$2.18 + $2.98 shipping
In Stock. Sold by jaylennon

or
Sign in to turn on 1-Click ordering.
More Buying Choices
vidwatcher Add to Cart
$3.00 + $2.98 shipping
worldofbarg... Add to Cart
$6.29  & eligible for FREE Super Saver Shipping on orders over $25. Details
rememberus2 Add to Cart
$5.95 + $2.98 shipping
Have one to sell? Sell yours here
Great Kings of England: Richard the Lionheart [VHS]
 
 

Great Kings of England: Richard the Lionheart [VHS]

 NR |  VHS Tape
3.3 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (3 customer reviews)

List Price: $19.95
Price: $2.18
You Save: $17.77 (89%)
o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o
In Stock.
Ships from and sold by jaylennon.
Only 1 left in stock--order soon.

Product Details

  • Format: Color, NTSC
  • Rated: NR (Not Rated)
  • Number of tapes: 1
  • Studio: Kultur Video
  • VHS Release Date: September 26, 2000
  • Run Time: 50 minutes
  • Average Customer Review: 3.3 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (3 customer reviews)
  • ASIN: B00004ZEQP
  • Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #498,915 in Movies & TV (See Top 100 in Movies & TV)

Editorial Reviews

The reign of Richard the Lionheart was one of the most eventful in English history. Richard devoted his life to crusading and defending his lands in France. Only five months of his ten year reign were spent in England.

Tags Customers Associate with This Product

 (What's this?)
Click on a tag to find related items, discussions, and people.
 

Your tags: Add your first tag
 

Customer Reviews

5 star
0
2 star
0
1 star
0
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
2 of 2 people found the following review helpful
Format:VHS Tape
Few kings down through history were great warriors, a trait that makes Richard the Lionheart a worthy object of study. He personally led his troops into combat, even if you make allowances for natural exaggeration, it is clear that he killed a large number of enemy soldiers by his own hand. Very popular with his subjects, Richard spent very little time in England; generally he was off fighting to maintain his holdings in Normandy or on a crusade to reclaim the Holy Land from the Muslim forces.
This tape is similar to the other ones by Kultur in that the action scenes are poorly done, especially those depicting battles. Most of the comments about King Richard by historical figures are given via dramatic reading and these performances are much better. Despite these shortcomings, the historical aspects of the tape are quite good, explaining the life of Richard and his role in the development of England. As the narrator so aptly points out, Richard was the first king of Norman extraction after the successful Norman invasion of England that the English people accepted.
A solid selection for viewing in classes covering the history of England or the crusades, this tape has its' faults, but none of them are in the area of the actual history of his reign.
Was this review helpful to you?
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful
Format:VHS Tape|Amazon Verified Purchase
I bought this 1994 VHS biogaphy of King Richard I (the Lionheart) of England on a whim, since it was under $2.00. I'm certainly glad I didn't spend much more! I suggest you think of it as a knock-off of what you might see on the History Channel.

It was reasonably well written, all things considered. The acting was a touch hammy and over the top, but not completely unbearable. The titles and visual effects were definitely low budget, though; I think the same folks who did the Daleks from Doctor Who may have worked on this video. The ultimate in cheesiness had to be the grossly inaccurate armorial display on King Richard's surcoat.

Now, there is some historical debate as to precisely what arms Richard bore, and when. Basically, Richard wore either Lions Passant, or Lion(s) Rampant (i.e., lions depicted either running low to the ground, or standing reared up, and facing one side). But this video struck out by putting the following on the front of Richard's surcoat: three lions rampant, each rotated 90 degrees to the left, and facing downward, in a really poor imitation of Lions Passant. To a heraldry buff, this is an unforgivable error...maybe like flying Old Glory upside down on the Fourth of July, in a parade of full of veterans.

I recommend this video if you are a medieval history buff looking for some good laughs. Everyone else, save your money, stick to the History Channel, A&E, etc. Or go buy/rent "The Crusades", the 1935 Cecil B. DeMille movie, starring Loretta Young and Henry Wilcoxon. It's pure 1930's Hollywood; but at least you won't be wasting your money.
Was this review helpful to you?
2 of 3 people found the following review helpful
Format:DVD
This documentary is filled with modern Brits dressing and acting as medieval people, so this will remind you of "Monty Python's Holy Grail." The work mentions Sherwood Forest, King John, and a returning king, so it may also remind you of the many version of Robin Hood.

I was pleased to learn about Richard the Lion-Hearted. I'm a bit surprised that medieval British people knew about lions, but perhaps they learned about them through the Romans and their past coliseum games. Unlike other documentaries where the homosexuality of celebrated, historical figures is denied, this work was bold enough to mention that Richard liked males. However, the narrator states that he was handsome, yet the actor portraying him has Steve Buscemi-like qualities. The Europeans and the Arabs didn't just fight each other in the Crusades; the kings of the warring groups knew and had contact with each other. This may make people think too much about "300" and other current schisms between the West and the Middle East. Be careful as a viewer.

Old James Bond movies didn't have realistic car chases. They had characters pretend to drive as a screen of a busy highway plays in the background. This used the same cheap trick. The documentary makers did not take the actors to the desert; they just show a screen with a desert background. They have one actor who actually looked like he was of Arab descent. However, for the Saladdin the king, they put heavy brown makeup and fake facial hair on an actor. This type of "brownface" seemed too much like the racist "blackface" used in the 1800s in the United States. I am sure Britain has many talented, Arab actors who could have played the role. The use of this racial drag is offensive, and possibly racist. Further, the actor uses an accent that sounded more French than Arabic. The narrator, in addition, had poor French pronunciation skills.
Comment | 
Was this review helpful to you?
Search Customer Reviews
Only search this product's reviews

Customer Discussions

This product's forum
Discussion Replies Latest Post
No discussions yet

Ask questions, Share opinions, Gain insight
Start a new discussion
Topic:
First post:
Prompts for sign-in
 


Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
Search all Amazon discussions
   
Related forums



Look for Similar Items by Category


Look for Similar Items by Subject

Search Movies & TV by subject:




i.e., each product must be in subject 1 AND subject 2 AND ...
jaylennon Privacy Statement jaylennon Shipping Information jaylennon Returns & Exchanges