Most Helpful Customer Reviews
18 of 18 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Well-done guide to recent church/state controversies..., June 25, 2007
This review is from: God on Trial: Dispatches from America's Religious Battlefields (Hardcover)
Mr. Irons, while clearly a member of the separationist camp in the matter of religious expressions involving government support, is quite fair to the opposition. They are profiled as often as the plaintiffs in his descriptions of five recent cases, and treated respectfully. If you have ever wondered "How does a high school football pre-game prayer in small-town Texas wind up at the U.S. Supreme Court?" this is the book that tells you. Other cases include postings of the Ten Commandments, erections of Christian crosses on city lands, the words "under God" as part of the Pledge of Allegiance, and the endorsement of "Intelligent Design" in biology classes at the Dover, Pa. high school. I chose this from my public library shelf as a "back-up" book in case the one I really wanted to read turned out to be too dull. Which it did. After I started reading this, I found it to be fascinating. We "separationists" have not been victorious in all of the fights mentioned above, and some of them are still in the process. No matter which side you think you are on, however, this volume will be useful to you.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
16 of 18 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Established Matters of Contention, June 22, 2007
This review is from: God on Trial: Dispatches from America's Religious Battlefields (Hardcover)
This book is about recent cases involving the establishment clause of the First Amendment which is the legal basis requiring separation between church and state. My first serious introduction to establishment clause cases came in 1985 during my second year of law school when I wrote a comment article about Wallace v. Jaffree (the moment of silence case) for the law review competition. The contentious nature of establishment clause cases was made clear when about a dozen classmates told me I would never make law review because of my politically-incorrect position (the law school was on a very liberal campus where the anti-military students went about dressed in surplus combat fatigues--"Che le vie"). This book begins with an excellent overview of the cultural, legal, and political history of the relationship between church and government, and then moves on to chapters that focus on recent establishment clause cases. A major strength of the book is its descriptions of the parties and the processes by which the cases make their way through the judicial system. Most of the chapters end with interview-based biographical content about some of the people involved in the cases, which sheds an interesting light on the backgrounds, beliefs, and motives of the kinds of people who raise and defend against charges that certain practices cause too much entanglement between government and religion. The author should be commended for structuring the book so that it brings forth the context and issues in a way that is genuinely interesting and concurrently provides material for forming your own opinions. The style is very readable and devoid of pretentious legal or scholarly jargon. For example, the word "tripartite" is never used when discussing the "Lemon test." It is very difficult for most people not to have biases with respect to religion cases but I think author makes a bona fide attempt to be balanced. In my opinion, there is a slight bias towards the separationist camp shown in the facts that are included in the book and those that are left out. However, the book mostly depicts the participants in a fair and generally-positive light and it is definitely not an ideological rant. The book also confirms my belief that people can be respectful of other people and their beliefs, even when their own beliefs are diametrically opposed--a fact that I found out when I was selected for law review.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
6 of 6 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Very interesting, August 25, 2007
This review is from: God on Trial: Dispatches from America's Religious Battlefields (Hardcover)
The first two chapters of GOT review the historical background of the First Amendment, including the shocking religious intolerance in early American territories, various arguments surrounding the First Amendment's passage in 1789, its original inapplicability to state governments, more religious strife in the 1800s, the "incorporation" process through which the First Amendment was finally ruled to be binding on the states too, and some of the first "separation" cases. Of particular interest were the all too brief sections indicating that, just as the Devil can quote Scripture for his purposes, so too can Supreme Court justices quote historical figures for their purposes. Also interesting was the history of the origin of "Americans United for Separation of Church and State." I don't want to give away the whole plot, but in the beginning, Americans United was not exactly opposed by evangelical Protestants!
Chapter 3 provides some background data on Barry Lynn and Jay Sekulow, the most prominent Separationist and Religious Right lawyers today.
Chapters 4 through 8 describe six prominent separation cases: the Mount Soledad Cross in San Diego; the Football-Game Prayer in Santa Fe, TX; Ten Commandments cases from KY and TX; the Pledge of Allegiance case from Elk Grove, CA; and the Intelligent Design vs. evolution case from Dover, PA. Each chapter reviews the historical background and facts of the case, including key parts of its litigation history (Newdow's appearance before the Supreme Court in the Pledge of Allegiance case was particularly interesting); summarizes the final decision, usually a Supreme Court decision; and then comments on key aspects of the decision, including how it fits in with other rulings. Each chapter also includes a background sketch of one or two of the plaintiffs and defendants in the case.
The background sketches, including those of Lynn and Sekulow, were only mildly interesting. Some of them showed how courageous the plaintiffs were in standing up to the bullying and violent threats of the so-called "Christians" who opposed them; but several served only to show how ordinary the participants in the cases were. That's an interesting fact itself, of course, but I personally would've preferred a bit more on the legal issues and a bit less on the personalities.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
|
|
Most Recent Customer Reviews
|
