Add to Cart
Sign in to turn on 1-Click ordering.

More Buying Choices
Add to Cart
& FREE Shipping. Details
Sold by: Kellards
Add to Cart
& FREE Shipping. Details
Sold by: JZS Camera & Electronics
Have one to sell? Sell on Amazon

Image Unavailable

Image not available for
  • Sorry, this item is not available in
  • Image not available
  • To view this video download Flash Player

Glidecam HD-2000 Hand-Held Stabilizer

| 3 answered questions

List Price: $499.00
Price: $493.00 & FREE Shipping. Details
You Save: $6.00 (1%)
Only 8 left in stock.
Sold by aSavings and Fulfilled by Amazon. Gift-wrap available.
Want it tomorrow, April 25? Order within and choose One-Day Shipping at checkout. Details
  • Hand-Held Stabilizer
8 new from $478.00 2 used from $445.00

Frequently Bought Together

Glidecam HD-2000 Hand-Held Stabilizer + Manfrotto 3433PL 577 Rapid Connect Adapter with Sliding Mounting Plate + NEEWER® CN-160 160PCS LED Dimmable Ultra High Power Panel Digital Camera / Camcorder Video Light, LED Light for Canon, Nikon, Pentax, Panasonic, SONY, Samsung and Olympus Digital SLR Cameras
Price for all three: $572.94

Buy the selected items together

Special Offers and Product Promotions

  • Buy Used and Save: Buy a Used "Glidecam HD-2000 Hand-Held Stabilizer" and save 10% off the $499.00 list price. Buy with confidence as the condition of this item and its timely delivery are guaranteed under the "Amazon A-to-z Guarantee". See all Used offers.
  • Six-Month Financing: For a limited time, purchase $149 or more using the Amazon.com Store Card and pay no interest for 6 months on your entire order if paid in full in 6 months. Interest will be charged to your account from the purchase date if the promotional balance is not paid in full within 6 months. Minimum monthly payments required. Subject to credit approval. 1-Click and phone orders do not apply. See complete details and restrictions.

Product Details

  • Product Dimensions: 5 x 9 x 17 inches ; 6.8 pounds
  • Shipping Weight: 8 pounds (View shipping rates and policies)
  • Shipping: This item is also available for shipping to select countries outside the U.S.
  • ASIN: B0020LB0MO
  • Item model number: HD-2000
  • Average Customer Review: 4.7 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (49 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Best Sellers Rank:
  • Date first available at Amazon.com: October 2, 2001

Product Description

Hand-Held Stabilizer

Customer Questions & Answers

Customer Reviews

4.7 out of 5 stars
5 star
4 star
3 star
2 star
1 star
See all 49 customer reviews
This device takes a lot of practice and a lot of time to balance.
As far as i'm concerned, it's worth every penny just because of how much time it saves you on set.
I would say nearly any size DSLR and a variety of lenses would pair well with the HD-2000.
J. Van Wagenen

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

23 of 25 people found the following review helpful By matt wolfe [cc] on July 5, 2011
Verified Purchase
Looking to give more fluid movement to your videos? I definitely like this if you are shooting on an HDSLR setup like the Canon/Nikon/Panasonic/Sony DSLRs that are real popular in video right now.

For a video example (and since Amazon won't allow external links), simply click on my profile, click on my website, go to the VIDEO dropdown, click on BABY VIDEOS, and look for the video BABY LIAM. It was shot with this Glidecam 2000, the Canon EOS 7D 18 MP CMOS Digital SLR Camera with 3-inch LCD (Body Only), and the Canon EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM Lens for Canon DSLR Cameras.

Obviously if you are using a setup like this, focus control is an issue - to which I simply recommend setting your lens to focus on infinity to give you the longest focal field achievable with your lens, and step back away from the subject. If that is not possible, at least get a lens with a large focus ring and plan out your shot BEFORE you press record.

But for the Glidecam 2000. As with every review, you must consider management of expectations. Once you see a product in relation to what else is out there and what else costs whatever, then you can really see where the product exists.

-You have to readjust weight if you add or take parts off your rig, such as changing lenses, adding or removing an eternal mic, etc. This can be time-consuming.
Read more ›
1 Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
10 of 10 people found the following review helpful By aceofbase on July 14, 2011
Verified Purchase
I got the HD2000 for use in home/family videos so did not want a very expensive solution. The 2000 is a good size for my gripped 7D, rode SVM, and I use 10-22 and 24-105 lenses they balance nicely. I use a manfrotto 394 quick release plate, it is a sturdy plate that releases the camera quickly and easily because the lever is on the side. It also has a built in fluid level which aids in balancing. I bolted a stack of small washers to the glidecam baseplate so they push up against the 394 and hold it in place (very tightly too).

Setup with the glidecam is tricky there is no getting around it but the manual is well written and there are lots of videos on youtube. I recommend getting the rig close to the balancing point (weights), then sort the drop time (length of pole/weights), then fine tune the front/back and left/right balancing (with screws). I learnt to balance it by putting the removable pole from the glidecam forearm brace on the edge of a table or bench and prop it up to get the support pole vertical, then while holding the brace against the bench put the glidecam on so that it hangs freely then you can adjuct the front back and side to side screws with the other hand. Once you get the hang of what you are trying to achieve this method is very quick to balance. I make markings on the pole and baseplate for each lens but sometimes have to tweak slightly with each change. With this setup I have the weight pole ~3/4 extended, with 4 weights on each and the 394 attached to the middle hole 3rd from the back.

Using the glidecam is what will take most people some time to master, I still need lots more practice! Countering any back/forwards sway and accurate panning are the trickiest things to start with. I highly recommend getting the forearm brace.
Read more ›
1 Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
3 of 3 people found the following review helpful By Matthew Brando on March 4, 2014
There are LOTS of contenders in the prosumer market for steadi-cams. Glidecam, Merlin, and over-seas guys like Flycam, Wondlan, Laing, X-Cam, Weldy, WHATEVER. There are SO MANY of these products on the market with really the only big dog (until these MOVI's start coming out and down in price) being the 'Glidecam' company.

I am NOT an employee of Glidecam, this is just my experience with them.

I wasted a complete summer last year (2013) trying to build/buy/decide between what steadicam system I wanted to buy.

First was the Johnny Chung Lee 14$ stabilizer. Works GREAT for running, but for slow walking shots or dollies, your hips move and you get slight movements on screen with the camera. So, I couldn't go with this guy and took the parts back to Home Depot. My second purchase was the Wondlan Magic II Stabilizer. It had a cool feature of dropping down and doubling as a monopod, but overall I didn't like the cheap construction (even though it was 'Carbon Fibre') and it didn't glide well with any lens that was above 24mm. (So if you have a heavier lens, you're screwed)

So then I thought about the Flycam, even though I didn't want to buy another 'over-seas' product, fearing for the worse. I had enough money saved up to get the Varizoom FlowPod. Whilst better constructed than the Wondlan, it was even more unbalanced than any of my previous purchases. That guy went back to Adorama ASAP.

I didn't want to do it. I didn't want to shell out 500 dollars to buy a well-reviewed product.

But I did.

And the results were absolutely phenomenal.

The set-up was flawless, thanks to the 'HD' model having individual tuning knobs so balancing is a breeze, and it was easy to store in a Pelican case when you break it apart.
Read more ›
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again

Most Recent Customer Reviews