|Amazon Price||New from||Used from|
Indeed, at times he seems to shoot himself in the foot, as many of his quotations appear to be far more convincing than his refutations of them.
To his credit, Haught admits that it is possible to be moral even without belief in gods but in doing so he destroys the last justification for that belief.
Instead, I was deeply disappointed by the lack of substance in Haught's short book, which utterly fails to respond to Harris, Hitchens and Dawkins.
Traps Dawkins in his own words an systems ...great resource to understand the debate and source for arguments for studyPublished 15 months ago by MARCO QUARTEROLI
This book is pure propaganda. He attacks persons without providing evidence and never addresses anything other than "straw men. Read morePublished 16 months ago by Larry K. Mason
A friend recommended Haught's work to me on this subject. Most books written contra the New Atheists are written by apologists (eg. Trent Horn's Answering Atheists). Read morePublished 17 months ago by David Schutz
Having read the "new atheist trilogy" by Harris, Hitchens and Dawkins, I felt compelled to read this "critical response" by Haught. Read morePublished 21 months ago by deer_hunter
The author lays out very clearly the case against God by the "new" aethiests, or scientific materialists and shows its fatal flaws. Read morePublished 23 months ago by Timothy J. Gannon
what can anyone say it is a BOOK you have no right to demand how many words to write. because
of that demand i usually wont write anything why do you need so many... Read more
The book is very readable and the author is clearly well read. While the author does a reasonably fair job in laying out the central arguments of the new atheists, he neither... Read morePublished on February 19, 2012 by american bandersnatch