Your Garage botysf16 Amazon Fashion Learn more nav_sap_plcc_ascpsc PME Fire TV Stick Sun Care Patriotic Picks Shop-by-Room Amazon Cash Back Offer AllOrNothingS1 AllOrNothingS1 AllOrNothingS1  Amazon Echo  Echo Dot  Amazon Tap  Echo Dot  Amazon Tap  Amazon Echo Introducing new colors All-New Kindle Oasis AutoRip in CDs & Vinyl Segway miniPro STEM

Your rating(Clear)Rate this item

There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.

Professor Coogan teaches Scripture: "I am sometimes asked by relatives and students to suggest biblical passages for use at their weddings, but few are appropriate." If God wrote Holy Writ, he did so as a "forgetful" writer--and a "terrible" one. Not only is the Good Book full of inconsistencies, but its protagonist holds not only a powerful grudge against the men and women made in his own image. Coogan's quick, clear, and no-nonsense pages explain "what the Bible really says." No wonder that brides and grooms can find little in either Hebrew writings or Christian testament to celebrate married, monogamous, and licitly carnal love.

Sinless romance occurs rarely; for ancient societies obsessed with patriarchy and paternity, women count as chattel. Bought and sold by their fathers, tossed away by their betrothed, denigrated by their Creator, women's rank can be summed up in the Tenth Commandment. As Coogan reminds us, coveting our neighbor's wife ranks second, after envying our neighbor's house. Real estate took precedence, and women--while ranked ahead of the male and female servants, and the oxen next door--nevertheless mattered far more as breeders than as beloved.

Coogan's chapters, arranged with more care than much of Scripture, show few inconsistencies. He begins by analyzing "to know in the biblical sense." This phrase conveys the truth that the ancients knew: sexual intimacy conveys a deeper understanding of our partner. He shows where indirect terms for sexual intercourse lurk. When I studied the Book of Ruth in my Catholic high school, I was puzzled why widowed Ruth "uncovered the feet" of her wealthy relative, Boaz, to "lay at his "feet until dawn." This did not sound very romantic.

Coogan explains that the term for "feet" often disguised "genitals." Likewise, Delilah caused Samson to "sleep at her knees," so this implies that she post-coitally cut off his hair to unman his vigor. That passage now makes sense. The woman (not Mary Magdalene although often assumed to be her) who knelt at the feet of her master, Jesus, to bathe and kiss his feet, may cloak innuendo. A "hand" in Hebrew terminology may mean an erection. Even an artificial phallus-via a clever Hebrew pun on this implement as "re-member-ance"--enters the metaphorical arsenal with which wanton Israel's personified as an impious, pagan slattern. Reticence began to take over for biblical writers no less than most moderns. Persistent textual ambiguity cautions us not to transfer our contemporary interpretations back to every venerable passage in Scripture.

On this basis, Coogan takes us through subjects that limit the status of women. Widows, virgins, celibates, the Virgin Mary, and the public and domestic roles of women define her subordination. Coogan minimizes feminist attempts to find a wealth of positive portrayals. The extended celebration in the Book of Proverbs of the ideal woman turns out to be a model demonstration, as in a home economics text for teen girls once upon a desert time, of how a housewife should act. The Bible changes little from Jewish to early Christian eras in depicting women.: They remain under men's dominance. A static rather than dynamic condition continues, while males find obedience exacted from a God who enforces his side of every bargain or contract. Such legal distinctions permeate this ancient world: sex is one more realm to police and enforce.

Abortion, arranged marriages, endogamy and exogamy, polygamy, and divorce next gain attention. In the Gospels, the situation of divorce narrows; Jesus challenges rabbinic authority by being more conservative than his forebears in regard to divorce. That Jesus never married, an unusual status for an adult Jewish male, makes for its own ambiguity. Coogan brushes aside speculation as to the sexuality of Jesus, mistrusting whatever imaginative scenarios for same-sex or Magdalene-compatible love that later storytellers contrive.

Adultery, sex within family boundaries, prohibited relationships, and rape and prostitution earn study. The utter brutality of the murder of Dinah and the tossing aside of Tamar, both entangled within conniving and cruel scenarios that recall gang-rape and "honor" killings, one-night stands and sleazy cover-ups remind us of the less-edifying chapters of the Bible. Yet, less commonly preached examples of role models: seductive murderesses as freedom fighters Jael and Judith; Jephthah's doomed virgin daughter; or two ancestors of David and Jesus, the Jericho prostitute Rahab and the one-time prostitute Tamar, endure.

However, again contrary to recent attempts by liberal scholars wishing to find a freer non-normative sexuality within the margins of Scripture, Coogan holds that "temple" or "cult" prostitution did not likely exist. The Hebrews attributed to their enemies whatever aberrations in diet or ritual or sex that the Chosen People feared. Within the cultures around Palestine, Coogan cannot find evidence for ritual prostitution in the worship of a god or goddess.

The book finds its strongest footing when exploring same-sex relationships. Coogan emphasizes how "male homoerotic relationships" as we know them lacked the same equivalents that gay activists strive to place them in, alongside heterosexual ones, today. The modern notion of "homosexuality" lacking, Coogan cannot substantiate earnest defenses of Jonathan and David's love "more wonderful than the love of women" as the predecessor in sanctioned Scripture for Adam and Steve at a courthouse in a few states recent mornings. Coogan sets such "love" as better matched to covenental rhetoric used in treaties, a form of male-bonding in a society that-- as in segregated cultures now-- keeps apart men and women in public, and which puts down women as inferior to men, especially prior to marriage.

Scriptural support for male sexual relationships appears elusive. (Lesbians as free from issues of patriarchy or paternity went unmentioned in the Hebrew Bible.) That is, male-male sexual references existed in the codes of Leviticus as one example of "category confusion." Wearing clothes woven from different types of yarn, plowing with two different species of animals, cross-dressing: these along with a man who was penetrated, and thus "feminized," by another man all occupy the realm of mixed natural categories. For Hebrews obsessed by keeping order, and avoiding contamination, Coogan sets "sex between men" as no more "intrinsically wrong" than "wearing clothing made from wool and linen," if we are to insist (as Christian fundamentalists and "Torah-true" Jews do today) that "divinely given prohibitions are eternally binding." Coogan reminds the reader that we cannot pick and choose which prohibitions from Leviticus to obey and which to discard. However, I wondered about the relevance of Peter's famous vision of what was non-kosher which was given him to lawfully eat under the new dispensation; as with Mary Douglas' theory on purity vs. danger as the solution to the mysteries of categories here, Coogan's lack of crucial contexts appears odd.

His book can shorten what needs expansion as a foundation for his swift arguments. The basis of these chapters as lectures may account for some of this concision. This book moves very rapidly. While summations of bible stories are necessary for non-specialists or the less devout, their length did subtract, given only two hundred pages are devoted to this vast topic, from the usefulness of this text. Coogan does append endnotes referring to monographs, so this compression may have been a compromise to keep this an admirably calm and jargon-free overview.

Although the actual Hebrew and Greek terms are rarely discussed per se by Coogan, he shows how translations mislead us. For instance, the King James version chooses "whores" and "sodomites" where a nuanced version closer to the Hebrew would render "not holy women" and "not holy men." "Kadosh" means holy, but also "set apart." This typical word-play in the original language itself upends the categories that dominate the traditional Jewish worldview of an ordered creation within a covenentally faithful Israel who must keep up its bargains with Yahweh, or else face doom, deportation, and the dispersal of its women to her enemies. The casting of Israel as an unfaithful consort makes for some of the harshest, and most explicit, condemnations within sexual terminology used in the Bible, terms that in many versions find euphemism.

Yahweh himself enters the final chapter "Fire in the Divine Loins: God's Wives in Myth and Metaphor." He earns his own textual disguise. The recent discovery of a site where "I bless you by Yahweh of Samaria and by his Asherah" was scrawled above graffito of a phallic god arm in arm with his goddess, "his divine wife," reminds us of the prehistory of what became--as the Hebrews tried to separate themselves into a category totally apart from their neighbors and foes--a single, angry, paranoid Lord. The "naked wives of Yahweh" stripped and mocked in front of men in the Book of Ezekiel are a late attribution to this early allegory, where the most patriarchal Father of all controlled his women. He punished his wayward daughters. He banished his unfaithful wives. While he may forgive his fallen women and take them back, he never seems to forget.

Concluding, Coogan chides any who rely on the Bible "as an anthology of proof texts to be cherry-picked for scriptural support for preconceived conclusions." He confronts us with "an insanely jealous and abusive husband" as part of God's role. For those who regard the Bible as the ultimate authority, such evidence cannot be dismissed if other passages (such perhaps as those of Leviticus often cited?) are asserted as relevant now as three thousand years ago. "Family values," in the Bible, provide disturbing role models for us.

Coogan encourages an alternate interpretation. As the U.S. Constitution originated with a different understanding of slavery, or the role of women, than what we accept today, so with the Bible. A fundamentalist, literal, "originalist" dogmatism denies Scripture's evolution to catch up to current society. By a communal consensus, our nation developed wider interpretations for the Constitution than those initially codified. Similarly, Coogan urges "liberty and justice for all" within a more forgiving, and more lovingly liberating, version of a flexible, adaptive teaching that can more truly enlighten its believers today.
1616 comments|71 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on January 17, 2011
If you're hoping for a biblical Harlequin, look elsewhere. This is a heavy little book, even a little overwhelming, as it delves into the sexual inequalities of biblical times. I found the book rather dark in places; an obvious agenda of the author is to extol how grateful we should be to have outgrown the biblical view of women as property. Indeed there are multiple horror stories of how women were treated in the Bible, but is it healthy to overdose on this topic? Coogan touches only briefly on the other side of the coin--the radical change in treatment encouraged by Jesus and his earliest followers. Even Paul, says Coogan, suppressed women, as he argues against current scholarship that many of the suppressive teachings recorded by "Paul" were actually later writings.

But, thankfully, the book isn't entirely about sexual inequality. Some of the topics are more light-hearted. You'll learn about sexual innuendos which shed light on several passages in the Bible; you'll find out whether David and Jonathan were gay lovers (they weren't); you'll learn about the sin of Sodom and Gomorrah (it wasn't sodomy, or even sexual perversity); you'll learn about Yahweh's wife in Israel's most primitive beliefs, including several passages from the Bible. I highly recommend the book, and I guarantee you'll learn from it.
22 comments|16 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on August 31, 2011
Written by one of America's foremost Old Testament scholars, this book is packed with information about the Bible's differing views on sex. While this book could easily be read over the weekend due to its size, it would probably be more beneficial to slowly read this micro-tome, which is packed with the cultural aspects of sex and the role of women during biblical times. It also touches on what the says about homosexuality.

Coogan begins and ends the book by stating that the Bible should be read with the understanding that all the books in it reflect the author of that book, rather than simply God. And if you have many different people writing about the same subject (in this case, sex) over a period of centuries, you will obviously have different views and even contradictions. People tend to read the Bible as if God personally penned all 66 books, while ignoring the influence of the author as well as the culture the author lived in. For example, throughout the book we learn that women are treated almost as property throughout most of the Bible with few exceptions, which is a reflection of the patriarchal society that existed in ancient Israel for centuries (for millennia, really), rather than that being the way God designed that society.

The only problems I had with this book is that it got a bit dry towards the middle-end. I guess because the author is a scholar, and while he did write this book for the laity, I got slightly bored with it towards the end, and I had to marshal my concentration skills to finish it. However, it's a short book, and most of it was indeed interesting.

Overall, it was a decent read. Some chapters I found more interesting than others, but it was all useful information.
0Comment|5 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on December 17, 2013
Professor Coogan discusses the role of sex in both Judaism and Christianity in an objective and realistic manner and in no way tries to preach religion or theology. He really picks apart both the Hebrew Bible and the New Testament and explains what these books really say about God and sex and points out the misconceptions that so many so-called religious people have. For example, so many anti-gay Christians say that The Bible describes marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Professor Coogan quotes passage after passage that indicates that in biblical societies one man frequently had more than one wife. King David, for example, had eight. Just as a clarification, when I say that Coogan "picks apart" the Hebrew Bible and New Testament, I am not saying that he is making fun of these books. He simply points out what they really say rather than what uninformed people claim that these books say. I wonder, for example, how many Christians realize that in both the book of Matthew and the book of Luke, Jesus' genealogy is traced through Joseph and not through Mary, thus indicating that Jesus' true father might have been Joseph.
0Comment|3 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on January 13, 2011
God and Sex is a powerful argument against Biblical literalism. The author maintains that many Christian conservatives are misreading Biblical passages to shore up their arguments against actions they disapprove of, such as abortion and same sex marriage. Coogan argues the Bible is a flawed work of human beings, frequently edited over many years. He shows an impressive understanding of actual practices during Biblical times. For example, religious conservatives argue today that same-sex marriage is against "traditional Biblical values, i.e. one man and one woman raising a family." He shows this is false--there are repeated instances of men married to one more than one woman, having concubines give birth, etc.. This is a must read for anyone who thinks they know what the Bible says, and more importantly what it really means.
77 comments|15 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on August 11, 2014
A wonderful, life-affirming little book. I actually read this a few years ago, so I don't remember details, but it made a huge impression on me, showing how the Bible does not say what mainstream culture thinks it does about sex and sexuality. Very liberating.
0Comment|One person found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on May 18, 2013
I'm a huge fan of anything that's "outside the box". Coogan is definitely an outside the box thinker and discusses these difficult topics in a very confident and educated manner and does't seem to care that his thoughts and assertions fly in the face of traditional beliefs. I love that about this book, however, he has some strange reasoning that makes me wonder if he doesn't really have a hidden agenda - some sort of vendetta against traditional Christian beliefs.

For example he states "if God is so concerned about every fetus, then why are there so many miscarriages?". This rhetorical question was related to a discussion on God's providence. This is a classic non sequitur. He then moves to a naturalistic fallacy by trying to make a moral case regarding abortion from his non sequitur. His conclusion simply doesn't follow his premises.

He also confuses Old Testament cultural law and moral law at times. This is too much of a rookie mistake for someone who proclaims to be an expert in theology. This seems to be done in a covert manner hoping that people won't pick up on it - just a gut feeling I got while reading.

Despite these problems, I really do like the way Coogan thinks and I enjoyed the "non-traditional" discussions of this topic. He maintains an open dialogue about things that the church refuses to discuss and doesn't allow the pressures of traditional beliefs regarding such things as gender stereotypes and roles, patriarchalism, translation errors/problems, etc. He pushes against mainstream thought regarding what the Bible says. I enjoyed how he integrates cultural differences in Biblical translations - another issue that the mainstream church refuses to acknowledge.

Overall, if you can look past the strange reasoning problems and possible covert manipulations, this is a great addition to anyone's library.
0Comment|Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on August 25, 2015
VERY informative book and I think Coogan is spot on. Most of the time he is very clear and to the point, but I thought a couple of chapters went on and on when he didn't need to. But it was still great info!! Dr Coogan has done his homework and it shows. He weeds through some of the misconceptions on this subject today and makes them clearer. Buy it! :)
0Comment|Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on May 25, 2012
The book covers "Sex in the Bible" rather than "Sex in Relationships as written in the Bible" which is what I was actually looking for.

It covers all the ways that sex is written about in the Bible from slavery, concubines, fear of foreign women, to ownership of daughters and their sexuality as commodities to trade.

If you have an interest in how the Bible address, almost everything about sex, then this is the book for you.
0Comment|One person found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on February 9, 2011
This is an outstanding book that gives an honest review of the Bible. It feels like the author has a subjective view of the subject matter and is not trying to convince you to believe or not to believe. It is written in an engaging way that is easy to access for all level of readers. He does open up the Bible in a whole new way to people who are not taught those aspects of the Bible at Sunday Church. I highly recommend this book to anyone who believes or does not believe.
0Comment|6 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse