Enter your mobile number or email address below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
To get the free app, enter your email address or mobile phone number.
The Gospel according to Mark (Pillar New Testament Commentary) Hardcover – November 8, 2001
|New from||Used from|
Top 20 lists in Books
View the top 20 best sellers of all time, the most reviewed books of all time and some of our editors' favorite picks. Learn more
Frequently Bought Together
Customers Who Bought This Item Also Bought
About the Author
More About the Author
My primary research interests include Biblical studies and history of the early church, with secondary interests in the Reformation and history of the twentieth-century German Church struggle. In pursuit of these I am a frequent visitor to Christian sites, libraries, and monasteries in Germany, Greece, Turkey, and Israel.
I hold academic degrees from Whitworth University (B.A.), Princeton Theological Seminary (M.Div.), and Fuller Theology Seminary (Ph.D.), and have studied further at the universities of Zuerich and Tuebingen, Tyndale House (Cambridge), and the Center of Theological Inquiry (Princeton). A DAAD grant from Germany government allowed me to investigate the disappearance and death of Professor Ernst Lohmeyer.
I am currently Bruner-Welch Professor Emeritus of Theology at Whitworth University, Spokane, Washington. Email: email@example.com
Top Customer Reviews
Some of this one-sided comparison is ok. Many of today's scholars believe Mark is the earliest gospel and the other Synoptic gospels are partially dependent on it for source material. That's alright. But if you read this commentary carefully, soon it might dawn on you that the writer sees the other gospels in a way conservative evangelicals should not.
The problem reaches a climax in Mark 14, the episode of Jesus' arrest where the ear of the high priest's servant was severed. John 18:10 names the attacker as Peter but Edwards considers this to be nothing more than unreliable "later tradition". Let me quote from the commentary (pp 438-439):
"Later tradition identified Peter as the sword-wielding assailant, but this is not as certain as is often assumed, for Mark attributes the deed not to a disciple but "to one of those standing near". This same phrase will appear in vv 69-70, where it obviously does not refer to disciples. It is far more likely that the arrest squad, and not the disciples, were armed with swords. Indeed, if the assailant were a disciple we should expect an arrest to follow. But no arrest follows, which at least suggests that the severed ear fell from the misguided valor of a henchman rather than of a disciple or Peter. Peter, of course, figures prominently in the events of chap. 14 and is likely Mark's source of much of it.Read more ›
The primary interest lies in the fact that less than 200 years ago, the basic opinions on dating Mark changed from its being considered a copy of Matthew to being an earlier source of both Matthew and Luke. This lively discussion was enriched even further by exegesis in the last 50 years, with the founding of `redactive' analysis by Marxson in Germany.
I've surveyed five different exegeses of Mark and have found much common ground, but also many differences, lying primarily in the translations and in the extent to which they address the history of commentary on Mark. Even though some of the volumes deal much more deeply with previous scholarship than others, all limit themselves to work done in the 20th century, and even to work done in the last 50 years. One thing I must say that although there are important differences, all of these volumes represent sound work at the deepest levels of scholarship. Some are more suitable for pastoral use than others, but none are `lightweights'.
The six volumes I surveyed follow:
`The Gospel According to Mark', William L. Lane, 1974, Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., `The New International Commentary on the New Testament' Series.
`Mark 1-8:26', Robert A.Read more ›
As a pastor, I have especially benefited from the conceptual work in this commentary. It is not uncommon for verse by verse works to get lost in the weeds (pastorally speaking), or segmented from itself as it pours over words, their origins, and their possible interpretations. Edwards, however, is consistent in keeping his eyes on the sweeping themes of Mark, especially discipleship. Not only is there rich commentary in the introductory paragraphs of each section, but within the verse by verse work as well.
I highly recommend this book as a well-grounded, evangelical commentary that does a phenomenal job of providing conceptual and pastoral insight along the way. It has been a joy to use.
Most Recent Customer Reviews
I'm a pastor taking my congregation through the book of Mark. This has been an almost in-dispensable commentary. Read morePublished 20 days ago by Kevin RK Davis
GREAT BOOK ESPECIALLY SINCE I HEARD THE AUTHOR SPEAK RECENTLY.Published 3 months ago by MAURICE LEGARE
Nothing sloppy, but nothing especially helpful. Last Commentary on Mark that I turn to. Not a commentary that I would buy again, unless one is just looking for a simple grounded... Read morePublished 5 months ago by T. REEVES
Excellent reformed commentary. Helpful insight into the gospel of Mark. Very clearly written and easy to understand for all levels. Read morePublished 8 months ago by Dylan
I really like James Edwards' style. His Luke commentary (Pillar) is expected to be published in April 2015. Hopefully, it will include the kindle edition. Read morePublished 10 months ago by Sue from CA
Excellent book! I highly recommend this book when you are studying the book of Mark. Great help in understanding the culture the times and most importantly fleshing out the Word of... Read morePublished 13 months ago by Maria Elings
Highly recommended commentary. The Pillar series is thorough and conservative. The volume on Mark is accessible and of value to ministers and students.Published 13 months ago by Uncle Thesis
Well researched. Good for pastor or layman wanting a good commentary on mark.Published 13 months ago by Bobby Wood
I use this commentary regularly and it is the best one I have used. I recommend it frequently to others as Biblically sound, academically honest and well organize commentary.Published 16 months ago by GKB