God, Chance and Purpose: Can God Have It Both Ways? [Paperback]

David J. Bartholomew (Author)

Book Description

Publication Date: March 3, 2008

Scientific accounts of existence give chance a central role. At the smallest level, quantum theory involves uncertainty and evolution is driven by chance and necessity. These ideas do not fit easily with theology in which chance has been seen as the enemy of purpose. One option is to argue, as proponents of Intelligent Design do, that chance is not real and can be replaced by the work of a Designer. Others adhere to a deterministic theology in which God is in total control. Neither of these views, it is argued, does justice to the complexity of nature or the greatness of God. The thesis of this book is that chance is neither unreal nor non-existent but an integral part of God's creation. This view is expounded, illustrated and defended by drawing on the resources of probability theory and numerous examples from the natural and social worlds.

Editorial Reviews

Review

'... provides theologians with important and necessary raw materials to be carefully used within their own areas of expertise.' European Society for the Study of Science and Theology

'Bartholomew, an Emeritus Professor of Statistics, presents a complex story line with exemplary clarity, arguing both against those who maintain that the likelihood of life, let alone humans, appearing by chance is so miniscule that there must be an intelligent designer, and against those who assume God must have determined every detail of His creation.' Theological Book Review

'... an insightful and helpful aid.' Peter H. Van Ness, Yale University School of Medicine

Book Description

It is commonly thought that chance and purpose are in opposition to one another and that to admit chance into the equation is to banish God. The thesis of this book is that chance is neither unreal nor non-existent but an integral part of God's creation.

See all Editorial Reviews

Product Details

• Paperback: 272 pages
• Publisher: Cambridge University Press; 1 edition (March 3, 2008)
• Language: English
• ISBN-10: 0521707080
• ISBN-13: 978-0521707084
• Product Dimensions: 8.5 x 5.5 x 0.5 inches
• Shipping Weight: 13.4 ounces (View shipping rates and policies)
• Average Customer Review: 3.8 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (4 customer reviews)
• Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #1,606,611 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

More About the Author

Discover books, learn about writers, read author blogs, and more.

Customer Reviews

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

10 of 10 people found the following review helpful:

5.0 out of 5 stars God and chance are compatible, July 11, 2008

By 

Paul R. Bruggink (Clarington, PA USA) - See all my reviews
(REAL NAME)   

Amazon Verified Purchase

This review is from: God, Chance and Purpose: Can God Have It Both Ways? (Paperback)

David Bartholomew is Emeritus Professor of Statistics at the London School of Economics and Political Science. His book offers a perspective on chance and divine action that only a statistician could provide.

The problem that his book addresses is that chance suggests lack of purpose, and theology speaks of purpose. His solution is seeing chance within, not outside, the providence of God. "Chance plays a positive role in the world and . . . does not undermine God's sovereignty."

Bartholomew identifies three models of evolution:
(1) Blind chance: little or no opportunity for God to act at all.
(2) Purely deterministic: "God's determinate actions successfully mimic chance and at the same time achieve other desired outcomes."
(3) Mostly chance with occassional intervention by God: a modest amount of direct action (obscured by chance) with a large dose of genuine randomness. "In this scenario there are many random happenings, and most of the time, the deity in charge has no more to do than to sit back and delight in the variety of creation. For example, he cites Simon Conway Morris' notion of convergence, according to which "evolution is liable to produce similar solutions to similar problems wherever and whenever they occur . . . making the emergence of something like ourselves a near-certainty" ("Life's Solution: Inevitable Humans in a Lonely Universe" (Cambridge University Press, 2003)).

Regarding the popular notion of God acting undetectably at the quantum level (as suggested by Robert Russell, John Polkinghorne, Nancey Murphy, and others), he concludes that "it is very doubtful whether there are any quantum events which God could influence whose outcomes might significantly determine what happens at the macro level."

In his chapter on Intelligent Design, he concludes that it is a tautology and is not, therefore, a valid scientifice method.

Although the book is non-technical, a background in statistics would certainly help in fully grasping the author's points. I recommend this book for Christians (particularly those with any training in statistics) who want a better understanding of the nature of God's providence, i.e., how God acts in the world.

7 of 7 people found the following review helpful:

4.0 out of 5 stars Serious attempt at reconciling chance and Christian theology, July 17, 2008

By 

David J. Aldous "gentleman scholar" (Alameda, CA USA) - See all my reviews
(REAL NAME)   

Amazon Verified Purchase

This review is from: God, Chance and Purpose: Can God Have It Both Ways? (Paperback)

Even though I'm not a fan of theology, I can recommend this carefully written and serious book to anyone who is interested in the theological implications of chance as seen by a professional statistician. His thesis is "chance is to be seen as within the providence of God rather than outside it" and I'm not competent to comment on the theological arguments. But less than half the book explicitly involves God; much of the book is a descriptive account of where and how scientists see chance involved in the natural and human world. For instance, the chapters on "Chaos out of order" and "Order out of chaos" are nice reminders of the importance of the levels and scales on which we view the world; what looks random on one level may look ordered on another. And the brief and straightforward accounts of many topics (small world networks, random epidemics, game theory, genetic algorithms and a dozen more) are clear and non-technical. So this book is as good or better at surveying the domain of chance as many popular science books written expressly for that purpose; though to my taste, like most other books it is too uncritical of the claimed real-world
relevance of such mathematical models.

Also noteworthy is a central chapter giving a cogent technical critique of the attempts by William Debski, a leading advocate of Intelligent Design, to calculate the chance of a particular biological feature (such as the bacterial flagellum) having ``evolved by chance".

1 of 1 people found the following review helpful:

3.0 out of 5 stars Interesting but Flawed, April 17, 2010

By 

E. Konou "Platonic_Megaverse" - See all my reviews
(REAL NAME)   

This review is from: God, Chance and Purpose: Can God Have It Both Ways? (Paperback)

The book explores the role of such ideas as probabilities, chance, randomness, and purpose, to approach the existence of God. Essentially, the thesis is that chance or determinism are not directly linked with the presence of God. The statistical explanations are interesting, but the book is flawed on many levels.

Firstly, nowhere does the writer define what he means with the term "God". Simple as it may sound, it is an essential part of the discourse and to philosophically ignore it places the argumentative foundation in serious danger. Essentially, the writer falls victim of his own criticism of "taking variables for granted" when calculating probabilities. The book casually accepts a monotheistic - perhaps even a specifically Christian - version of "God" with all the associated shortsightedness this produces. Would the argument be different should we consider a different "God"? The answer must be yes.

Secondly, the writer's approach to quantum mechanics is both outdated and flawed. It should come as no surprise that a statistician would opt for the ensemble interpretation of quantum mechanics, arguing that there is no paradox at all (e.g. with kittens in boxes or electrons passing through double slits), because, in his opinion, quantum mechanics do not apply to individual electrons - or kittens - but to vast numbers of them. The fact that he argues that, essentially, quantum mechanics - devised to be used with individual particles - should not apply to individual particles poses no problem or paradox to the him.

All in all, it's an interesting to read book, with short chapters and not bloated with mathematics, but it's philosophically flawed and offers little to the age-old metaphysical questions of Who are we and Is there a God