13 of 15 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
Not great, just good, October 7, 2000
I don't think that this book's satire is its strongest suit. Sure, Mr. Self manages to poke fun at humanity's romantic notions of love, relationship, and affection, by pointing a giant ape-sized mirror up to us. But that is really just a minor part of the book. He's really involved in a drawn out discussion of semiotics. By giving his ape-society an entirely different form of communication (signing), he's able to call attention to the way that we communicate with each other. Okay, I've said my piece.
The descriptions and displays of the ape society are nearly perfect. The constant grooming, "arse-kissing" (literally; it's a display of respect), physical recriminations, and especially the wall-to-wall copulating ("mating") are jarring at first, but eventually become routine for the reader. If there's any satire here, it's in Self trying to elicit a horrified response from his more prudish readers. I found the rules and regulations of his ape society fascinating and very well drawn.
I also enjoyed the fact that he took human cultural items (O.J. Simpson, HIV/AIDS, The Planet of the Apes movies) and hypostatized them, as they would appear in the ape world. He also had much fun substituting human for chimp/ape and chimp/ape for human whenever he could ("chimpanity", going "human sh*t", etc.)
My complaints about the novel are thus:
The secondary plot, in which several ape underlings conspire to form an alliance against Dr. Busner, felt tacked on. It never went anywhere, and hardly affected the plot. The one revelation that it provided had literally no dramatic effect at all. Pity, because it could have provided a much-needed narrative shake-up, to move the story along.
His characters all talk as if they are the offspring of Umberto Eco and Sigmund Freud. Everyone appears extremely well versed in the teachings of semiotics and clinical psychology. Even Simon (simian?) Dykes, the schizoid human-turned-ape, showed vast amounts of knowledge, so much so that I wondered why he didn't just up and cure himself! It became mighty frustrating, especially for the layman with only a cursory understanding of each, and a desire to read dialogue that doesn't sound like it's being copied from a textbook. Maybe that was that point? If it was, then it wasn't made clearly enough.
Self's prose -- the non-clinical portions -- was very inconsistent. At first, it felt very verbose, as if the author was paid per fifty-cent word. And at times it felt almost taciturn, preferring to make his points through the grunts that peppered the apes signing. I preferred the instances of the latter, purely for the fact that they contributed more to setting up his ape society, to the former, which only confused my sweet, little brain.
Overall, I enjoyed the novel for the alternate society it portrayed, and was more than a bit annoyed that it never really used it to say anything of interest.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
10 of 12 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
clever and entertaining, December 19, 2002
My wife bought this book for me because she liked the cover. I like it too, and think it looks rather like a simian Duane Gish (of the Institute for Creation Research)--do a Google image search and you'll see what I mean.
I don't think, as one reviewer wrote here, that the Zack Busner character is particularly based on Freud. There is evidence early on that he is at least partially based on Oliver Sacks (his list of publications in the world of chimps has titles very much like those of Sacks' books, and his intimate relationships with his patients are similar to Sacks' style).
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No