On the Gods and Other Essays [Hardcover]

Robert G. Ingersoll (Author)

Book Description

Publication Date: June 1990

Robert G Ingersoll (1833-1899) was perhaps the most famous American of his day. As an enlightened freethinker and pioneer of humane, rational, and agnostic views, Ingersoll was a tireless advocate of rational thought, who battled superstition and hypocrisy wherever he found it. This dedicated populariser would regularly address huge audiences, opening their minds to ideas that often provoked guarded whispers in private. Ingersoll was a man far ahead of his time, advocating such progressive causes as agnosticism, birth control, voting rights for women, the advancement of science, civil rights, and freedom of speech. His advocacy of such iconoclastic ideals made a lasting impression on his own and later generations. Although Robert Ingersoll lived before the development of the Secular Humanist Movement, there is no doubt that he qualifies as one of the great heroes of the Humanist Pantheon.The five essays, long out of print, that have been selected for this volume capture Robert Ingersoll at his eloquent best. They express his anti-clericalism and his defence of agnosticism and rationalism. "The Gods" examines religion and its relationship to the happiness - or despair - of humankind; "Thomas Paine" amplifies the contributions of that great advocate of liberty and free will; "Individuality" probes the importance of reason and rationality over blind faith; "Heretics and Heresies" examines the church, the Bible, and religious persecution; and "The Ghosts" surveys the relationship of supernatural belief to intellectual fear and ignorance.

Editorial Reviews

Review

""A welcome addition to the Ingersoll materials now in print."

Product Details

• Hardcover: 177 pages
• Publisher: Prometheus Books (June 1990)
• Language: English
• ISBN-10: 0879756292
• ISBN-13: 978-0879756291
• Product Dimensions: 9.4 x 6.4 x 0.8 inches
• Shipping Weight: 1 pounds (View shipping rates and policies)
• Average Customer Review: 3.0 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (1 customer review)
• Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #1,859,919 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

More About the Author

Discover books, learn about writers, read author blogs, and more.

Customer Reviews

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

1 of 1 people found the following review helpful:

3.0 out of 5 stars A look at 19th century "free thinking" rhetoric., July 29, 2011

By 

B. Marold "Bruce W. Marold" (Bethlehem, PA United States) - See all my reviews
(TOP 100 REVIEWER)    (HALL OF FAME REVIEWER)    (REAL NAME)   

Amazon Verified Purchase

This review is from: On the Gods and Other Essays (Hardcover)

"On the Gods and Other Essays" collected from works by Robert Green Ingersoll is a few assorted essays, bound and priced to provide funds to preserve the Ingersoll birthplace as a museum in the town of Dresden, in western New York State.
The essay which will attract everyone's attention is the first, "On the Gods". This is just as well, because reading it reveals that Ingersoll is a lightweight in almost every regard except for his reputation as an orator which, since he worked before Edison invented the phonograph, we cannot fully appreciate. If a work is really weak, or really strong, it usually shows up on the first page, and this is no exception. The very first line says "Each nation has created a god, and that god has always resembled his creators." In simple-minded terms, it is false, because first, some nations, such as ancient Greece and Rome, Egypt, Babylonia, Persia, India, and the Scandinavian peoples created many gods. (To be sure, a few pages later, Ingersoll amplifies his statement, accounting for the crowded pantheons of gods and the borrowing from one nation to the next. But the whole style is intentionally polemical, taking no notice of having made sensationalistic statements.) And, some nations, such as Italy, Spain, France, Germany, and England never created A god, but borrowed first the pagan gods, then the Christian God from missionaries. Third, by the time Ingersoll spoke these words, the idea in European philosophical and theological circles was old hat, having been the principle thesis of Ludwig Feuerbach's important 1841 work, "The Nature of Christianity". To be sure, American seminaries were about 100 years behind the new style of research being done in Germany, but they have more than caught up. Today, Feuerbach's thesis is the standard anthropological understanding of the origins of religion. Ingersoll similarly borrows ideas about the formation of ideas from the English empiricists, Locke and Hume, which were over 100 years old when Ingersoll spoke.

Ingersoll's general method is to take some literary, metaphorical statement in the Bible or other religious text and interpret literally, giving the impression that there are people who believe the literal statements. I will not deny that in some places, there may be people who believe the first chapter of Genesis is literally true, but that is not what is taught in most seminaries, and it is probably not what most clerics listening to Ingersoll actually believed. (Note, again, I said most. There will certainly be exceptions, and finding a few does not vitiate my point. The foundation of liberal Protestant theology which vitiated much of what Ingersoll said began with Friedrich Schleiermacher in 1822 - 23.)

Probably the worst misrepresentation in this essay is when Ingersoll says "...religion hates science, faith detests reason, and theology is the sworn enemy of theology..." For most of the history of Christianity, this was patently false. Today, religion and science co-exist quite nicely, thank you. Faith is not the enemy of reason. Martin Luther, in his "Table talk" for example, was quite respectful of Aristotle (the inventor of Logic). And, from roughly 200 CE to 1800 CE, the most important philosophers were also the most innovative theologians. And even in the 19th century, Hegel and Kierkegaard represented a philosophical interpretation of Christianity. (Make that a probable for Hegel, as I am not as familiar with him as with most other philosophers.) The touted Renaissance antipathy of the church to science is as much due to a change in an understanding of how science is to be done as a conflict between faith and observation. Theologians, especially those like Jonathan Edwards, generally had no problem accepting the "book of the world" along with the scripture.

There are people who really enjoy reading this, as it appears to them to be a validation of their choosing to not follow any religious faith. The sad thing is that this is such a weak reed of misunderstanding on which to base a feeling that "there are people on my side." It they took but one good course on religion, they would see that most of what Ingersoll said was buncombe, inflated to appear plausible to those who did not have the access to information which would show Ingersoll wrong.

So, the book has some value as a report on the kind of misrepresentation which was and can be done on the statements of faith. Considering the price, you may prefer finding Ingersoll's texts on the Internet.