Customer Reviews


6 Reviews
5 star:
 (1)
4 star:
 (2)
3 star:    (0)
2 star:
 (1)
1 star:
 (2)
 
 
 
 
 
Average Customer Review
Share your thoughts with other customers
Create your own review
 
 
Only search this product's reviews

The most helpful favorable review
The most helpful critical review


12 of 14 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars New sound for this 1920s supergroup
The consistently best sound on 1920s-1930s jazz reissues is the Decca Jazz label. I find no King Oliver CDs appear under this label, though. Robert Parker achieves remarkable, though arguable, sonic results with his "Digital Stereo" on this 2CD set. The higher frequencies have not been amputated with low-pass filters (as is the case with the French RCA...
Published on December 24, 1999

versus
4 of 5 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars Sound suffers from overprocessing
Great music-- hey, it's Oliver! But the acoustic recordings have an unnatural bass boost. I hear the rumbly surface of the records more than the music. The noise reduction seems to cut in and out, and is rather distracting. The biggest problem I have with this reissue is the addition of artificial reverb --- not touch, but a LOT. It junks up the sound of these classic...
Published on January 27, 2006 by Warren Steele


Most Helpful First | Newest First

12 of 14 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars New sound for this 1920s supergroup, December 24, 1999
By A Customer
This review is from: Great Original Performances 1923-30 (Audio CD)
The consistently best sound on 1920s-1930s jazz reissues is the Decca Jazz label. I find no King Oliver CDs appear under this label, though. Robert Parker achieves remarkable, though arguable, sonic results with his "Digital Stereo" on this 2CD set. The higher frequencies have not been amputated with low-pass filters (as is the case with the French RCA reissue "King Oliver and his orchestra 1929-1930"). But the stereo effect seems mostly due to the addition of reverb, and the band sounds like it is playing in a large and empty concert hall, a dubious psychoacoustic achievement. The processing also introduces ear-chewing resonances in the upper register overtones of the horns. The Jazz Chronological Classics series has reissued his recordings, but based on the sound quality of one sample I have heard from that series, I would avoid them entirely. As to the music, this was one of the Jazz supergroups of the 1920s, and they continuously provide moving musical surprises from their magic hat of riffs, rhythms, solos, melodies, and musical realms.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


4 of 4 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars For those of us who are King Oliver cultists, October 23, 2003
By 
bukhtan (Chicago, Illinois, USA) - See all my reviews
This review is from: Great Original Performances 1923-30 (Audio CD)
"How horrible to have lived in the 20th century and never to have heard King Oliver", as the fine English poet Philip Larkin said, quoted in the excellent liner notes to the great Australian re-masterer Robert Parker's 2-CD collection of Kingoliveriana.
King Oliver fascinates jazz fans, I think, because he comes somewhere between Buddy Bolden, who never recorded and whose sound therefore can only be imagined (see the book "In search of Buddy Bolden" by Donald Marquis)and the stupendous youngster Louis Armstrong, whose genius is very nearly fully attested, and in fine sound, thanks to the Okeh label (and John R.T. Davies' superlative remastering of those 78's in his 4-CD set on the JSP label "Hot Fives and Hot Sevens"). King Oliver seems to have reached his artistic height sometime before he first recorded in Chicago in 1923. These first recordings are among the first of authentic African American jazz ensemble, with sound tolerable only to those of us who are accustomed to very old records. Unfortunately, as recording technology improved, Joe Oliver's chops wobbled, and his breath weakened. Was he really the King? Yes, and we have the sonic evidence to prove it. But it is proof by combination, conclusion, sympathy, and imagination.
Robert Parker does his usual job of finding the best preserved 78's, judicious use of noise reduction and other tricks, and addition of reverb to produce a surprising presence and oomph from archival recordings. The early tracks definitely outclass the sound of the Jazz Heritage and GRP (i.e. Decca) recordings I have. It's easy to imagine being a kid just arrived in Chicago from Nebraska or Mississippi, braving your way into a Rush Street or Bronzeville dive, and hearing and seeing these great musicians shaking the walls and cutting every cheap dance orchestra to shreds, and above the pack the magisterial presence of King Oliver.
My criticism of this package would be the inclusion, in the second disc, of some sides where Joe Oliver may not have played (at least one where he definitely did not) and some sides that are really nothing more than generic late New Orleans style stomps. I would, I say, criticise Parker's collection for this reason if I were not also a member of the King Oliver cult, who appreciates every piece of evidence which helps us to establish the nature of this great artist in his setting. How horrible that Joe Oliver's fall is so much better documented than his rise.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


4 of 4 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars Excellent Reissue of Classic Performances, December 6, 2001
By 
"wtb4" (walnut Creek, CA United States) - See all my reviews
This review is from: Great Original Performances 1923-30 (Audio CD)
Robert Parker's audio restoration of these great recordings is wonderful. Some may find the sound overly resonant or boomy, but I didn't have this problem with this CD and I find myself playing it often. This collection includes a selection of nine performances from Oliver's classic 1923 session with Louis Armstrong - some of the most famous performances in all of recorded jazz - and the remainder of the collection is from subsequent incarcations of King Oliver's band. There's a famous duet with Jelly Roll Morton, and a great many late 1920s recordings of Oliver's larger recording ensemble, which was obviously struggling to find its style at the dawn of the swing era. Sadly, Oliver's chops deteriorated over the last half of the decade, so his solos on these later records (which comprise the bulk of this 2-CD set) are not as commanding as his magisterial performances on the 1923 sessions. However, among these later recordings, there are many top-notch tracks, including more than a few classics (such as the famous "Wa Wa Wa" which features Oliver as his best). To the end, Oliver preserved his deep, rich tone, and there a sense of sad dignity which can be heard in all of his playing.

In summary: because this is King Oliver, and because it sounds so good, I give it 5 stars. But my first recommendation would be King Oliver: the Complete Set, which includes *all* of the 1923 session on 2 discs, also in excellent sound. That said, I wouldn't do without either of these reissues.

Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


4 of 5 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars Sound suffers from overprocessing, January 27, 2006
By 
This review is from: Great Original Performances 1923-30 (Audio CD)
Great music-- hey, it's Oliver! But the acoustic recordings have an unnatural bass boost. I hear the rumbly surface of the records more than the music. The noise reduction seems to cut in and out, and is rather distracting. The biggest problem I have with this reissue is the addition of artificial reverb --- not touch, but a LOT. It junks up the sound of these classic recordings. Throughout the '50s and '60s many reissues used reverb, in an attempt to "simulate stereo". I was glad when they finally stopped, and we got to hear natural transfers again. It is alarming to see the trend starting over!!

I wish reissue labels would leave this stuff alone, and let us hear what the artist actually played, instead of what they think it might have sounded like in a big, empty concert hall. There's a reason why serious collectors won't buy CDs with artificial reverb ---- they're artificial!
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


1 of 1 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars Bad sound is reason for 2 stars., March 16, 2005
By 
This review is from: Great Original Performances 1923-30 (Audio CD)
Music in this double cd is good, but no the best.

Best music which King Oliver ever recorded is on Complete set double Cd.

But this Cd is not good for me for other reason. This is poor sound quality.

For me this Cd is unlistanable for false sound reflection.

I prefer real sound on complete set and my recommendation is don't buy this Cd, buy Complete set.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


3 of 5 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars Yow! What's with the reverb????, February 27, 2006
This review is from: Great Original Performances 1923-30 (Audio CD)
Nothing else to say-- it doesn't matter how good the sound started out. Once it gets junked up with artificial echo, it is destroyed beyond salvation. Foul! Boo!! Hiss!!!
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


Most Helpful First | Newest First

This product

Great Original Performances 1923-30
Great Original Performances 1923-30 by King Oliver (Audio CD - 1998)
Used & New from: $4.49
Add to wishlist See buying options