or
Sign in to turn on 1-Click ordering.
 
 
Express Checkout with PayPhrase
What's this? | Create PayPhrase
More Buying Choices
56 used & new from $4.57

Have one to sell? Sell yours here
 
   
God and the New Atheism: A Critical Response to Dawkins, Harris, and Hitchens
 
 

God and the New Atheism: A Critical Response to Dawkins, Harris, and Hitchens (Paperback)

~ (Author)
Key Phrases: new atheists, new atheism, explanatory monism, Sam Harris, The God Delusion, Charles Darwin (more...)
3.4 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (21 customer reviews)

List Price: $16.95
Price: $11.53 & eligible for FREE Super Saver Shipping on orders over $25. Details
You Save: $5.42 (32%)
o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o
In Stock.
Ships from and sold by Amazon.com. Gift-wrap available.

Want it delivered Tuesday, November 17? Choose One-Day Shipping at checkout. Details
31 new from $9.98 25 used from $4.57

Formats

Amazon Price New from Used from
  Kindle Edition, December 31, 2007 $9.99 -- --
  Paperback, December 30, 2007 $11.53 $9.98 $4.57

Frequently Bought Together

God and the New Atheism: A Critical Response to Dawkins, Harris, and Hitchens + God Is Not Great: How Religion Poisons Everything + The God Delusion
Price For All Three: $32.09

Show availability and shipping details

  • This item: God and the New Atheism: A Critical Response to Dawkins, Harris, and Hitchens by John F. Haught

    In Stock.
    Ships from and sold by Amazon.com.
    Eligible for FREE Super Saver Shipping on orders over $25. Details

  • God Is Not Great: How Religion Poisons Everything by Christopher Hitchens

    In Stock.
    Ships from and sold by Amazon.com.
    Eligible for FREE Super Saver Shipping on orders over $25. Details

  • The God Delusion by Richard Dawkins

    In Stock.
    Ships from and sold by Amazon.com.
    Eligible for FREE Super Saver Shipping on orders over $25. Details


Customers Who Bought This Item Also Bought

God After Darwin: A Theology of Evolution

God After Darwin: A Theology of Evolution

by John F. Haught
3.6 out of 5 stars (21)  $26.35
Christianity and Science: Toward a Theology of Nature (Theology in Global Perspective Series)

Christianity and Science: Toward a Theology of Nature (Theology in Global Perspective Series)

by John F. Haught
5.0 out of 5 stars (2)  $16.50
What Is God?: How to Think about the Divine

What Is God?: How to Think about the Divine

by John F. Haught
3.6 out of 5 stars (5)  $10.17
Is Nature Enough?: Meaning and Truth in the Age of Science

Is Nature Enough?: Meaning and Truth in the Age of Science

by John F. Haught
2.5 out of 5 stars (2)  $23.99
Responses to 101 Questions on God and Evolution

Responses to 101 Questions on God and Evolution

by John F. Haught
3.7 out of 5 stars (3)  $9.20
Explore similar items

Editorial Reviews

From Publishers Weekly

The recent spate of books from atheists such as Richard Dawkins, Sam Harris and (most stridently) Christopher Hitchens has prompted many pundits and scholars to label the trend the New Atheism. Haught uses the term, but argues that there is nothing really new about the New Atheism; it is instead a rehashing of antireligious arguments that are as old as the Enlightenment. In fact, Haught criticizes the New Atheism as being theologically unchallenging, its all-or-nothing thinking representing about the same level of reflection on faith that one can find in contemporary creationist and fundamentalist literature. Haught draws upon theologians such as Tillich, Bultmann, Ricoeur, McFague and Pannenberg to refute some of the New Atheists' most common contentions. Through most of Haught's book, his approach is straight theism, with the exclusively or specifically Christian arguments coming near the end. Although this book is more accessible than some of Haught's earlier theological work (e.g., Is Nature Enough?), it is still challenging and serious; readers will need to follow scientific, theological, philosophical and logical threads to keep up. The reward is worth it, however, as Haught lays out the fundamental issues clearly and without the vitriol that has characterized Hitchens et al. as well as many of their interlocutors. (Feb.)
Copyright © Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.


Product Description

In God and the New Atheism a world expert on science and theology gives clear, concise, and compelling answers to the charges against religion laid out in recent bestselling books by Richard Dawkins (The God Delusion), Sam Harris (The End of Faith), and Christopher Hitchens (God Is not Great). For some, these new atheists appear to say extremely well what they believe to be wrong with religion. But, as John Haught shows, the treatment of religion in these books is riddled with logical inconsistencies, shallow misconceptions, and crude generalizations. Can God really be dismissed as a mere delusion? Is faith really the enemy of reason? And does religion really poison everything? God and the New Atheism offers a much-needed antidote to the extremist claims of scientific fundamentalism. This provocative and accessible little book will enable readers to see through the rhetorical fog of this recent phenomenon and come to a clearer understanding of the issues at stake in this crucial debate.

Product Details

  • Paperback: 156 pages
  • Publisher: Westminster John Knox Press (December 31, 2007)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 066423304X
  • ISBN-13: 978-0664233044
  • Product Dimensions: 8.3 x 5.5 x 0.4 inches
  • Shipping Weight: 7.2 ounces (View shipping rates and policies)
  • Average Customer Review: 3.4 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (21 customer reviews)
  • Amazon.com Sales Rank: #101,578 in Books (See Bestsellers in Books)

    Popular in this category: (What's this?)

    #59 in  Books > Religion & Spirituality > Spirituality > Atheism

More About the Author

John F. Haught
Discover books, learn about writers, read author blogs, and more.

Visit Amazon's John F. Haught Page

Inside This Book (learn more)

What Do Customers Ultimately Buy After Viewing This Item?

God and the New Atheism: A Critical Response to Dawkins, Harris, and Hitchens
72% buy the item featured on this page:
God and the New Atheism: A Critical Response to Dawkins, Harris, and Hitchens 3.4 out of 5 stars (21)
$11.53
God Is Not Great: How Religion Poisons Everything
13% buy
God Is Not Great: How Religion Poisons Everything 3.7 out of 5 stars (893)
$10.19
The God Delusion
6% buy
The God Delusion 3.8 out of 5 stars (1,481)
$10.37
The Greatest Show on Earth: The Evidence for Evolution
5% buy
The Greatest Show on Earth: The Evidence for Evolution 4.4 out of 5 stars (113)
$16.20

Tags Customers Associate with This Product

 (What's this?)
Click on a tag to find related items, discussions, and people.
 
(7)

Your tags: Add your first tag
 

 

Customer Reviews

21 Reviews
5 star:
 (6)
4 star:
 (6)
3 star:
 (3)
2 star:
 (2)
1 star:
 (4)
 
 
 
 
 
Average Customer Review
3.4 out of 5 stars (21 customer reviews)
 
 
 
 
Share your thoughts with other customers:
Most Helpful Customer Reviews

 
98 of 141 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars Some people just don't get it..., April 27, 2008
Many of the negative reviewers of this book so clearly have their OWN agendas in mind that they simply miss the THREE POINTS Haught was trying to make in this concise little critical tome: 1) that the "New Atheists" aren't really so "new"; 2) that the "old" atheists were more insightful and much more consistent (in other words, the NA's are not very "good" atheists); and 3) That the New Atheists rely on "straw God" arguments and certain presuppositions about both the nature of religion and the nature of reality that are not THEMSELVES "scientific," and thus, are more akin to "religious faith' than they are to genuine scientific inquiry.

To those ends, Haught makes his case eloquently and definitively. The negative reviewers need to realize that this book does NOT attempt or CLAIM to be exhaustive (it's only 107 pages, people!), nor does it attempt to "answer" the new atheists with (what for Haught would be) a more "adequate" worldview (for that, you actually have to READ his systematic works on Evolutionary Theology: "God After Darwin," "Deeper Than Darwin," and "Christianity and Science: Toward a Theology of Nature." Only after reading these cogently argued works is one in a proper position to "critique" Haught.

The "personal" nature of some of the negative reviews is quite astonishing, and reveals more about the reviewers' LACK of familiarity with Haught's reputation and his rather extensive body of work than they do about Haught himself.

For example, reviewer Ross' suggestion that Haught doesn't really "understand" the New Atheists, or the Old ones (like Nietzsche) is laughable when you consider that (in the case of Dawkins) Haught is WIDELY considered to be one of the FOREMOST experts in the science and religion dialogue (equally notable Darwinian Philosopher Michael Ruse calls him, "Our most distinguished writer today on the science and religion relationship"), and (in the case of Nietzsche) has written EXTENSIVELY on the impact of existentialism on religious thought (see Haught's "What is Religion?" for starters). Also, he's been teaching this stuff for 20+ years, and I think some smart-aleck graduate student would have "corrected" his "misinterpretation" of Nietzsche long ago, don't you?

Ross also apparently doesn't understand the difference between the way science SHOULD be practiced, and the way that it's ACTUALLY practiced. His idealistic view of "Big science" is quaint and kinda charming. Aside from Kuhn's famous analysis,"Structures," Mary Midgley's classic, "Evolution as a Religion," and Richard C. Lewontin's "Biology as Ideology," two recent books by other "real" scientists, Lee Smolin's "The Trouble with Physics," and Robert Laughlin's "A Different Universe" clearly reveal just how political, cliquish, and NON-OBJECTIVE the "business of science" can really be. When Haught says that scientists have "faith" in the "intelligibility of the universe," and that that NAs like Daniel Dennett has "faith" in the truth of the Dogma of "scientific naturalism" (the view that 1) only nature is real, 2)that God does not exist, and 3)that science alone can give us complete and reliable knowledge of reality), he most certainly knows of what he speaks. The "presumption" of scientific naturalism is just that - a presumption. It's a statement of belief, NOT a demonstrated, OBJECTIVE, scientific "fact."

Ross goes on to suggest that Haught might be WRONG when he argues that Richard Dawkins is unfamiliar with the work of thoughtful, systematic theologians like Paul Tillich and Sallie McFague. REALLY??? You want to tell me with a straight face that anyone familiar with the "theology lite" of "The God Delusion" really believes that Mr. "Devil's Chaplin" has seriously worked his way through ALL-THREE volumes of Tillich's uber-dense "Systematic Theology" (about which dozens and dozens of scholarly books have been written), and McFague's eco-feminist explorations of "Metaphorical Theology," and "The World as God's Body," especially since he believes that "Theology is a vacuous, nonsensical enterprise," since "its subject matter is non-existent"? Why would he put himself through that "torture?" Unlike Ross in Haught's case, I HAVE read ALL of Dawkins' books, and I can tell you there is NO indication that he is even FAMILIAR with likes of a Tillich, McFague, Clayton, Griffin, Peacocke, Polkinghorne, Barbour, Hefner, Peters, Cobb, Murphy, Keller, Kaufman, Wilber, or a Haught, much less that he (or Ross) has actually STUDIED any of their work. GIVE ME A BREAK!!!

Another reviewer claims that Haught "despises naturalism", is a "bad" scholar, doesn't understand Intelligent design theory, is a "poor" philosopher of religion and that he (for example) "doesn't understand the 'difference' between 'faith' and 'religion,' and between 'morals' and 'ethics.'

Again, Is the reviewers' "knowledge" of Haught's "poor" academic skills the result of his/her having studied all FOURTEEN or so of Haught's books and dozens of academic papers? How many Peer-reviewed journal articles has THE REVIEWER written, I wonder? In what circles is he/she acclaimed?

For one thing, since Haught is an "Evolutionary theologian" who believes that the divine works in and through the world's NATURAL, CAUSAL PROCESSES (primarily at the level of "novel information patterns"), to say that he "despises" naturalism is BEYOND a colossal MISUNDERSTANDING of his work. As suggested by the title of Haught's companion book to this one, "Is Nature Enough?" his problem with "scientific naturalism" is that it is for him an INADEQUATE way of explaining the full DEPTH of reality. He's no "supernaturalist," and he has no problem with evolutionary-theory-as-such; just the NAs VERSION of it!

For another thing, as one intimately involved in the academic study of religion, I can tell you that "faith" is OFTEN used as a SYNONYM for "religion," as in, "The Catholic Faith," or "The Jewish Faith." This is a DIFFERENT but quite COMMON use of the word than, say, "faith" as "trust in the truth of something despite not yet having any proof of it." Haught's not "confused"; apparently the REVIEWER is.

Similarly, many well-known moral theorists, such as Peter Singer, make no REAL distinctions between the words "Morals" and "Ethics," in practical usage, although, yes, some theorists do. Does this mean that Singer "doesn't know what he's talking about," either?"

When I was in my first year of seminary, one of my professors used to always tell us that one could only critique a theologian or philosopher when one was familiar enough with their BODY of work to make an INFORMED criticism. Otherwise, we were just embarrassing ourselves. Too bad many of the negative reviewers didn't heed that advice!

If you are truly interested in discovering the utter lack of depth and insight in the writings of the "New Atheists," then I highly recommend reading Haught's little surgical blade of a book (along with Alister McGrath's "Dawkins God," and Keith Ward's, "Pascal's Fire: Scientific Faith and Religious Understanding"). If you love the NAs, and want to continue believing that "all" religious folks (and all the great western philosophers, like Kant, Hegel, Schelling, Newton, Descartes, and Whitehead) are uneducated, anti-scientific, superstitious simpletons, then, hey, don't let ME rain on your parade!
Comment Comments (15) | Permalink | Was this review helpful to you? Yes No (Report this)



 
91 of 134 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars Old Straw Man's Hat, June 9, 2008
By Anthony Konrath "Tony Konrath" (Key West, Florida United States) - See all my reviews
(REAL NAME)   
Simply re-labeling standard atheism and calling it "New Atheism" and then attacking it for being old-fashioned doesn't make for a good book. This is not a good book - just an old fashioned re-hash of arguments that simply don't work.

It's a prime example of straw man bashing and this writer has and should produce better work.
Comment Comments (2) | Permalink | Was this review helpful to you? Yes No (Report this)



 
158 of 234 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars Nice try, March 21, 2008
By Franklin D. Ross (Anaheim, CA USA) - See all my reviews
(REAL NAME)   
In his new book God and the New Atheism John Haught does not directly refute any of the claims of what he is pleased to call "the new atheists" ie Dawkins, Harris and Hitchens. Instead he brings up several old, tired truth claims for religion. To wit;

1. "Science requires as much `faith' as religion does." Haught obviously doesn't understand science when he says something like that. There is zero `faith' in science. Every thing in science is held tentatively, even the scientific method. If a demonstrably better system comes along, scientists will adopt it long before theologians do. Until that happens the scientific method is the best way that we have of assessing the truth of claims. No scientist has `faith' in science. On the contrary, skepticism is the engine that drives science. There is only one assumption underlying science and that that the universe is `knowable' and even this basic assumption is constantly being tested. So far that assumption is holding up but if it can be shown to be false then theologians are in more trouble than scientists are.
2. "The new atheists are intolerant and want to destroy religion." When you turn on a light do you destroy darkness? When you teach a person to read do you destroy illiteracy? When you point out that superstition doesn't work are you destroying `faith'? I suppose that in a sense, Haught is right. The new atheists do seem to be intolerant of darkness, illiteracy and superstition.
3. "The new atheists have not studied the classical religious apologists such as Tillich, Bultmann, Ricoeur, McFague and Pannenberg." This may or may not be true. I suspect that it is not true but the new atheists don't spend much time on these scholars. Tillich, Bultmann, et al start with the assumption that gods exist and then go on from there to fill volume after volume with descriptions of the properties of these hypothesized gods. P. Z. Meyers answered this claim very well with the courtier's response which says (if I may be allowed to paraphrase) it is not necessary to spend years studying the finer nuances of high fashion in order to see that the emperor has no clothes.
4. "Atheism leads inexorably to nihilism". Haught's understanding of Nietzsche is as poor as his understanding of science. Nietzsche was horrified by the void that would be created upon the death of God. However Nietzsche worked through this frightening realization and came up with the saying "say yes to life". Subsequent existentialist thinkers expanded upon this theme to show that giving up superstition is actually quite liberating once you give it a try.

To his credit, Haught admits that it is possible to be moral even without belief in gods but in doing so he destroys the last justification for that belief. So the book is not totally without merit. If I were Dawkins et al I would insist that Haught's book be bundled with mine as a concrete example of just how weak and tired the best of the apologists are.

Comment Comments (13) | Permalink | Was this review helpful to you? Yes No (Report this)


Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
 
 
 
Most Recent Customer Reviews

5.0 out of 5 stars Excellent tool for the confused.
This book will assist the confused believer and the soft-core atheist in re-framing the questions on belief in God. Read more
Published 14 days ago by Andrew M. Mcalpin

1.0 out of 5 stars Infuriating, stultifying, repetitive
I came to this book with high hopes. I had read Dawkins and Harris some years ago and, despite my desire otherwise, was actually impressed with and swayed by their arguments... Read more
Published 2 months ago by Michael Willers

4.0 out of 5 stars The not so new atheism
For those interested in the relationship between science and religion, John Haught is no stranger. He is one of the leading thinkers in the field and is known for his thorough... Read more
Published 3 months ago by matt

2.0 out of 5 stars A Catholic theologian's CONFUSED "critical response" to the New Atheism
XXXXX

"All three of our soft-core atheists [see below] are absolutely certain that the creeds, ideals, and practises of religion are essentially evil. Read more
Published 6 months ago by Stephen Pletko

4.0 out of 5 stars A Thoughtful Commentary
This book is a scholarly yet readable rebuttal to several recently-published mainstream books by prominent Darwinian scholars, and is written to the intelligent layperson. Read more
Published 7 months ago by Amy Deardon

5.0 out of 5 stars On the Nose
It is clear that, like Dawkins and the other self-proclaimed "new atheists" who are the target of Haught's book, most of the the critics of this book here on Amazon know little or... Read more
Published 9 months ago by Sick of Spin

4.0 out of 5 stars Ollie's Take
The Author makes a reasoned argument which I dispute.
The product, itself, was just as described by the seller.
Published 11 months ago by Elliott M. Feigenbaum

3.0 out of 5 stars Disappointing
When Haught criticizes new atheists for arguing that faith is not supported by credible evidence, that implies that Haught has evidence that DOES support faith. Read more
Published 11 months ago by Panda Bear

4.0 out of 5 stars Thoughtful analysis...
One legacy of 9/11 is a spate of books decrying religious extremism and heralding science and reason over faith. Read more
Published 13 months ago by M. Nichols

5.0 out of 5 stars Merits Consideration as the Liberal Response to the New Atheists
In the Introduction Haught argues that a proper understanding of God, faith, and theology is something these critics are woefully lacking in, and as such their critique of... Read more
Published 13 months ago by John W. Loftus

Only search this product's reviews



Customer Discussions

This product's forum
Discussion Replies Latest Post
No discussions yet

Ask questions, Share opinions, Gain insight
Start a new discussion
Topic:
First post:
Prompts for sign-in
 


Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
Search all Amazon discussions
   




Product Information from the Amapedia Community

Beta (What's this?)


Look for Similar Items by Category


Look for Similar Items by Subject

 

Feedback

If you need help or have a question for Customer Service, contact us.
 Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
Is there any other feedback you would like to provide?

Your comments can help make our site better for everyone.


Your Recent History

 (What's this?)

After viewing product detail pages or search results, look here to find an easy way to navigate back to pages you are interested in.