Customer Reviews

God Games: What Do You Do Forever?

5 star:		(8)
4 star:		(3)
3 star:		(2)
2 star:		(0)
1 star:		(11)

 

 

In a certain way I must agree with some of the critics some readers made. The book is really difficult to read! The sentences are long, dense and full of elaborate words. You start a page and there are very few paragraphs; you nearly loose your strenght for keeping reading. In my opinion Mr Freer is surely not a good writer, but his brain works well and he has ideas, lots of ideas, and there resides the basic interest of the book. Forget about style and keep reading, your mind will keep pace with his, and you will be going from discovery to discovery. Taken as for his base the Zacharia Sitchim books, which I had read all, he expands the subject in an Horizont of several hundreds years from now. It shakes a lot of your convitions, fixing at the same time lots of loose pieces of the puzle one normally has in the mind. It is not easy to trow away 3000 years of mind control, but it opens completly new horizons. One needs courage to write today such a book. and even Z. Sitchin, the original father of such theory stopped at a certain point and didn't had the courage to go further. Freer goes all the way, and opens full the window, so that your mind can have no limits for expansion. It puts the Universe in your hands and makes you a natural solipsit! Sorry for my English, but I had to rate this book 4, even if I would rate his English 1

While it is true that neither Freer or Sitchin write in a style that flows like good fiction, it is also true that the benefit of the knowledge is well worth the work. I never cease to be excited and amazed at the insight of Neil Freer. He has turned on all the lights and pointed out everything formerly hidden from us, and made it make sense. I find that those who cannot accept the facts he presents, do more to validate the reality of his material, then he could ever prove on his own. Whatever his style of writing, I hope he keeps doing it!

A seminary prof was collecting recommendations for a bibliography "we," his students, felt would assist the church going into the 21st century. My suggestion was Neil Freer's BREAKING THE GODSPELL. But, it wasn't included. Many in academia have not developed enough intellectual honesty to recognize that there IS new evidence that humanity is a genetically-engineered species, much less the courage to examine it faithfully. Freer knows his initial foray (in 1987) was marred with "convoluted sentence structure." "Rethinking the planet" isn't your everyday task. In GOD GAMES he writes more clearly, although he deliberately veils the secret of monoatomic gold--which I believe is a better explanation than Sitchin's for why the Anunnaki/Nephilim (spacemen/gods) were interested in mining Earth's ores. Freer divides this comprehensive overview of the Immortality Paradigm into three sections: A brief history of our history, The traumatic transition, and The new human. He says this text is for those who want to know what to do AFTER they are "genetically enlightened." I think it is equally fine reading AS you are mastering contelligence.

Mr. Freer, in this work, deserves five stars simply for his courage in making public the mental leaps all persons who have braved the profound yet shattering implications of Sitchin's theories are forced to face. Most reader's of Sitchin's works continue the evolution his unveiling of our amnesia inspires, by seeking further clues in the past. Not so Mr. Freer; he takes us on a three part journey, past present and future, the whole way imparting responsibility for our own design. Yes it is difficult to struggle through parts; profound insights demand depth of explaination. This book, these leaps, are not for the lazy who prefer sit-com, short attention spam, spoon fed mental pablum; it is written for minds that will and do shape the future - Futants! Self referencing, humanist, no longer puppets of religious indoctrination living out guilt paradigms toward an absent God; Futancy is human at its purest and most unabashed. Mr. Freer points us toward our destiny as gods in our own right. If Mr. Sitchin taught us that our God in all his faces is but rumour of powerful, dominating ET's who abandoned us in the distant past, Mr. Freer provokes us to throw off Their yoke forever and take back our planet, take back our past, but mostly to create a future for ourselves, for our children, where we as a bicameral species learns how to Live Forever.

Here is a book for the intelligent reader who appreciates a different point of view. Well-written, thought provoking, Mr. Freer explores areas that test our memories for bits of information we've heard over the years but could never quite put our finger on. It all comes together here, and suddenly makes sense. This book is not for the close-minded; but for the open-minded person, it's very worthwhile reading.

Freer obviously is a very well educated person, and proves it by using a ton of words that many people would have to look up in the dictionary to understand what he is saying. While I had no problem with that, I found irritating his habit of repeating everything he wrote several times using different verbage, most of which he managed to use in its proper context. In spite of the above, I found much of what was the "meat" of his work to be interesting and thought provoking. It's not Sitchen quality, but taking a look forward in time and connecting that to a Sitchen background was a novel twist. The book could likely have been written in a MUCH shorter format, but, hey, I read it all !!

Mr. Freer took what I consider the most earth-shaking material to be brought out this century and, quite literally, talked it to death without adding anything to the general understanding of the material. There's perhaps much room for writers to use Zecharia Sitchen's material and extrapolate the possibilities but it is obvious that one of those writers will not be Mr. Freer. His verbosity is circular; he talks in circles without saying anything while the poor reader struggles onward, hoping for something that is just not there. Had I purchased his books at a bookstore as opposed to on-line, I can assure you I would have gone and demanded my money be returned. Mr. Freer's claim to fame will be for taking the Extrodinary and turning it into the unintelligible mundane.

This is a profoundly useful and important work, and deserves a 5 star review. Probably the most important book since Heidegger's Being and Time in its impact on THINKING as opposed to rationation. Not enough superlatives to do this work justice, and it's not for the faint-hearted nor intellectually-cowardly or lazy.

God Games carries an excellent message for all mankind. Although the reading is "heavy" it is worth taking the time to complete the book. Several other reviewers have given the 4-5 star rating which I believe it deserves. Take your time and explore the message embedded within the language of the book. The author is very intellient and this comes across in his writing style. The book is best suited to those who are willing to take the time to learn new mind-expanding concepts and ideas contained within the book.

I have read many books on many different subjects. Titles to include, Seth Speaks The Eternal Validity of the Soul, The 12th Planet, Plato The Last Days of Socrates, Mere Christanity, A Brief History of Time etc...And the bottom line to many of these books is: "The experience of man and how he projects himself to the world." Now we come to Freer and his books Breaking the GodSpell & God Games and in a way he tries to convey the same message through his philosophical, spiritual, and scientific beliefs Which is a gigantic undertaking! For that I do respect him because we need more books like that, The problem that I succumb to(maybe since I'm not as intelligent as most)was his sentence structure, his lengthy chains of words that were not reader friendly that really seem to loose their point. When you have to re-read a paragraph over and over its not very enjoyable. His idea was wonderful! I was so excited when I purchased the book! Unfortunately, he's not the one to bring the "Subjects" together. His approach really saddened me.