- Buy a CD or a vinyl record, get a $1 Amazon MP3 Credit. Limit one promotional credit per customer. Here's how (restrictions apply)
| |||||||||||||||
Product Details
Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images? |
| 1. Aria | |||
| 2. Variation 1 | |||
| 3. Variation 2 | |||
| 4. Variation 3 | |||
| 5. Variation 4 | |||
| 6. Variation 5 | |||
| 7. Variation 6 | |||
| 8. Variation 7 | |||
| 9. Variation 8 | |||
| 10. Variation 9 | |||
| 11. Variation 10 | |||
| 12. Variation 11 | |||
| 13. Variation 12 | |||
| 14. Variation 13 | |||
| 15. Variation 14 | |||
| 16. Variation 15 | |||
| 17. Variation 16 | |||
| 18. Variation 17 | |||
| 19. Variation 18 | |||
| 20. Variation 19 | |||
|
| |||
One thing that is distinctive of Glenn Gould, is the way he manages to play very fast, yet we can still clearly hear every single note. This is apparent in some of the variations here that are played very (too?) fast. But what I thought was extermely good in this recording, is the way Glenn Gould can be soft and touching at times, and hard and fast at other times. We are given the impression that Glenn Gould is telling us a story. The result is very satisfying.
But be warned. This is not Bach as it was intented to be. Lets forget that this is played on a piano for a minute. Glenn Gould's interpretation of the Goldberg Variations can shock some purists. First, like I said before, it is played extremely fast at times. I doubt this is what Bach had in mind. Also, Glenn Gould has this bad habit of putting stacattos everywhere. This is not as annoying as it can be in his interpretation of Bach's Well Tempered Clavier, but still.
Also, another warning for those who do not know of this pianist. Glenn Gould used to sing when he was playing. Not to loud. Just a little hum. But you can hear him on his recordings. If I recall well, he insisted his voice was left on the recordings, because he thought that removing his voice would hurt the quality of the recording.
So anyway, this is still my favourite interpretation of Bach's Goldberg Variations on piano. And it must be the most popular interpretation out there. I still prefer Kenneth Gilbert on the harpsicord, but it is definitely a must-buy if you ask me.
The first purchased was the Sony 1955 edition, and I listened to it constantly while reading, working on the computer, or even taking a nap.
A few months later I ordered the 1982 recording and was astonished at the difference. The later recording had a much slower pace and seemed much more reflective to my un-tutored ear. I was so surprised I went out and purchased two other recordings: one by Chen Pi-hsien, on piano; and Anthony Newman, on harpsichord. There is a strange difference in the Pi-hsien recording to my un-educated ear; as if she doesn't strike the keys with the same power, and sharpness as Gould. The Newman quickly becomes boring due to the inflexability of that instument, though I presume it is closer to the original clavier for which the Variations were written.
Over the last year or so, I have given both Gould versions to friends, as well as bullying others to purchase it.
Try to listen to both variations of Gould's Goldberg Variations, and see which you prefer. While first impressions may remain strongest, and I still prefer Gould to others, I found a slightly more pleasant shift in timing in the later version.