| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Publishers Weekly, 7/26/10
“Dando-Collins vividly recreates one of history’s most famous events…Dando-Collins energetically recreates the days leading up to the fire, the conflagration itself, and the subsequent decline of Nero’s fortunes.”
WTVF (CBS, Nashville), 9/7/10
“Did Nero really set fire to Rome in 64AD? More than just a convenient slam against a failed emperor, this book solves the historical puzzle and is interesting reading.”
Product Details
Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
|
|
Share your thoughts with other customers:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
8 of 11 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Interesting reading behind the Great Fire of Rome,
By lordhoot "lordhoot" (Anchorage, Alaska USA) - See all my reviews
This review is from: The Great Fire of Rome: The Fall of the Emperor Nero and His City (Hardcover)
This book reflects on the how the Great Fire of Rome in 64 AD led to the fall of Emperor Nero four years later. Much of the book is filled with background material prior to the fire. However, from the author's point of view, it did appears that Nero initially tried to fight the fires although later on, he took advantages of what the end result of the fire provided him. Interestingly, the book didn't write much about the Christians being tormented as we see in some Hollywood movies. Perhaps the author realized (as many of us already knew) that there wasn't enough Christians in Rome during that time to create a scapegoat complex. So Nero went after the followers of Egyptian Goddess Iris who were more numerous in number. Nero seek a scapegoat because the growing rumours even back then, that he had a hand in the fire. Despite of Nero's best efforts, this wasn't going away so he needed a fall guy to take the blame. The book covered the fact that even afterward, many Roman historians still blame Nero for the fire. Whether this was a calculated effort at misinformation, it hard to tell. The book does say that most of Nero's contemporary historians does NOT blame Nero for the fire. But the negative press that Nero suffered from the fire during his life time, plus his frivolous lifestyle and his murderous tendencies, led to his downfall which was universally hailed in great rejoicing. The book does a very good job in describing all that in a very readable material. The author does take certain "liberties" with drama within the historical context but overall, I found the book highly entertaining and somewhat educational.
1 of 2 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Lots of detail,
Amazon Verified Purchase(What's this?)
This review is from: The Great Fire of Rome: The Fall of the Emperor Nero and His City (Hardcover)
Stephen Collins does it again. Another great book from his line. Lots of detail and keeps you wanting more.
6 of 10 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars
Poor History,
By
This review is from: The Great Fire of Rome: The Fall of the Emperor Nero and His City (Hardcover)
This book makes for interesting reading, but again Dando-Collins succumbs to wild speculation. He has done this before, with "The Blood of The Caesars", in which he dramatically determines that Germanicus Caesar was murdered by Seneca! Also, that Germanicus's wife was involved in the plot, engaging in an affair with Seneca. Roman history is interesting itself, without needing to make it into a soap opera. It is very likely that Germanicus was murdered by Tiberius, who needless to say felt threatened by Germanicus's tremendous popularity with the Roman people.The claim of this new book is almost as laughable, that Nero pinned the burning of Rome not on the Christians, but on followers of the Isis cult. It is possible that medieval monks inserted the passage relating to Christians, but there is not conclusive proof. The preponderance of the evidence leads a reasonable person to conclude that the passage is as Tacitus wrote it. Dando -Collins claims that there would have been very few Christians living in Rome in 64 AD. But we can tell from the New Testament that the Christian community at Rome had to been of some significance. Of all of the Letters that are historically ascribed to St. Paul, the longest one is the letter to the Romans! Would Paul have written his longest epistle to a small and insignificant community! Not likely. In summary, good history must stick to likely conclusions drawn from the preponderance of the evidence, not make wild unsubstantiated claims. This book is not good history.
Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
|
|
Tags Customers Associate with This Product(What's this?)Click on a tag to find related items, discussions, and people.
|
|
This product's forum
Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
|
Related forums
|