Vaclav Smil is a brilliant scientist who writes about important issues. His book "Enriching the Earth" is a must-read for anyone who wants to understand how agriculture is able to support 5 to 6 billion humans who otherwise wouldn't be here without fossil-fuel based fertilizers.
So Smil must be aware of the famous 1972 Meadows et al "Limits to Growth" and the field of systems ecology - how energy flows through ecosystems (including human societies). Smil surely must know about disappearing and degraded aquifers, topsoil, forests, fisheries, etc. Clearly ecological limits, a growing human population, and declining energy resources is the largest catastrophe arriving within the next 50 years, and there was almost no attention and/or no scientific evidence offered to refute these imminent catastrophes.
This is an incredibly optimistic book that tries to have its cake and eat it too. On page 75 Smil acknowledges that if we can't get off of cheap oil the results could be "fairly catastrophic", but then he says that perhaps we'll make a transition to natural gas (another finite fossil fuel). Yet two pages later Smil contradicts himself when he explains why natural gas is limited in use for transportation on page 77: natural gas has an energy density 1,000-fold less than oil, and it's costly to transport and store.
I find it hard to believe that Smil doesn't realize that what we face is a liquid fuel crisis. Somehow he missed reading Robert Hirsch's "The Inevitable Peaking of World Oil Production" or Gever's "Beyond Oil: The Threat to Food and Fuel in the Coming Decades" and many other books in his giant references list.
On page 90 Smil says that "the supply of fossil fuels is adequate for generations to come" but there's no citation to support that. Though if the population goes from 7 billion to 1 billion as oil, coal, and natural gas are used up, then there will be oil for generations to come from the collapsed demand, but surely 6 billion people dying counts as a catastrophe?
At least Smil has some skepticism about some kinds of alternative energy - he explains why auto fuel cells are not going to happen on pages 89-90, fusion has no chance within 50 years on page 89, fission is unlikely on page 89, that wind and solar are too unevenly distributed to be a solution on page 86, and that biomass is not a solution on pages 83 -87. But his "solutions" are ridiculous - he proposes nuclear on page 87 and hydrogen on page 89.
He rejects the collapse writings of Erlich, Diamond, Reese, Kuntsler, and Lovelock without offering any scientific citations throughout the book to convince me that these writers are wrong. The same for Ivanhoe, Cam[pbell, Laherrere and Deffeyes who he says have "disseminated an alarmist notion of imminent global oil exhaustion followed by economic implosion, massive unemployment, breadlines, homelessness, and the catastrophic end of industrial civilization". He adopts Wall Street Journal / economist fantasy arguments to refute them, saying "they disregard the role of prices, historical perspectives, and human inventiveness and adaptability...these predictions are just the latest installments in a long history of failed forecasts..."
As an example of a failed forecast, he lists Deffeyes's 2003 prediction of 2005. Recently, Science published an article "Peak Oil Production May Already Be Here" (25 March 2011 Vol 331), which states that peak oil probably occurred in 2005.
I was greatly looking forward to some science-based refutations because I'm pretty sad about where the world is headed, but this book didn't cheer me up, it made me annoyed with the selective evidence, avoidance of key subjects, and missing references that I would have liked to see refuted in a book with this title. For someone who has read such an astonishing number of articles and books (the references section is 35 pages long), the absence of systems ecologists and other scientists who've written peer-reviewed articles published in Science and Nature makes it clear that Smil must be avoiding reading anything which might contradict what he wants to believe.
Smil totally ignores Peter Ward, who has published books about how all but one of the past mass extinction events can be ascribed to global warming and how our current burning of fossil fuels could bring on a similar event in the future
The best part of his book is the Unfolding Trends chapter starting with the New World Order section. On page 164-166 he explains why "interdependence" is a better word than globalization. I think he's right -- we just saw that the 2011 tsunami and earthquake that hit Japan caused some single-source suppliers of auto parts to fail, which led to a slow-down in auto production. In the future as manufacturers in countries fail for various reasons (economic, resources declining, wars, social unrest, etc) even distant countries will be affected by these failures.
I thought I had a pretty complete list of catastrophes, but I hadn't heard of the once every 100,000 years volcano-triggered landslides that can create waves over 325 feet high that move up to 215 miles per hour. If there were a massive collapse of the western flank of the Cumbre Vieja volcano on La Palma in the Canary Islands, it would devastate the east coast of North America with a series of 33 to 82 foot high waves (worst case).
Important books missing from Smil's reference list:
Collapse of civilizations, systems ecology
------------------------------------------
Walter Youngquist Geodestinies: The Inevitable Control of Earth Resources over Nations & Individuals
Garrett Hardin Living Within Limits: Ecology, Economics, and Population Taboos
David Pimentel Food, Energy, and Society
John Perlin A Forest Journey: The Role of Wood in the Development of Civilization
Clive Ponting A Green History of the World: The Environment and the Collapse of Great Civilizations
The Collapse of Civilization is not what we should be worrying about. We're on the way to driving ourselves and most other species on the planet extinct.
------------------------------------------------------
Johan Rockström Planetary Boundaries. Exploring the Safe Operating Space for Humanity
Peter Ward The Medea Hypothesis: Is Life on Earth Ultimately Self-Destructive?
Peter Ward Under a Green Sky: Global Warming, the Mass Extinctions of the Past, and What They Can Tell Us About Our Future
Peter Ward, et. al. Out of Thin Air: Dinosaurs, Birds, And Earth's Ancient Atmosphere
Michael J. Mills et. al. Massive global ozone loss predicted following regional nuclear conflict
John Atcheson Methane Burps: Ticking Time Bomb Dec 16, 2004 Baltimore Sun
Can we avoid WW III as energy declines and times get harder?
------------------------------------------------------------
Lutz Kleveman The New Great Game: Blood and Oil in Central Asia
Michael Klare Resource Wars: The New Landscape of Global Conflict
Chalmers Johnson The Sorrows Of Empire: Militarism, Secrecy, and the End of the Republic
Robert Baer Sleeping With the Devil: How Washington Sold Our Soul for Saudi Crude
Ahmed Rashid Taliban: Militant Islam, Oil and Fundamentalism in Central Asia
Peter Turchin War and Peace and War. The Life Cycles of Imperial Nations.
David Berreby Us and Them. Understanding Your Tribal Mind.
Howard Bucknell III Energy and the National Defense.
Why there are no replacements for fossil fuels
----------------------------------------------
Martin Hoffert, et al Advanced Technology Paths to Global Climate Stability: Energy for a Greenhouse Planet 1 Nov 2002 Science
Joseph J. Romm Hype About Hydrogen: Fact and Fiction in the Race to Save the Climate
U.Bossel & B.Eliasson Energy and the Hydrogen Economy
Alice Friedemann The Hydrogen Economy: Energy and Economic Black Hole
Howard Hayden The Solar Fraud: Why Solar Energy Won't Run the World
Ted Trainer Renewable Energy Cannot Sustain a Consumer Society
Jacqueline Langwith, ed. 2008. "Opposing Viewpoints: Renewable Energy, vol. 2."
Sheila Newman, ed. 2008. "The Final Energy Crisis". Pluto Press.
Alice Friedemann Peak Soil: Why Cellulosic and other Biofuels are Not Sustainable and a Threat to America's National Security
D. Pimentel, T. Patzek Ethanol Production Using Corn, Switchgrass, and Wood; Biodiesel Production Using Soybean and Sunflower
H Hirsch, O Becker, M Schneider, A Froggatt Nuclear Reactor Hazards: Ongoing Dangers of Operating Nuclear Technology in the 21st Century
Richard Wolfson Nuclear Choices: A Citizen's Guide to Nuclear Technology
Infrastructure: alternative energy sources must maintain the infrastructure we built when oil had an Energy Returned on Energy Invested of 40-100
--------------------------------------------
Charles Hall et al. Hydrocarbons and the Evolution of Human Culture 20 Nov 2003 Nature 426, pp. 318-22
Brian Hayes Infrastructure: A Field Guide to the Industrial Landscape
Kate Ascher The Works: Anatomy of a City
ASCE American Society of Civil Engineers Report Card for America's Infrastructure. Environmental Protection Agency. The Clean Water and Drinking Water Infrastructure Gap Analysis. 2002.
Read more ›