Customer Reviews

The Great Crash of 1929

5 star:		(51)
4 star:		(19)
3 star:		(11)
2 star:		(5)
1 star:		(7)

 

 

Recall the talk before the bust of the "New Economy," in which distended P/E ratios and lack of profits were to be irrelevant. Recall Enron's public proclamations of its stability and projected earnings increases. Keep these in mind as you read The Great Crash, and you will be very, very skeptical of analysts, to say nothing of executives.

Galbraith's theme is that market stability and corporate interests are fundamentally at odds. After pumping up prices by gambling with borrowed money, the financiers and executives simply hope to cash in and make it out alive. In the ensuing crisis, CEOs will never speak evil about their own companies or the condition of the market, so their speech is about as useful to an investor as a pre-game pep talk is to a bettor. Analysts, as well as executives, are salesmen of their own stock, and their primary objective is to get you to buy high.

Galbraith is a talented storyteller, and he highlights themes that are likely to accompany future bubbles so that the reader knows what to be skeptical about. This is a very entertaining read, and if you actively compare what Galbraith tells you of the 20's to what you know about the 90's, you'll likely not be swept away by future investing mania.

* * *

2008 Update:

Having learned a thing or two since I wrote that, I can think of no book better suited to explain our current predicament to the layman. Excessive leverage, housing bubble, financial deregulation, and crony capitalism -- sound familiar? You'll read about this stuff happening back in the '20s and shake your head in disbelief.

Economics, like physics, has a fundamental canon: you cannot make money out of nothing. To narrate the history of financial bubbles is to chronicle those times when people overlooked that fact. In those instances, asset prices soar merely to be resold for profit, with little regard as to their actual value; when something shakes confidence and buyers are in short supply, a crash follows as prices were sustainable only insofar as they could be resold higher.

According to John Galbraith, the stock-market crash that took place in the fall of 1929 was typical of this prototype. Mr. Galbraith, a Harvard economist, traced the optimism to the Florida real-estate bubble of 1925 which made people forget the elementary rules of money making. What follows is an elegant narrative that interweaves economics with history to produce one of the most telling and lucid accounts of the developments, economic and otherwise, that lead up to the October 1929 crash.

The crash, according to Mr. Galbraith, was caused by an admixture of bad income distribution (economy too dependent on luxury spending and investment), bad corporate structure, bad banking structure, foreign imbalances, and bad economic intelligence. In seeking compelling explanations, the "Great Crash" often resists conventional wisdom: for example, to those who blame the abundance of credit, Mr. Galbraith answers: "on numerous occasions before and since credit has been easy, and there has been no speculation whatever." Mr. Galbraith looks beyond central banking and interest rates to compile a rich and diverse history of the 1929 crash.

So what about preventing future crises? Here, Mr. Galbraith is ambivalent. Regulation has and can play a substantial role in preventing future troubles. But the problem lies elsewhere: people continue to believe that they have been blessed, and that they can make money with little or no effort. When wise men see such folly and decide to partake in it rather than spoil it, a bubble that later crashes is inevitable. For all those who seek an economic solution to this economic problem, Mr. Galbraith surely disappoints. The surest protection against over-speculation, he writes, is to remind people that you can never get something from nothing. Those in love with central banking might find the idea simplistic, yet its beauty lies with its simplicity.

Having just lived through the crash of the dot-com stocks, I thought it was a particularly appropriate moment to reread John Kenneth Galbraith's famous history of the stock market crash of 1929 in the United States. Professor Galbraith's final words prove to be prophetic as he suggests that as soon as the lessons of 1929 are forgotten, the speculative excesses that led to that debacle will recur. I am sure that when the dot-bomb experience is forgotten, it will be repeated with some new class of speculation in some future generation.

With the recent experience of seeing a market mania, I came away more impressed with this book than before. Professor Galbraith does a fine job of capturing the psychology that builds into and sustains a mania. He also writes like a novelist rather than like an economist. That talent makes the message easy to grasp and appreciate.

I was also impressed by how our popular perceptions of 1929 are so often wrong. For example, most people believe that many "broken" speculators committed suicide. Although some did, there was no significant rise in the suicide rate compared to a general trend in that direction.

Economists often like to fault the Federal Reserve for the crash. That blame seems somewhat misplaced when you learn that there was very little government debt that the Fed could repurchase to create liquidity. Had the Fed acted differently, the crash might have come a little sooner and not been quite so severe . . . but the fundamentals would probably not have changed too much.

Another misperception is that everyone was speculating. By even the most generous measures, the speculators probably never numbered over a million people.

Although this is a history, Professor Galbraith takes on the economic question of how the crash contributed to the Depression. Although we know very little about the economic details of 1929, I was impressed by the point about how much consumer spending was concentrated in the wealthiest people. As they lost vast sums, both spending for consumer goods and savings for capital were decimated. With the broader income distribution of today, such a cataclysm would not be so harmful (as we saw in the aftermath of the dot-com crash).

There is an excellent parallel discussion of the land boom in Florida earlier in the 1920's that is very rewarding. I was intrigued by the ways that ever increasing ways of extending leverage were created so that both bubbles could climb higher. In Florida, people didn't actually buy the land. They bought options to buy the land, and traded those. In the stock market, holding companies sold stock and then floated new holding companies. These were capitalized with common stock, preferred and debt so that all of the appreciation would accrue to the common holders. Naturally, the opposite occurred on the way down. Many stocks fell by over 99 percent, as a result.

Everyone who is tempted to buy any item primarily because it is thought to represent an opportunity for a quick buck should read this book.

Look for true value in all that you do!

John Kenneth Galbraith's slender book is an easy-to-read chronicle of the events leading up to and following the crash of `29. Galbraith was a Harvard economist in 1954 when he published "The Great Crash 1929", just 25 years after the event occurred. He relied heavily on newspaper accounts and congressional testimony for his research. As a result, the book lacks a first-hand perspective that could have been achieved by interviewing the participants in the fiasco, many of whom were surely still living when Galbraith conducted his work.

That said, "The Great Crash 1929" is worthwhile reading. It's natural to compare the causes of the 1929 crash with the events that led up to the market correction in 2000-2002. Although Wall St. and the financial infrastructure have come a long ways since the late `20s, Galbraith notes that human nature cannot change and "inaction will be advocated in the present even though it means deep trouble in the future." Those words will resonate for anyone still licking his wounds from the implosion of the late-90s dot-com mania.

Given the recent turmoil in world financial markets, it is hardly surprising that, from the rubble, an army of economic pundits has arisen, replete with historical parallels and a cookbook of remedies for the mess. Being of a cynical disposition, I favor those pundits who reinforce my own certainties that perfidy, greed, speculation, lack of regulatory oversight and failed government policies are at fault for the current debacle. I found validation in "The Great Crash, 1929".

John Kenneth Galbraith, is a "giant" in the field. In this book, he identified five salient weaknesses of the 1920s economy that appear to me to be strangely evocative of the current financial crises. These are: 1). Gross inequalities in income distribution, with a tiny fraction of the
population owning the vast majority of the wealth. The level of CEO compensation nicely illustrates this point (it's nearly 350 times that of the average "prole"), 2). Flawed corporate structure, one in which, "American enterprise in the twenties had opened its hospitable arms to an exceptional number of promoters, grafters, swindlers, impostors and frauds". The analogy to the present is perhaps to hedge fund managers, short-sellers, leveraged traders, purveyors of derivatives and "sub-prime" mortgages and real estate speculators, some of whom appear to share these characteristics, 3). Bad banking structure, enabled, in part, by Congress rescinding Depression-era legislation separating commercial from investment banks and by allowing unregulated investment activity on a large scale. Other components extend to failure of the SEC to regulate mortgage instruments, "naked" short selling, government-mandated requirements for the use of "fair value accounting". I'm sure there are others., 4). "Dubious" state of foreign balance. Now (in a reverse of the situation in the 1920s), the US is the chief borrower nation, with the preponderance of debt held by foreign governments (chiefly Asian and increasingly Middle Eastern) and, 5). The poor state of economic intelligence. In the present crisis, I take "intelligence" to mean "smarts", rather than access to accurate and timely data. It might also be taken to mean "responsibility". An example of lack of "smarts" might be E. Stan O'Neal of Merrill Lynch who blandly asserted his lack of understanding of "derivatives" as an excuse for his firm's demise, while allowing their purchase and sale. Dick Fuld of Lehman is a nice illustration of lack of responsibility. His activities destroyed a perfectly goodfirm, yet, he still serves as Lehman CEO (note: the current Lehman is a 14 year-old company, spun off from American Express, so don't wax too nostalgic about the demise of a "150 year-old firm").

Yes, it seems obvious that regulation will be required as, left to their own devices, the "masters of the universe" will continue to refine and evolve their penchant for making lots of money by devising new financial instruments, which will lie outside the latest regulatory umbrella. Yes, people will live beyond their means, if given the option and easy credit is an enabler. This all seems to be part of human nature. Yes, it's a mess. However, it is unlikely to be "a national disaster for the United States". It's just business. However, you never know...

You want to know how irrational and unpredictable the stock market can be? Read this book. Written in easy-to-read language, it is digested almost as easily as a mystery novel, and yet provides a deep insight into the dramatic events of 1929, and gives an invaluable historic lesson. You can clearly see the parallels between events preceding market collapse in 1929 and today high-tech stock market boom - "...there is here a basic and recurrent process. It comes with rising prices, whether of stocks, real estate, works of art or anything else. This increase attracts attention and buyers, which produces the further effect of even higher prices. Expectations are thus justified by the very action that sends prices up. The process continues; optimism with its market effect is the order of the day. Prices go up even more. Then, for reasons that will endlessly be debated, comes the end. The descent is always more sudden than the increase; a balloon that has been punctured does not deflate in an orderly way." Book goes on to describe the inaction of the Federal Reserve, trade on margin, mergers, Florida real estate boom, investment trusts, leverage, short selling, and so on. Yet, you do not need to be a financial whiz to understand it. This is definitely a 5-star book.

Well-written chronicle of the 1929 Wall Street crash; and the key figures and investments that contributed to the market's collapse. JKG's laconic humor makes the book a delightful read.

A negative is that the Kindle version is very poorly copyedited. The electronic version is rife with misspellings, missing words, and other copy errors. Buy the print copy.

I wasn't sure whether to give this 3 or 4 stars (I would have preferred 3.5), so I rounded down. Sorry.

As for the book, itself, this is a light, quick and even entertaining take on the market mania that caused the 1929 crash. While the book doesn't go into great detail, it does provide some good insights into both the crowd psychology that always produces crashes as well as the objects of their desire.

The investment trusts which were bid up so ridiculously in the late 20's bear just a bit more than an eerie resemblance to the tech stocks of the late 90's, the subprime paper of present day, the M&A mania that recently burst, the housing market, ethanol, sovereign wealth funds and... well just about everything on CNBC these days. More seriously, the similarities between than and now are quite extensive, and one can learn a valuable lesson from the largest calamity in U.S. financial history.

I do wish that the book would have gone more into all of the reasons behind not only the crash but also the Great Depression. While the 2 are intertwined, this book only offers insight into the stock market and, sadly, leaves the entire story untold.

I'm a junior in high school doing a research paper on the stock market crash of 1929. Without reading this book I would be left in the dark. Reading 6 other books, Galbraith is the only author who writes in a language that is easily understandable to someone who does not know how to calculate a beta ranking for a stock.

First published in 1954, this book is understandably piquing interest because of the current financial issues facing the United States and world. The causes of the 1929 crash do seem similar in many ways to the current issues of today in 2008. However, many circumstances are similar, as many are different.

But also similar, there seems to be a rule about the phenomenon of Karma in individual human behavior. And this rule of Karma seems to apply to investing behavior.

Author John Galbraith provides evidence for his argument that cheap and easy credit wasn't the major reason for the bubble-like conditions that led to the crash, but that the real factor was "speculation for the sake of speculating." Speculation for the sake of speculation caused prices to artificially rise to extremely high levels simply because investors were buying with the intent to sell for a profit ---> and the next buyer would do the same, and so on.

During the 1920s many conditions inside and outside of the US financial markets provided a sense of false prosperity which was actually based on greed and speculation for the pure sake of speculation. These strong aspects of human mind and behavior that propel steep rising bubbles and steep downward slides. It's interesting how human psychology plays such a large role when markets rise in bubbles and then sharply decline. Mania involves greed on the way up, and fear on the way down.

From this 50+ year-old book (with an update in the late 1990s), a reader will immediately realize some of the parallels of 1929 that exist in 2008: This does not mean the same results will happen, however. But they could happen....

Gailbrath notes the significant inequality in income distribution that existed in 1929, deregulation of the banking industry, poor leadership, and bad policy and decision-making by the government because of economic ignorance and myopia. This ignorance is referred to by the author as a lack of "economic intelligence." Today, look at the current cast of characters in their *appointed* economic-power positions, and the criticism they're receiving for not only what they did *not* do, but what they *did* do once the financial downward spiral started unraveling.

As a historian, the author also noted another concept from then that reminds us of current times: the Florida real-estate bubble of the 1920s. In addition to buying land, people could by the "option to buy land" on a piece of paper. They could then re-sell it, where the option would be re-sold and re-sold again, and so on, and so on. Again, speculation for the sake of speculation. These buy-options and other means, were creative financing, and over-extended lending, and excessive leveraging. Just like today, and just like then, the result was a hard fall.

Housing bubbles have happened before. A disturbing concept of until recently was people treating their owner-occupied home - the home a person lives in - as an speculative investment and ATM machine during the big leaps in equity increases. Conditions caused by human "bubble-behavior" on the way up, at the peak, and on the way down.

John K. Galbraith noted over 50 years ago in this book that "money doesn't grow on trees." Nor does money grow on Collateralized Debt Obligations (CDOs) that are fraudulently rated AAA when they are not, and then sold to the world. Credit Default Swaps, Helocs, ARMs, teaser rates, and NINJA. Money cannot be invented out of nothing. Call it Karma, physics, or the fundamental concepts of investing. Making money out of thin air can only last a short time, with negative consequences often the result. The author stated that as time passes and the seismic crash of '29 fades from memory only to be highlighted as a side-note in history books: that rampant speculation, greed, and bubbles will happen again, followed by an inevitable bust.

"Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it."
~ George Santayana, The Life of Reason, Volume 1, 1905

As a layman who consistently attempts to self-educate myself about economic events, I do see a similar, yet also very different type of crash happening today as in 1929. Currently I see it as a steady decline. A slow and steady decline, that will be long-term and bring a lower standard of living. People will to have change their focus about what is important in life, if they'll be able to cope with the new economic circumstances and world that we'll be living in.

This is a well-written and good historical book by Kenneth Galbraith.