain. This is largely because members of Congress never know whom the spotlight will turn on next (Gingrich, the Tolchins point out, was destroyed by the same obsessive scandalmongering he used to ruin others). To bolster their arguments, the authors cite a wide array of case histories, which at its worst resembles a "greatest hits" list of newspaper headlines: Keating 5, Abscam, Wright, Packwood, Torricelli. At its best, however, the Tolchins' slim book is an adroit, convincing examination of the ethical pressures and problems that continue to confront our representatives in Congress. (Oct.) Forecast: This should attract some attention and sales in the capital, where the authors will promote it; they will also have a radio satellite tour.
Copyright 2001 Cahners Business Information, Inc.
--This text refers to an out of print or unavailable edition of this title.
The authors--she's a college professor; he's a former
New York Times reporter, now editor and publisher of the
Hill--have written previously on subjects like political patronage, deregulation, and voter rage. Here, they examine the transformation of Congress' ethics process from a seldom-exercised restraint on truly egregious behavior into a lethal, partisan political tool. Newt Gingrich made ethics a weapon--most notably in forcing Democratic House Speaker Jim Wright to resign--but became a victim of that same weapon. There was no formal congressional ethics process until the '60s; Representative Adam Clayton Powell and LBJ aide Bobby Baker were handled on an ad hoc basis (as was Joe McCarthy a decade earlier). The Tolchins discuss Abscam, the Keating Five, the Gingrich era's "new rules," the Packwood and Torricelli investigations, and numerous other cases. The current "politics of venom" distorts legitimate ethical concerns, the Tolchins argue, at a time when members of Congress are more dedicated and honest than at any time in the past.
Mary CarrollCopyright © American Library Association. All rights reserved
--This text refers to an out of print or unavailable edition of this title.