Qty:1
  • List Price: $16.95
  • Save: $2.70 (16%)
FREE Shipping on orders over $35.
Only 4 left in stock (more on the way).
Ships from and sold by Amazon.com.
Gift-wrap available.
God and General Longstree... has been added to your Cart
FREE Shipping on orders over $35.
Used: Very Good | Details
Sold by Kings Emporium
Condition: Used: Very Good
Comment: Overall Very Good Condition - Minimal Shelf Wear!! - Eligible for Amazon's FREE Shipping programs!!!
Have one to sell? Sell on Amazon
Flip to back Flip to front
Listen Playing... Paused   You're listening to a sample of the Audible audio edition.
Learn more
See this image

God and General Longstreet: The Lost Cause and the Southern Mind Paperback – March 1, 1995


See all 3 formats and editions Hide other formats and editions
Amazon Price New from Used from
Paperback
"Please retry"
$14.25
$3.50 $1.12
$14.25 FREE Shipping on orders over $35. Only 4 left in stock (more on the way). Ships from and sold by Amazon.com. Gift-wrap available.

NO_CONTENT_IN_FEATURE

Best Books of the Month
Best Books of the Month
Want to know our Editors' picks for the best books of the month? Browse Best Books of the Month, featuring our favorite new books in more than a dozen categories.

Product Details

  • Paperback: 158 pages
  • Publisher: Louisiana State Univ Pr (March 1995)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 0807120146
  • ISBN-13: 978-0807120149
  • Product Dimensions: 8.7 x 5.5 x 0.4 inches
  • Shipping Weight: 7.4 ounces (View shipping rates and policies)
  • Average Customer Review: 3.8 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (8 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #1,770,422 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

More About the Author

Discover books, learn about writers, read author blogs, and more.

Customer Reviews

3.8 out of 5 stars
Share your thoughts with other customers

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

12 of 14 people found the following review helpful By Daniel Hurley VINE VOICE on August 22, 2003
Format: Hardcover
If you want to know how the Lost Cause syndrome got its start and how Longstreet to his shock became the designated failure of the Confederacy, this is a revealing book. Old Pete survived his crippling wounds incurred by bullets during his great counter attack in the Wilderness but the ink from "Old Jube's" (Jubal Early's) pen created greater harm and anguish to Longstreet as Early effectively destroys his reputation. Early holds a tight grasp of southern history and the Southern Historical Society making sure that no one dared write anything about the War of the Rebellion without his approval. How ironic that the man that moved Alexander's auxiliary guns away during Pickett's charge, the former and inefficient Pendleton, makes up a bogus story about Longstreet disobeying a sunrise attack order on the second day of Gettysburg in a speech shortly after Lee died and blames Longstreet solely for the lost battle and in turn the "cause". Early picks up the ridiculous story to exaggerate Pendleton's story to gross proportions while coloring his own role that is very suspect in not supporting an attack on Culp's Hill on the first day of Gettysburg and he also pushed Ewell in not moving his corps to the right as Lee wished failing to contract Lee's over extended lines. Old Jube was a tough fighter but had a hard time with cavalry particularly in the Valley where Lee finally has Early relieved. Unlike Longstreet and Lee, Early left the country after the war and upon his return made a career out of rewriting history to suit his slant. Jubal Early could have been the Roy Cohn of the post Civil War era.Read more ›
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
6 of 7 people found the following review helpful By J. F. Rodriguez on September 23, 2011
Format: Paperback Verified Purchase
I consider myself an avid Civil War history reader and James Longstreet admirer. I was anticipating reading more on how General Longstreet's reputation became tarnished and 'trashed' by Jubal Early and his compatriots in an effort to place blame on Dutch Longstreet for the loss at Gettysburg, and elevating Lee to 'Saint" status after the war. In my opinion, Gen. Longstreet was Lee's most capable and dependable Corps commander - Lee's "Old War Horse."

This book is about the 'Lost Cause' myth and how it came about, and only mentions James Longstreet in a 'few' lines. The book is very interesting and factual, but I believe the title is misleading.

Buy it to read about the Lost Cause origins, but not to read about James Longstreet.

PS: If you are in North Georgia, a visit to his grave site in Alta Vista Cemetery,Gainesville, GA, is well worth it. Don't forget to leave a cigar for Ole Dutch!
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
5 of 6 people found the following review helpful By CRT on March 17, 2009
Format: Paperback
A most enjoyable short book in which the authors, in a set of well-orchestrated essays, ponder on the development and meaning of the idea of the "Lost Cause". Soon after Appomattox, the phrase became a by-word for the perpetuation of the Confederate ideal, which itself was based on an (imperfect) analogy with the lost cause that was medieval Scotland's struggle for independence as related in Sir Walter Scott's novels. (Earnest southern writers attempted to prove that Robert E. Lee was a descendent of Robert the Bruce).

From 1865 through the present days, the Lost Cause has had a variety of meanings. Those men who were involved in Confederate military and political circles attempted to justify secession, and to find reasons for the ultimate military catastrophe. Jefferson Davis and Alexander Stephens, among others, wrote lengthy and turgid volumes essentially stating that the South went to war to protect its "rights". The fact that underlying these rights was the demand of the slave states to extend their "peculiar institution" i.e., slavery, into new territories, if not into free states, was of course, downplayed. Slavery, they said, had nothing to do with the matter. The military men, when not whining about the North's numerical and material advantages, looked for scapegoats within their own ranks.

The most maligned of these was James Longstreet, who was Lee's "right arm" and "old war horse". Had it not been for his "disobedience to Lee's orders" at Gettysburg--to attack at sunrise on the 2nd of July, the battle would have been won and the Confederate cause gained. William Nelson Pendleton, the ineffective and inefficient overseer of the artillery of the Army of Northern Virginia, was the source of this accusation.
Read more ›
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
2 of 2 people found the following review helpful By Thomas W. Robinson on March 20, 2009
Format: Paperback
I've long been a student of the Civil War Era and the Lost Cause is one of the facets of the Civil War that I have long been interested in. This is a short book by Connelly (one of my favorite CW historians, by the way) and Bellows, but it is still one of the better ones on the Lost Cause. This work is more about the Southern mind and how Southern writers built up the Lost Cause and how it has evolved up until this book was originally published in the early 1980s. It also gives an excellent look at how Robert E. Lee became the symbol of the South, which Connelly wrote an entire book about as well. What emerges is the Lost Cause evolved from petty in-fighting about who was to blame for Confederate defeat (hence the Longstreet part of the title) to the creation of an image of the South that was both romantic and tragic. Connelly and Bellows argue that by World War I, the entire nation embraced this image and the dual image of the South has remained. This is a very interesting book and one that should be read by all students of the South, not just people interested in the Civil War. I give it 4 stars instead of 5, however, because there are not endnotes or footnotes so we have no idea where the authors are getting their source material, a big no-no for two academic historians. Besides that, though, no real complaints about this work.
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again

What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?