Government by Judiciary (NONE) and over one million other books are available for Amazon Kindle. Learn more



or
Sign in to turn on 1-Click ordering
More Buying Choices
Have one to sell? Sell yours here
Start reading Government by Judiciary (NONE) on your Kindle in under a minute.

Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.
Sorry, this item is not available in
Image not available for
Color:
Image not available

To view this video download Flash Player

 

Government by Judiciary [Paperback]

Raoul Berger
3.5 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (6 customer reviews)

List Price: $14.50
Price: $13.78 & FREE Shipping on orders over $25. Details
You Save: $0.72 (5%)
o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o
Only 7 left in stock (more on the way).
Ships from and sold by Amazon.com. Gift-wrap available.
Want it Thursday, June 20? Choose One-Day Shipping at checkout. Details
Free Two-Day Shipping for College Students with Amazon Student

Formats

Amazon Price New from Used from
Kindle Edition $8.19  
Hardcover $25.65  
Paperback $13.78  
Amazon.com Textbooks Store
Shop the Amazon.com Textbooks Store and save up to 70% on textbook rentals, 90% on used textbooks and 60% on eTextbooks.

Book Description

June 1, 1997 0865971447 978-0865971448 New Edition

The Justices, who are virtually unaccountable, irremovable, and irreversible, have taken over from the people control of their own destiny.

— Raoul Berger

It is the thesis of this monumentally argued book that the United States Supreme Court—largely through abuses of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution—has embarked on "a continuing revision of the Constitution, under the guise of interpretation." Consequently, the Court has subverted America's democratic institutions and wreaked havoc upon Americans' social and political lives.

One of the first constitutional scholars to question the rise of judicial activism in modern times, Raoul Berger points out that "the Supreme Court is not empowered to rewrite the Constitution, that in its transformation of the Fourteenth Amendment it has demonstrably done so. Thereby the Justices, who are virtually unaccountable, irremovable, and irreversible, have taken over from the people control of their own destiny, an awesome exercise of power."

The Court has accomplished this transformation by ignoring or actually distorting the original intent of both the framers and the supporters of the Fourteenth Amendment. In school desegregation and legislative reapportionment cases, for example, the Court manipulated the history, meaning, and purpose of the amendment's Equal Protection Clause in order to achieve a desired political result. In cases involving First Amendment freedoms and the rights of the accused, the judges converted the Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process Clause into a vehicle for the nationalization of the Bill of Rights. Yet these actions were nothing less than "usurpations" that robbed "from the States a power that unmistakably was left to them."

This new second edition includes the original text of 1977 and extensive supplementary discourses in which the author assesses and rebuts the responses of his critics.

Raoul Berger retired in 1976 as Charles Warren Senior Fellow in American Legal History, Harvard University.


Frequently Bought Together

Government by Judiciary + The Politically Incorrect Guide to the Constitution (Politically Incorrect Guides)
Price for both: $27.80

Buy the selected items together


Editorial Reviews

About the Author

Raoul Berger

Product Details

  • Paperback: 578 pages
  • Publisher: Liberty Fund; New Edition edition (June 1, 1997)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 0865971447
  • ISBN-13: 978-0865971448
  • Product Dimensions: 1.4 x 6 x 8.8 inches
  • Shipping Weight: 2 pounds (View shipping rates and policies)
  • Average Customer Review: 3.5 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (6 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #701,391 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

Customer Reviews

3.5 out of 5 stars
(6)
3.5 out of 5 stars
Share your thoughts with other customers
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
3 of 3 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars Assiduously Researched and Documented. May 24, 2012
Format:Paperback|Amazon Verified Purchase
Berger's tome is an expansive exposition of the most erroneous turn our governmental structure has ever taken. From democratic republic to oligarchy in one case. The U.S Supreme Court took an 84 year old amendment and bent it to fit its desired outcome in a single case resulting in the creation of an imperial body of unelected, lifetime appointed members who now have a thumbs up or thumbs down vote on every issue considered by any elected body in the entire country.
Comment | 
Was this review helpful to you?
19 of 28 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars Pure Honesty June 6, 2005
Format:Hardcover|Amazon Verified Purchase
Regardless of liberal, revisionist history, the Fourteenth Amendment was never intended to be, nor was it used by, its ratifiers to enforce thorough-going racial equality in the United States. To the contrary, the Amendment was designed to give newly emancipated slaves equality under protective laws, not equal application of all laws. In laymans terms, the Amendment guranteed minimal civil rights--the rights to enter into and enforce contracts at law and general police protection, but not full social rights such as desegregated schools public facilities. Indeed, Jim Crow is a northern invention of progressive Northerners that was imported to the South. And, nobody believed that mandated segregation was a violative of the Fourteenth Amendment in any way.

Evil the Amendment may have been in its lack of scope, but its shortcomings were caused by the rampant racism endemic to the United States at that time, both in the North and South alike, not by Berger. To the contray, Berger merely has had the courage to stand up against contemporary, PC, soft-tolitarianism and to state the undeniable historical facts regarding the original meaning and application of the Fourteenth Amendment as well as contrast this originalism to the more recent, revistionist reinterpretation and applications by the Court. Looking to the bigger picture, what Berger does is challenge us to ponder whether going to all the fuss and bother of amending the Constitution to go beyond the very limited, original goals of the Fourthment Amendment might not have been a better course than giving the Supreme Court a quick-and-easy constitutional blue pen.

BTW, the "Pure Evil" review is pure crap.
Comment | 
Was this review helpful to you?
10 of 15 people found the following review helpful
4.0 out of 5 stars Written in '97 and very True Today July 17, 2006
Format:Paperback
This book is very true. There is an old Irish proverb, "The Road to Hell is paved with good intentions".

This book proves it.

Let's take "Brown". Now, is this poster saying that all children are not entitled to a fair education. Of course not! And it's terrible that the courts had to get involved to solve the education issue of allowing children-of-color to attend a white school. If the various governments had acted right then there would have been no reason for the courts to strike down unjust laws regarding race.

However, what is scary about "Brown" is it allows the courts to get involved in the smallest detail of public life. So, the courts were correct in helping minority children attend a school. But, the courts actions do not just stop there. Like a bite of an apples, this books shows instance after instance where the courts continously invent rights for items that were once a state matter, such as land use, or in international matters, such as when the courts were finding rights for terrorists of the IRA.

If anything this book under states the cases of too much judiciary in the goverment. The results are that various groups that make up the plantiffs of the USA have a disproportionate amount of power. Example, the ACLU has defacto established the Christmas policies of the USA with its lawsuits. No vote was ever held that removed the Christmas displays from government. It was all lawsuits.

How will this end? This poster does not know. Perhaps one day the courts will over step their authority, such as in the granting criminal rights to Terrorists at GITMO, and they will be introduced to real power.

Since the writing of this book in 1997 the role of the judiciary has expanded.
... Read more ›
Was this review helpful to you?
9 of 20 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars "Brown" Was Wrong: Response to Lewiston October 1, 2005
Format:Paperback|Amazon Verified Purchase
Yes, "Brown" was indeed wrong, if wrongness is judged by adherence to the Constitution, at any rate. More important, the Bill of Rights was never intended to apply to the States, but as a check against the power of the federal government. Berger is entirely consistent with the Constitutional understanding of those checks embodied in the Bill of Rights. Second, there are no such things as "civil rights." Wake up. All rights mentioned in the Constitution, if you assume that the Constitution is what it says it is, are given by a Creator (thus the "Liberty" mentioned in the Constitution is one of that Creator's "Blessings"). "Civil rights" are man-given, and man-taken-away; as such, they are worthless. "Civil rights" is chiefly a shibboleth emanating from the illegal 14th Amendment. In short, the Bill of Rights is not worth the paper it was written on if it were to apply to the States.
Comment | 
Was this review helpful to you?
3 of 19 people found the following review helpful
1.0 out of 5 stars Got it all wrong March 3, 2010
Format:Paperback
Berger's entire book -- in fact, pretty much his entire intellectual life -- is based on the notion that the Framers of the 14th Amendment never intended that it be applied as the courts have done, incorporating the Bill of Rights into the 14th and making them applicable to the states. Unfortunately for Berger, recent scholarship has proven conclusively that that's exactly what they intended. Check out Michael Kent Curtis' "No State Shall Abridge" or any of the books by Akhil Reed Amar. This isn't a "liberal" claim; the gun rights people relied on it to argue to the Supreme Court that the 2nd Amendment should be applied to the states.
Was this review helpful to you?
Most Recent Customer Reviews
Search Customer Reviews
Only search this product's reviews

What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?


Forums

There are no discussions about this product yet.
Be the first to discuss this product with the community.
Start a new discussion
Topic:
First post:
Prompts for sign-in
 



So You'd Like to...


Create a guide


Look for Similar Items by Category