Customer Reviews

Godfather of the Kremlin: the Life and Times of Boris Berezovsky

5 star:		(26)
4 star:		(8)
3 star:		(8)
2 star:		(3)
1 star:		(15)

 

 

Mr. Paul Klebnikov makes a rather unusual declaration at the beginning of his book by stating that what is about to be read may be difficult to believe. As this work is non-fiction the comment would seem misplaced. However once the reading has begun it not only proves to have been appropriate, but is a fact you will keep reminding yourself of.

The Author relates what is arguably the greatest theft in History, and if he had decided to change some detail, he could have had an outstanding novel. That the events he relates actually took place makes for a reading experience no novel can compete with. I have been following Mr. Klebnikov's stories in Forbes, since December of 1996 when he introduced Mr. Boris Berezovsky as Russia's Godfather. That first article in Forbes brought the wrath of Mr. Berezovsky to bear on Forbes and the Author, but he continued with his research and lived to write this book. Whatever his personal motivation was, and continues to be, is remarkable. This man worked for years on the home field of a variety of people who were capable of removing him from the living, with a glance, and without any fear of consequence to themselves.

The dysfunctional, amoral, nothing is out of bounds world, that was Boris Yeltsin's Russia, truly is difficult to get your mind around. Some minor details that will prepare you for the real story; when Gorbachev was still in power the government budget received 25% of its revenues from where, from the Government monopoly on Vodka! The ruble of Gorbachev was worth approximately one U.S. dollar. At the close of 1992 one dollar would cost 415 rubles, and when Yeltsin finally left office in an alcoholic haze, if you wanted a dollar you needed 28,000 rubles!

The "Voucher Auctions" that took place in 1993 and 1994 would not have been condoned much less implemented by a student with a semester or two of Economic study. Gazprom, which owns one third of the planet's Natural Gas, was "auctioned" for $250 million dollars, the truer value, if valued as a Western Company, would have had its gas reserves alone valued at between $300 and $700 BILLION. These numbers do not take into account that the company was basically a monopoly supplier to the entire former Soviet Union, and much of Western Europe as well.

To put a more familiar face on these numbers, at the very lowest estimate, you could have bought Exxon and had $12 billion left over, at the high end you could have bought General Electric, the most valuable company as I write, and since you might be thirsty after the effort, you could pick up Coca Cola with the change left from the GE purchase.

You will learn how Mr. Berezovsky privatized the cash flows of companies like Aeroflot, companies he did not own, and by using little money, if any at all, and if he needed any the seller, The Government would supply it. He was not the only man to take advantage of Yeltsin and his hand picked group of incompetents but he surely was the master at the game.

This book will leave you stunned. How much to buy the election for Yeltsin, read the book, how often Yeltsin was sober, the facts will alarm you, how Tanya his beloved daughter who knew nothing that qualified her for Government, became the power behind her Father, often doing the bidding of Mr. Berezovsky, who are you ready for this, was appointed to the Government by good old Yeltsin himself.

The wholesale rape of Russia's assets is worse than any damage that Russia has ever been through. Those who dared to challenge the system of "Kleptocracy" were easy to identify, they were either already buried, were bleeding, or about to be assassinated. You played by the rules of thieves or you were removed, it was that simple.

I have read many metaphors in other places that compare the Mafiyas' in Russia today to the Robber Barons of this Country of a century or more ago. Anyone who puts forth this argument is painfully ignorant of History. It is true that the men who carried the sobriquet Robber Baron were not individuals whose paths you would have wished to cross, for as businessmen they were ruthless. That is where the comparison ends, for the bottom line is that they built this country, and while there were times violence took place it is only the inept that would compare it to the thousands murdered, and the millions who died as the result of Russia being taken apart and given away. Russia was eviscerated with the Government's consent and its participation, and the consequences to the citizenry at large had not been as premeditative in their design or as destructive since Stalin.

I liked this quote from a top Russian Official, "it is very difficult to determine whether it's incompetence or embezzlement".

Paul Klebnikov died yesterday (7/10/04) in Moscow because he had the courage to print the truth as he uncovered it through relentless investigative journalism. Anyone--such as some of the reviewers at this site--who dismisses this book because of some trivial libel suit brought by Berezovsky in London is making a mistake. Klebnikov was no small-time journalist with an axe to grind. He had a PhD in Russian history from the London School of Economics and was a senior editor for Forbes magazine. He was an American of Russian heritage who spoke Russian fluently and who used his abilities to investigate the looting of Russia that took place in the early 1990's. He loved Russia and wrote what he learned about the looting that was going on.

Everything Klebnikov says in this book can also be found in The Oligarchs by Hoffman (Washington Post), Putin's Russia by Shevtsova (Carnegie Endowment) and The Tragedy of Russia's Reforms by Reddaway (George Washington University). They all cite and/or quote Klebnikov with approval.

I can't recommend this book highly enough to anyone who wants an introduction to the murky world of Russian privatization during the '90's.

Incidentally, Berezovsky actually took out a full-page ad in the New York Times to tell the world he is not a crook. However, like some of the other oligarchs, he is wanted in Russia for tax evasion, fraud, etc. Read the book and find out all about him.

I remember my first visit to the Soviet Union in 1986. Gorbachev had
recently come into power and one could sense that dramatic events
would soon take place. The "Evil Empire" was showing cracks
and strains of trying to keep up with capatilists. The Russian people
for over 70 years were asked to sacrifice for the glories of
Communism. Five short years later Yeltsin was standing on a tank and
America's hero, Gorbachev saw his power come to an end. Hope sprang
eternal. Glasnost and perestroika. Then came the Yeltsin years which
were witness to the wholesale rape and pillaging of of a great
country with an educated public and vast resources. How did it
happen? Mr. Klebnikov's important book meticulously outlines how in
less than a decade tens of billions of dollars were stolen by a bunch
of unscrupulous men who could care less about the effects their acts
would have in devastating the country they lived in. By concentrating
on the most successful of these "oligarchs", to use a polite
term, the brazen rise of Boris Berezovsky is detailed courageously by
Mr. Klebnikov. He describes the murders, the methodology (steal low,
sell high), the willing and unwilling accomplices, and the total lack
of morality. What a tragedy. One thinks of the some 700,000 orphans
now in Russia mainly as a result of mothers being unable to feed their
infants. And where is the money? Sitting in European banks and
elsewhere outside of Russia. At least the robber barons of the 19th
Century rechannelled their millions back into the U. S. economy and
left us with Carnegie Hall, the University of Chicago and the Frick
Museum.. It may be some consolation if Putin is able to arrest a few
of these criminals. Or is he too, bought and paid for? Read this
book.

Paul Klebnikov brings to vigorous, swashbuckling life Russia from the death of Leonid Brezhnev (11/10/1982) up to and slightly beyond the resignation of Boris Yeltsin (12/31/99) in favor of Vladimir Putin. A principal literary technique the author uses is to contrast various players: politicians Gorbachev and Yeltsin or Generals Lebed and Grachev, for example. Klebnikov presents no more striking Russian "parallel lives" than those of oligarchs Boris Berezovsky and Vladimir Gusinsky.

Mikhail Gorbachev seems a passably decent, honorable man in the pages of GODFATHER OF THE KREMLIN. Paul Klebnikov's pageant locates, however, almost all his other players at various positions on a wide scale of sheer criminality, venality, murderousness and self-seeking. On that scale Gusinsky is comparatively (and only comparatively) a good guy, while Berezovsky wears a black hat.

Yet the parallels are striking, with the implication that for a time Godfather Berezovsky played "me, too" or "catch up" to Gusinsky. In 1989 Gusinsky partnered with an American, Berezovksy with an Italian. In 1991 Gusinsky established Most Bank, Berezovsky started one, too. Both went after an Aeroflot account. Both reached out for newspapers and TV networks.

But there was one big difference. "In contrast to Berezovsky, who liked to take over existing enterprises, Gusinsky created entirely new companies. He added value to the Russian economy. ... Unlike Berezovsky, Gusinsky could legitimately claim to have played a constructive role in the Russian economy" (p. 148f).

Absent good government and a moral business culture in Russia, Berezovsky and most if not all the other oligarchs found sheer piracy and looting of wealth created by others the easiest way to grow personally rich. Neither Berezovsky nor Gusinsky is remotely as benign or constructive as America's so-called "robber barons" such as Rockefeller, Ford, Carnegie and Morgan (who were neither criminals nor looters). But in a brilliant tour d'horizon of Russian society sketched in the author's Epilogue at pp. 322--326, Boris Berezovksy comes across as both criminal and looter, while Vladimir Gusinsky seems merely criminal. Is it possible that the best that can be hoped for of private Russian business in the next decade is that the Berezevskys will decrease while the Gusinskys will increase? Will both dreadful types ultimately be replaced by hard driving but morally upright businessmen more like Steve Jobs, Ross Perot or Don Rumsfeld? -OOO-

What is capital flight? According to the author, a man named Boris Berezovsky was quite the expert at this. Take over a Russian company with government funds, kill anyone who gets in the way, and take over its assets by funnelling them out of the country, or filling filthy Chechen rebels' pockets with ransom money thus stripping the country of its vital tax assets to pay for social programs, pensions and wages.

What isn't good about this book has been the reviews. Some are calling it bunk because Berezovsky is in Spain now, or the author wrote the book at the time he was involved in a lawsuit with the man, but they don't get specific enough about why this discredits the book. To dismiss Berezovsky as not being capable of the fiscal atrocities he has caused Russia is to dismiss Stalin, Hitler and Napoleon as well. Of course the former didn't commit his acts alone(the book is clear about this) and neither did the latter.

Insofar as to the credibility of this manuscript, Harcourt and Amazon.com both have some apologizing to do for selling what could be a complete joke or they don't have to do anything at all because what Klebnikov wrote is indeed factual.

What do I believe? I truly believe this book confirms that Boris Yeltsin screwed the Russian people out of millions of their own rubles and did so because he allowed a kniving little Russian business mogul and thief named Boris Berezovsky to do so. This book explains this relationship very well. I would also like to request that any negative review of this book be accompanied by similarly massive appendices and footnotes to the contrary that Klebnikov afforded his readers to clarify his findings.

Klebnikov puts his detailed documentation the rise and predicting the twilight of bandit capitalism during Yeltsin's reign in a very readable format. The Berezovsky tale is just one of the tragic stories that arose from a dark era for Russia's political and economic sectors where massive corruption and gangster outrage was rampant.

However, Klebnikov's account focuses mainly on Berezovsky, which is probably why some readers might find this narrow. There is a tad too much exaggeration, but most of what you find in there does come from reliable sources (which are also painstakingly listed in the book so readers can do further research if they're interested) and many of his deductions are believable.

We should also take note that Berezovsky is a dangerous man, and during Yeltsin's presidency, was one of the a handful of powerful men who were responsible for "the robbery of the century" and that when he rose, Russia declined. However, Klebnikov has not been able to capture the other oligarchs that rose in the era of bandit-capitalism in the same light, although some of these "bandits" are just as or even more dangerous as Berezovsky. This is not a well-balanced piece of writing. The "Robbery of the Century" wasn't carried out by one man alone.

Everybody should read this book - it helps to put the entire Litvinenko killing in perspective ; the dead Russian spy worked for Berezovsky - given Berezovsky long criminal history it would not be surprising at all that he was directly involved in murdering his own employee as part of his long ongoing campaign to overthrow the democratically elected president Putin and thereby illegally regain control of all of Russia's natural resources including in particular Russia's oil and gas wealth.

Paul Klebnikov was a brave Russian-American journalist who took on the Oligarchs (Godfather of the Kremlin), the Mafia (in Russian Forbe's), and the Chechnyan terrorists (Interviews with the Barbarians), and died because of it. He was gunned down by a Checnyan hitman, probaly paid for by one of the Oligarch gangsters he exposed. Godfather of the Kremlin is not an easy book to read, but I gave it five stars because of the bravery it took for Paul to write it. The main villain is Boris Berozovsky, but Yeltsin was also to blame for thieving and privatization that made him, his daughter, and a handful of Oligarchs extreemly rich. Whiole destroying the life-savings of the average Russian citizens and the economy. If you think Enron is a huge crook, it has nothing on Berezovsky and the Oligarchs. They were ruthless, and deserved to be put in jail or exiled. It was only too bad a journalist as brave, excellent and trustable as Paul Klebnikov had to lose his life by exposing their crimes!

I am halfway through this incredible book and it deeply disturbs me that American Paul Klebnikov died because of this book and other articles he wrote while working in Russia for Forbes Magazine. Of late, all one reads is how someone incredibly powerful managed to get off the hook in one way or another. I am just weary of all the lies in the press and the deceitful 'spin' that the US media gives to people they find useful. No, we don't kill our reporters, but we ruin them in other ways. I hope I live long enough to see this change, but I fear it won't happen in my lifetime. I have learned from personal experiences in my life that 99 percent of what I have read and believed to be true was a lie. It starts with Santa Claus and moves on from there. This book has made me want to read more about Russia, the people, and the various governments. How sad I spent half of my life living in fear of the Russians, and they us. I tried to find 'Conversations With A Barbarian', also by Mr. Klebnikov, but it is no longer available. I feel so awful for his family and friends.

In reading some of the reviews posted here, I can't help but notice some seriously spurious, if not downright naive, arguments regarding the book's authenticity, to wit: That because Berezovsky "successfully" sued for libel in a London court, he is therefore innocent of the claims suggested against him in Klebnikov's book.

First of all, he did not sue successfully. His suit was withdrawn when Forbes agreed to print a retraction stating that the magazine should not have linked Berezovsky to the killing of Vladimir Listyev. This does not constitue a successful suit, but a settlement.

Second, this settlement hardly indicates innocence on the part of Berezovsky. Read the following from the International Freedom of Expression Exchange:

"London is known as the "libel capital of the world," a haven for rich and powerful claimants from other countries who are using the courts to stifle scrutiny of their dealings, reports "Index on Censorship" magazine. With financial factors increasingly determining whether publishers choose to defend their writers in English courts, there are fears that the country's libel laws are casting a chill over freedom of expression." (The complete article can be found here: http://canada.ifex.org/en/content/view/full/60451/?PHPSESSID=2b1f7ff0edc7f2437a6e98e16460e278)

Third, the claim that because Berezovsky is now living "humbly" in Spain, he is somehow innocent is absurd. He's living in Spain because he had to flee Russia after an investigation was launched against him for siphoning off cash from Aeroflot.

Nowhere in the book does Klebnikov claim that Berezovsky killed Listyev--he even suggests that Berezovsky may not have killed him. He merely shows what Berezovsky stood to gain, and in fact did gain, from the murder.

As for the claim that Klebnikov's sources have disavowed him, this too must be looked at with some doubt. Consider the political-economic climate in Russia: This is a place where newspapers routinely make up stories, or at the very least neglect to check the facts, where witnesses to murder trials rountinely recant their testimony once in court and where some 15 journalists, including Klebnikov, have been murderd since 2000. Is it any surprise that some of these sources might want to reconsider what they said to Klebnikov once his articles started drawing international attention? I don't think so.

As for Klebnikov's journalistic credentials, I can't speak for those, but the book does come well researched, even if it's a bit dry and a touch wooden. Still, I find it an interesting book that delves into bot the business and political workings in Russia. It's sad that he was killed for his efforts.

In sum, those suggesting the book should be discredited on the basis of a single Google search should probably look more closely into what exactly they're reading and not simply believe everything that appears on the internet.