Most Helpful Customer Reviews
|
|
9 of 10 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars
Bitter, hypocritical, and misinformed, September 16, 2002
On the first page of the book you hit the statement that Jackie was "the laziest man alive." For me, that statement sets the tone. A quick look at the picture of the author will show he doesn't know much about excercise himself. I found it laughable that one of the big gripes William makes about Gleason was he proported musical talent was his that belonged to others, when whole paragraphs from the previous two biographies mysteriously found themselves into this book, word for word at times. Whereas the first two books were written by friends of Jackie's, William never had even a personal conversation with him, and spoke to NONE of the family. While he did speak to coworkers, I got the feeling from the beginning that he had set out to write a "Jackie is a smuck" book, and filtered everything accordingly. Within the first few chapters, I lost count of the number of factual errors that I found. Mae's mother had 11 children, not 5. They never actually lived in Ireland. Jackie's darkness didn't come from some ancestral Spainard sunk of the coast of Ireland, but from a maternal Great-Grandfather from Portugal. Herb, the father, was not a decade older than his wife, but three years. These were all easily researched items and were wrong. This cast a long shadow of suspicion over the rest of the book which consists of people's accounts of things long past. We all know how memories can be. The bookcover said the author treated shortcomings with compassion, but I found it closer to intense condemnation, such as with the statement, "the laziest man alive" because Jackie didn't walk 12 blocks in New York. Have to wonder if the author would have hoofed it, or hailed a cab. There may be some facts buried in the pile of misinformation and bad feeling, but it may be hard to find, or to identify. For me, I see Jackie's ever changing stories as a way for him to keep the truth private and just for himself. I certainly hope no one out there really believes that Tom Cruise is telling us the truth about his life, or Julia Roberts. Just because they do something, doesn't mean we deserve the intimate details of theirs lives. And just because Jackie wasn't upfront about his, doesn't change that mystical magic that happens when people watch the Honeymooners. He wasn't perfect, few of us are, but he gave us smiles we didn't have before. His life was sad and hard, but to be so spiteful and mean about it makes William's life even sadder. Imagine implying Jackie shouldn't feel upset because his mother died when he was a "man of nineteen" instead of boy of sixteen. I can't imagine having lost both parents by nineteen and to only have one cousin at my wedding for family. This book will only give you what you want if you already know that it has been written by someone who looked for the bad and down played the good, or quite possibly, simply didn't include those accounts. The book wasn't that interesting, and I certainly could put it down. It left a very bad taste in my mouth.
|
|
|
3 of 3 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars
Loaded with facts and yet..., July 19, 2000
...I had a hard time liking this book for anything other than trivia nuggets. The author seems to endlessly delight in pointing out errors or outright lies in any and all Gleason anecdotes. He also makes sure to include every unflattering thing anyone ever said about Gleason, with very few kind things to balance them out. While I enjoyed learning new things about Jackie Gleason, I finished this book with an overall feeling that the author not only disliked him, but is almost jealous of Gleason's success, and tries to compensate for this by portraying Gleason as negatively as possible.
|
|
|
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars
Negative author, September 10, 2009
In all my years of reading biographies I have never read a more terminal interpertation of another human being. One who mananged to bring himself up to major success with a abundance of close friends and colleagues. It seemed the author searched high and low looking for anything negative he could represent about one the greatest entertainers who lived and mananged to bring joy into the lives of so many of the public. I am sure he had faults but to portray each and everyone of them was neither entertaining or necessary in telling the story of this flamboyant man. We all make choices as we go through life, the ones who hang on the wall paper and try not to make waves and the wave makers that allow themselves to be put up for critism but take the world by the horns. I chose to be the later and I appreciate all others who do as well. This author has repeatley called Mr. Gleason "fat". That is obviously no surprise to any of us. However those who live in glass houses shouldn't throw rocks, perhpas Mr. Author take a better look at yourself according to your book jacket your no bargain!! It seems to me your own personal issues with charactors of this such came through. I suggest you seek therapy and don't write anymore!
|
|
|
Most Recent Customer Reviews
|