The God Beyond Belief: In Defence of William Rowe's Evidential Argument from Evil (Studies in Philosophy and Religion) [Hardcover]

Nick Trakakis (Author)

Book Description

ISBN-10: 1402051441 | ISBN-13: 978-1402051449 | Publication Date: November 29, 2006 | Edition: 1

This study of Professor William Rowe’s defense of atheism on the basis of evil assesses the literature that has developed in response to Rowe’s work, closely examining two strategies: mystery – the idea that God may have reasons beyond our comprehension for permitting evil; and theodicy - explanations as to why God allows evil to flourish. The book unearths difficulties in both, concluding that the God of theism must be "beyond belief."

Editorial Reviews

From the Back Cover

Why would a loving God who is all-powerful and all-knowing create a world like ours which is marred by all manner of evil, suffering and injustice? This question has come to be known as ‘the problem of evil’ and has troubled both ordinary folk and specialist philosophers and theologians for centuries, with no answer seemingly in sight. However, in a series of publications from the late 1970s onwards, Professor William Rowe – one of the leading philosophers of religion today – has put forward a powerful case in support of the view that the horrors littering our planet constitute strong evidence against the existence of God. In this book, the first extended study of Rowe’s defense of atheism on the basis of evil, Nick Trakakis comprehensively assesses the large body of literature that has developed in response to Rowe’s work, paying particular attention to two strategies employed by critics: firstly, the appeal to mystery – the idea that God may well have reasons for permitting evil that lie beyond our comprehension; and secondly, the appeal to theodicies, where this involves offering explanations as to why God allows evil to abound in his creation (free will theodicies, for example, argue that God could not prevent us from acting wrongly without at the same time curtailing or removing our free will). Trakakis unearths significant difficulties in both strategies, and concludes that – absent any evidence in support of theism – the God of theism must be judged to be "beyond belief".

Product Details

• Hardcover: 293 pages
• Publisher: Springer; 1 edition (November 29, 2006)
• Language: English
• ISBN-10: 1402051441
• ISBN-13: 978-1402051449
• Product Dimensions: 9.5 x 6.4 x 0.9 inches
• Shipping Weight: 1.8 pounds (View shipping rates and policies)
• Average Customer Review: 5.0 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (1 customer review)
• Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #2,544,085 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

More About the Author

Discover books, learn about writers, read author blogs, and more.

Customer Reviews

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

1 of 1 people found the following review helpful:

5.0 out of 5 stars Evidently good, evidently true, February 22, 2010

By 

Hande Z (Singapore) - See all my reviews

Amazon Verified Purchase

This review is from: The God Beyond Belief: In Defence of William Rowe's Evidential Argument from Evil (Studies in Philosophy and Religion) (Paperback)

This is the latest book on the question of evil. It addresses one of the biggest questions that befuddle theists; it is a question that can be raised in several forms. "How can a good God permit evil?" is the simplest way a lay person might see the issue. This book by Trakakis, however, addresses the technical and advanced form which is to ascertain the probability of God's existence from the evidence of evil in the world. Much has already written about this subject with theists and Christian apologists stoutly defending the idea that their God is all-powerful, all- knowing, and all-good ("The Theistic Position"), while atheists question the inherent contradiction in that description. No one can claim to be all powerful and be all good if evil exists. In 1996 Indiana University Press published a book edited by Daniel Howard-Snyder entitled, "The Evidential Argument from Evil". It consisted of 16 articles on the question of evil. That was a well received book although the complaint seemed to be that the contributions were lop-sided in favour of theistic arguments. The answer to the question of evil is not dependent on the number of answers but on the quality of the answers. Howard-Snyder's book raised the level of the debate to a very high level. Perhaps that explains why it has taken so long for another book on this subject to reach the same level.

The God Beyond Belief may be criticised by those who are counting, that it was written entirely against the theistic position. However, the author declared himself as a `theist, although a tentative one". It is a very well argued and plainly written book that answers some of the theistic defences raised in Howard-Snyder's book. Wykstra's "noseeum" argument was one of those defences that Trakakis breached. Although the book has 13 chapters running into 342 pages, it is a captivating work that was well organised as each chapter deals with a specific argument and follows naturally from the preceding chapter. The book is a full defence of William Rowe's thesis that the presence of evil renders the existence of an all-powerful, all-good god highly improbable. Trakakis begins with an introduction that explains his methodology; then he sets out the background of "the problem of evil" in chapter 2, but quickly moves into Rowe's thesis in chapter 3 in which Rowe's argument as refined over the years was explained. He then spends chapters 4, 5, and 6 arguing against the Wykstra "noseeum" theistic defence (which in brief, was based on the argument that just because we do not understand or know God's reason for permitting evil doesn't mean that he (God) doesn't have one).

Trakakis then considered related issues and arguments in the rest of the book, including the problem of God's "divine hiddenness" which he sees as a further indictment against any defence of God's existence. In brief, in the face of evil, God has no reason to hide himself. He must appear and explain or make his ways and reasons known. That leads Trakakis to issues of what a theistic argument must provide in order to succeed in its defence, and he considered the failure of theists to present any such argument. One of the last chapters dealt with the question of free will and its use by Christian apologists like Richard Swinburne. William Rowe had asserted that the idea of free will must be applied to God if he exists, and that an omnipotent, omni benevolent divine being must have allowed evil as an exercise of its own free will.

"The God Beyond Belief" is a scholarly work and it will likely send the theist defenders back to work for a long time on a reply.