146 of 151 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
The great American Stickup, September 8, 2010
This review is from: The Great American Stickup: How Reagan Republicans and Clinton Democrats Enriched Wall Street While Mugging Main Street (Paperback)
In this book, "deregulation" is a four-letter word: a synonym for leaving the U.S. taxpayer, U.S. markets and the U.S. reputation wide open to greedy mindless homegrown plutocrats. In short, it is a synonym for leaving the nation vulnerable to conscienceless unpatriotic Wall Street thieves.
Here in easy to understand language, Robert Scheer has pealed back the layers that cover up the whole stinking mess that has become "stripped-down vulnerable deregulated America." The method of robbery is basically a five-step political process: (1) "demagog" FDR and all existing regulations relentlessly as the enemy of free enterprise; (2) use paid lobbyist to help justify, tear-down and then rewrite new regulations; (3) use lobbyists' contributions to buy off the votes of key politicians in both parties to open up the laws for the impending thievery; (4) once legislation is passed, oversee the Wall Street financial casino with watchdogs that do not watch; and then (5) appoint members of the plutocracy who stand to gain the most, as facilitators and the palace guards of policy.
The present system of "high-level state sanctioned grand larceny" was designed and implemented, not by Ronald Reagan, or GW Bush, but by William Jefferson Clinton with the help of none other than the gang of four -- Timothy Geitner, Robert Rubin, Alan Greenspan, and Lawrence Summers. However, the unsung hero of the grand heist, was Windy Lee Gramm, senator Phil Gramm's paramour and then wife, (who as a grad student was first his lover and then very quickly his wife). It was this "devious duo" that engineered the plans for the ultimate robbery of the American economic system.
It was Windy's computer models, of exotic financial instruments that unleashed the derivatives market (of "securitized (packaged subprime bundles) loans, "credit default swaps," etc.) on an unsuspecting American public. She of course then was immediately promoted to an oversight position to oversee the very OTC commodities markets she had help prepare for raiding. Then before the flax hit the fan, she was out of "Dodge" and off to Enron, where there she helped with, among other things, some now infamous creative accounting.
However, the skids for raiding the U.S. financial markets had been well-greased before Mrs. Gramm rode into town on her husband's white horse. Roosevelt's New Deal Reforms, which had put a check on the Robber Baron's of the 1920s had been under attack since Ronald Reagan's administration. But Reagan got no further than "attack rhetoric." It took the "faux liberal," Bill Clinton, and his gang of four (Rubin, Geithner, Greenspan, and Summers) to put Reagan's ideas into practice and to then pull off the ultimate economic heist. Once their buddies had their billions, and all the illicit bonuses were paid, only then did we realized that the U.S. treasury had been sacked in broad daylight.
But now Obama appears to be even "slicker" than "slick" Willie himself. While campaigning against the Clinton's during the democratic primary, Obama had used the "no financial tricks" economic guru, Warren Buffet as his chief economic advisor. Buffet had described the financial "dirty tricks" designed by Wendy Gramm and later fully implemented by "the gang of four as "Rubinomics," as "weapons of financial mass destruction."
During the run up to the election, Obama had essentially agreed with Buffet, that the Clinton/Bush/Gramm approach was headed straight to disaster. Yet, once in office, he not only changed his tune, but it seems he also had no place on his financial team for the renown Buffet. Instead, he retained as his chief advisors (and to preside over recovery from the "Gramm/Cheney/Bush/Clinton mess), the same "economic hit team" that underwrote the mess in the first place. So under Obama, the "the gang of four" got in on the ground floor to set up a new "kinder and gentler" version of America's casino capitalism, although one more carefully covered over with a thinly veiled limp-wristed set of regulations that are being sold to us by Barack Obama, Nancy Pelosi, Chris Dodd and Barney Frank as "real" financial regulations.
With Scheer's book, I guarantee that the next heist, which is already well into the making, will not be as quite as easy to pull over on the American people as the last one. Five Stars
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
56 of 56 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Crime: Public, Private and Bipartisan, September 22, 2010
This review is from: The Great American Stickup: How Reagan Republicans and Clinton Democrats Enriched Wall Street While Mugging Main Street (Paperback)
"Steal a little and they throw you in jail - Steal a lot and they make you king" - Bob Dylan
Imagine, for a moment, that a burly stranger takes your wallet, removes $20, and walks away. It stands to reason that, at the very least, you would want the culprit caught. You might even take the time to file a police report and describe the thief to a sketch artist. Now imagine instead, a very well dressed thief, with a dozen or so well dressed associates, who manage to take your house, your job, and even to diminish the value of your 401K, would you want this group caught just as badly? And if it turns out that this second heist was the work of identifiable thieves, would you spend the time necessary to learn who they were and how the deed was done? Or would you rather squeal and scream at whoever and whatever is directly in front of you?
That is the choice you face when deciding whether or not to read "The Great American Stickup: How Reagan Republicans and Clinton Democrats Enriched Wall Street While Mugging Main Street". In it, veteran journalist and Truthdig editor, Robert Scheer does exactly what the subtitle implies. He describes in detail how we got into the economic mess we are in.
Of course, everyone knows some of what happened. Most, probably suspect that both bankers and brokers had a hand in creating the real estate mess. Most have heard something about derivatives, CDOs, Alt-A loans, and subprime loans. And those government sponsored bank bailouts are, by now, infamous - even if there seems to be widespread confusion about which administration (Bush or Obama) did what. But when did this all start and what are the political, economic, and ideological connections? More simply, what is the answer to a question posed by a bewildered George W. Bush: "How did this happen?"
As Mr. Scheer tells it, the crime unfolded over almost 3 decades. Ronald Reagan laid the groundwork with the indispensible help of antiregulatory true believers Dr. Wendy Gramm and her husband, Senator Phil Gramm. Scheer carefully describes their efforts to overturn the financial regulatory system introduced by Franklin Roosevelt's New Deal. The top target, dubbed the "holy grail of Wall Street," was the 1933 Glass-Steagall Act, which regulated the financial services industry by erecting a wall between the commercial banks (entrusted with depositors' FDIC insured funds), investment banks, and insurance companies. Although by the end of Reagan's presidency Glass-Steagall remained in place, Scheer explains how President Reagan had been wildly successful on the ideological front in selling the view that big government was the cause economic stagnation.
Then, with Big Government as the newly accepted enemy of unrestricted wealth, the Republicans (in the Reagan and in both Bush administrations) found a way to achieve at least a part of what they wanted by appointing regulators who hated regulations. Thus, in 1988, Wendy Gramm became chair of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission. The foxes were now charged with guarding the henhouse.
While Scheer credits the Republicans with laying the necessary foundation, he is consistently nonpartisan and the real deregulatory victories are shown to come during the Clinton administration. Working in the ideologically anti-government atmosphere that he inherited, it is Bill Clinton, Treasury Secretary Robert Rubin, Larry Summers, Fed chair Alan Greenspan, along with the Republican Congress, that successfully ended Glass-Steagall.
The story is complex, but, as written here, understandable. The end of effective financial regulation, the end of Glass-Steagall, comes in 1999 with the Financial Services Modernization Act. A year later that is followed by the Commodity Futures Modernization Act, which insured the legality of unregulated over-the-counter derivatives and paved the way for the rise and fall of Enron and Arthur Anderson.
If this seems too much like a story composed of dry and difficult economic statistics it is not. Scheer laces the tale with fascinating details, like the inclusion in the Commodity Futures Modernization Act, of the "Enron loophole" which specifically exempted energy trading from regulatory scrutiny. And there is the story of the largely unsung heroine, Brooksley Born, who as the successor to Wendy Gramm at the Commodity Futures Trading Commission struggled valiantly to save us from the coming unregulated nightmare of unlimited over-the-counter derivatives including those labeled "Collateralized Debt Obligations" (CDOs) which allowed loan originators to retain no residual risk for loans they made to those obviously unable to pay.
The tale of Born's meeting with Alan Greenspan, attributed to an article published in Stanford Magazine, is almost surreal. Greenspan begins by saying to Born, "Well, Brooksley, I guess you and I will never agree about fraud." So Born asks, "What is there not to agree on?" "Well," Greenspan replies, "you probably will always believe that there should be laws against fraud, and I don't think there is any need for a law against fraud." Given what we now know about former NASDAQ chair, Bernie Madoff, Enron, Worldcom, and Global Crossing, it is not hard to imagine this Alan Greenspan as a character in Alice in Wonderland with Alice remarking, off to the side, "curiouser and curiouser!"
In "The Great American Stickup" Robert Scheer has clearly laid out the connections that run from Ronald Reagan through the Gramms and on to Enron; from Robert Rubin at Treasury to Citigroup; from Citigroup back to Enron and on to the subprime loan craze. He traces the evolution of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac from government-sponsored creations to privately owned, and publicly traded, financial monsters. Scheer writes incisively about the incestuous world of finance and government where Goldman Sachs is nicknamed Government Sachs. He connects Hank Paulson and Goldman to AIG and Timothy Geithner to President Obama and back to AIG.
The saddest connection of all may turn out to be the one that runs from candidate Obama to President Obama. Early in the book Scheer quotes Obama's important speech at Cooper Union where the candidate astutely observed, "The American experiment has worked in large part because we have guided the market's invisible hand with a higher principle. Our free market was never meant to be a free license to take whatever you can get, however you can get it."
But that speech, with its clear recognition of the wisdom of Franklin Roosevelt's New Deal, stands in stark contrast to the policies of President Obama and leads me to one last quote from Alice (or, as I would like to imagine, from President Obama himself): "I wonder if I've been changed in the night? Let me think. Was I the same when I got up this morning? I almost think I can remember feeling a little different. But if I'm not the same, the next question is 'Who in the world am I?' Ah, that's the great puzzle!"
Buy this book, read it, and discuss it with friends and neighbors over a pot of tea, or if you prefer, a pot of coffee.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No