Customer Reviews


60 Reviews
5 star:
 (35)
4 star:
 (1)
3 star:    (0)
2 star:
 (3)
1 star:
 (21)
 
 
 
 
 
Average Customer Review
Share your thoughts with other customers
Create your own review
 
 

The most helpful favorable review
The most helpful critical review


9 of 18 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars Yes, the Greatest Hoax!
The book is clear, comprehensive, and solidly scientific in its refutation of Dawkins' book. Sarfati is honest in presenting his presuppositions or framework for interpreting the objective evidence. This is to be applauded since the "fallacy of neutrality" is all to often committed by those who practice experimental science. When the belief systems are clearly...
Published 6 months ago by Shaun Hurrie

versus
86 of 146 people found the following review helpful
1.0 out of 5 stars Just because you have a PhD doesn't give you the right to ignore reality
This book was loaned to me by a religious friend who decided to see if I would be opened minded. Well, as a man of science, I am open to possibilities when the evidence is there to be peer reviewed. However, when I read the first few chapters I thought it was a joke. Elementary logical fallacies out the wazoo are present in this book. The author clearly does not...
Published on September 29, 2011 by Monk


‹ Previous | 1 26 | Next ›
Most Helpful First | Newest First

86 of 146 people found the following review helpful
1.0 out of 5 stars Just because you have a PhD doesn't give you the right to ignore reality, September 29, 2011
This review is from: The Greatest Hoax on Earth? Refuting Dawkins on Evolution (Paperback)
This book was loaned to me by a religious friend who decided to see if I would be opened minded. Well, as a man of science, I am open to possibilities when the evidence is there to be peer reviewed. However, when I read the first few chapters I thought it was a joke. Elementary logical fallacies out the wazoo are present in this book. The author clearly does not understand the theory of evolution or anything else for that matter, due in part to his faith in a supernatural, cosmic space daddy. Everything in the book is creationist propaganda used to appeal to massive amounts of ignorant religious people who don't care about simple things like the truth. The authors motives are quite clear, they want to discredit anything that conflicts with a literal interpretation of the bible.

CHAPTER 2, the author attempts to justify a worldwide flood with no evidence at all; also make no attempt to explain exactly where the water originated from to support his statement. The total water supply of the earth is roughly 326 million cubic miles. A cubic mile is defined as the volume of a cube with sides of 1 mile exactly. Due to the rotation of the earth, the earth has a bulge on the equator compared to the poles, so some tricky math is involved to calculate exactly how much water is required for this ridiculous statement. Genesis 7:19 outlines that a flood covered all of mountains, and Gen. 7:20 states that "Fifteen cubits upward did the waters prevail; and the mountains were covered.", so that means that water was 15 'cubits' above the tallest mountain. I won't add that figure into the math below, I'll just use Mt Everest's height instead. Everest is 29,028 feet in height (Google; Height of Everest). Someone commented on my review and stated that Everest wasn't at it's present height 6000 years ago, but no matter what I've read about Everest it's been there for eons. This is yet another sad attempt to fix the holes in the bible by people who take it literally.

Per the bible, and the amount of water required to rise to a height of 29,000 feet in 40 days is around 360 inches an hour. 348,336 inches of rain in 40 days. (362.85 * 24) * 40 = 348,336 inches. (The rainiest place on earth gets 200 inches a year, for comparison.)

In order to justify how much water this is, we will have to perform some pretty difficult math as the Earth isn't exactly even due to tidal bulge. The volume of a oblate sphere is v = 4/3 * pi * a^2b, where a is 6378.137 km and b is 6356.7523 km. (Google: Volume of a oblate sphere) The earth's total volume is about 1.08321x10^12 km^3 in scientific notion (Williams, 2004 "Earth Fact Sheet"). To express this in math terms, V = 4/3 * a^2 * b * pi where a/b are the 2 different sizes of the earth, A for the equator and B for the polar region. (Wikipedia: Geodesy , Volume of the Earth), So, V = 4/3 * 6378^2 * 6356 * pi and V = 4/3 * 6386^2 * 6365 * pi for the formula. We subtract the height of Everest from the Earth, using this: (Everest - Earth) = (1.08773 x 10^12 cubic kilometers) - (1.083032 × 10^12 cubic kilometers) = 4.7×10^9 cubic kilometers.

4.7×10^9 cubic kilometers is 1.13×10^9 cubic miles. There is approximately 1,101,117,150,000 gallons of water in 1 cubic mile, so therefor the flood of 'noah' would need to leave behind 1,244,262,379,500,000,000,000 GALLONS (which is roughly 1.2442623795×10^21, aka 1.2 sextillion gallons of water). The final estimate is roughly 3.6 × volume of Earth's oceans (1.3×10^9 km^3). To place this into perspective, the 'flood of noah' would have [more/just slightly less] gallons of water than grains of sand on the Earth; ie (0.0012 to 12) × the number of grains of sand on the earth (~~ 10^20 to 10^24). So my questions, Where in the world did the water 'come' from and 'go' ? That much 'water' would have dynamically altered the various gases and density in the atmosphere. Since adding another few miles of water, the atmosphere would be pushed outward into space, causing /massive/ changes in the atmosphere. There, is however, another problem. HEAT.

To flood the Earth, we use the previous estimate 4.7 x 10^9 km^3 of water with a mass of 4.525 x 10^21 kg. When this 'flood water' is floating on the surface of the earth, it's storing a gigantic amount of energy, which is transferred to kinetic energy when it's falling from the sky (Per Genesis 7:12 where that it rained for 40 days and 40 nights continuously); When this happens it's turned into heat due to friction, for example:

E=M*G*H, M/G/H being
M = Water Mass
G = Gravity constant
H = Height of water (using previously mentioned calculation)

The flood has to last 40 days and nights, the amount of mass falling to Earth, daily, is 4.525 x 10^21 kg/40 over 1 day (24 hours, 86400 seconds)

This equals to 1.1068 × 10^17 metric tons daily. Using H as 10 miles, the energy released each day is 1.73584 x 10^25 joules. The amount of energy the Earth would have to radiate per m^2/sec is energy divided by surface area of the Earth times number of seconds in one day (86400 seconds, which is seconds * minutes * hours). That is: E = 1.735384 x 10^25/(4*PI* ((6386)2*86,400)) = 391,935.0958 j/m^2/s.

Currently, the Earth radiates energy at the rate of approximately 215 joules/m2/sec (Per Modeling Earth's Climate System with STELLA, PSU) and the average temperature is 280 K.

E (increase)/E (normal) = T (increase)/T4 (normal)
E (normal) = 215 E (increase) = 391,935.0958 T (normal) = 280.

T = 1800 Kelvin. 1800 Kelvin which is 1526.85C, therefor completely destroying the surface of the planet/all life. Noah wasn't equipped with Star Trek transporters, or force fields, to stop the heat from setting fire to his archaic tugboat. Of course, if I wanted to make a bronze age story seem rational, I'd 'inject' things to make it work as well.

Someone commented on this review by stating that the water originated from 'Fountains of the deep' (Gen 7:11-12). The deepest borehole in the world, Kola Superdeep Borehole, was drilled down to 40,000 feet. At that depth, the temperature was 365F / 180C (Per "Legendary Kola Superdeep" (in Russian). (Journal of Science and Life). The temperature gradient overall is 1º C for every 30 meters, so realistically there is a 166º C increase in temperature / depth ("The Heart of the Earth, San Francisco: Freeman & Cooper, 1968, p. 138.") 166 + 25º C (average earth surface temperature at sea level) = 191º C (Morton 1995). Since the bible doesn't explain how much water in terms of depth/size/layer, I'll just use a 1km , since creation.com and other nonsense sites try and justify it by using either no numbers or vague numbers.
So, 1km of water deep underground, below the crust, it would contain roughly 2.399×10^8 cubic miles of water using previously mentioned calculation with height/depth. At 191ºC, the high temperature water would contain energy equivalent of 1.7×10^17 tons of TNT (Steam Tables, New York: Combustion Engineering Inc, 1940, p. 5.) , which is 1.8 times energy output of the sun in one second. 1.7×10^17 tons of TNT /2.399×10^8 = 708.60 megatons of TNT as energy for every cubic mile of water released from 'fountains of the deep'. 700 megatons of TNT would've clearly destroyed Noah and his little leaky boat. This is a rough estimate, but no matter how much of a mistake I make, the released energy is enough to vaporize the atmosphere.

Chapter 11 "Is the earth ancient" is absolutely absurd. Amino acid racemization, Baptistina Asteroid family, Continental drift, Cosmogenic nuclide dating, Erosion, Geomagnetic reversals, Impact craters, Iron-manganese nodules, Length of the prehistoric day, Naica megacrystals, Nitrogen in diamonds, Petrified wood, Relativistic jets, Sedimentary varves, Stalactites, Space weathering, Radiometric dating, annual ice layers, tree ring dating, etc, all point to an ancient earth. The author clearly has an electrical fire in his head, by suggesting all modern scientific dating methods are wrong, and his goofy faith is right. China and many older cultures have history of pottery and some written that are far older than his goofy doomsday cult.

Page 177 - Runaway subduction. This is the same 'theory' purposed by John Baumgardner, which he stated that would release 10^28 joules of energy, about as much as the kinetic energy of the Moon in its orbit around the Earth, which is estimated at 3.856×10^28 joules. That much energy release would've left behind something, such as freaking evidence! Why is it people like the author 'make up' stories to fix the bible's flaws?

Page 189, Dr Sarfati states something about accelerated nuclear decay of isotopes in the past (more or less). There is obviously a problem with this statement; THERE IS NO EVIDENCE TO THIS. The internal Earth's heat, 80% of it, comes from heat produced through radioactive decay (Turcotte, DL; Schubert, G (2002). "4". Geodynamics (2 ed.). Cambridge, England, UK: Cambridge University Press. pp. 136-7.), so if you cranked up the decay of isotopes, the internal heat of the mantle/core would rise by a factor of million (guesstimate), and would melt the crust of the earth, boil away the oceans, change the atmospheric gases, burn noah alive, etc. The Earth would look like a small sun! Clearly, the author doesn't care about explaining how the crust of the earth would state solid after being exposed sun-surface like temperatures from miles below, and increase in the atmospheric density, due to the simple fact that water vapor is mass, and Runaway greenhouse effect would cause Earth to become a Venus like planet with a super high atmospheric pressure. The Earth's upper atmosphere would have been contaminated with an enormous concentration of aerosols and solid particles (perhaps massive amounts of radioactive particles), rendering the atmosphere almost opaque due in part to the oceans boiling away. Why doesn't Sarfati explain this? Consider for the fact that there is simply ZERO evidence to support this nonsense, I guess people who voted 5 stars are ignorant of basic things like 8th grade science.

There are many other examples of dismal science in this book. It's clear to me that people like the author of this book want to perpetuate ancient bronze age nonsense as 21st century science. Speaking of dishonesty, the author's association with creation.com makes his 'position' clear. Under their 'About Us':

"(A) PRIORITIES: The scientific aspects of creation are important, but are secondary in importance to the proclamation of the Gospel of Jesus Christ as Sovereign, Creator, Redeemer and Judge." and "(D) GENERAL: By definition, no apparent, perceived or claimed evidence in any field, including history and chronology, can be valid if it contradicts the Scriptural record. Of primary importance is the fact that evidence is always subject to interpretation by fallible people who do not possess all information. "
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


109 of 187 people found the following review helpful
1.0 out of 5 stars A Polarized and Unscientific America, September 21, 2011
By 
Stephen Marley (Northern California) - See all my reviews
(REAL NAME)   
This review is from: The Greatest Hoax on Earth? Refuting Dawkins on Evolution (Paperback)
What a can an objective reader tell from the widely differing reviews of Jonathan Sarfati's "The Greatest Hoax on Earth - Refuting Dawkins on Evolution? Clearly, America is sharply divided about the validity of biological evolution and deeply troubled by its theological implications. Folks who give this book 5 stars are doing so because it reconfirms what they want to hear, albeit with Safarti's pseudoscientific spin. It helps to link young earth creationism into a general attack on atheism, and Richard Dawkins- the British biologist who also happens to be a controversial and widely published atheist.
This book provides comfort for a so-called Christian world view, mostly because readers will be predisposed to accept what Safarti claims "on faith".
Other reviewers, like me, will take Safarti to task for his steady stream of inaccuracies and reliance on "god can do anything he wants" explanations. To anyone who understands the scientific methodology (with many Christians, being among them) Safarti's writings seem disingenuous - clearly he has to carefully skirt around the evidence which undermines his credibility.
Safarti says, "despite claims by Dawkins and other evolutionists that "perfect missing links" have been discovered, the claims evaporate under careful analysis. However, Safarti avoids giving his readers a serious look at the morphological adaptations in countless transitional fossils. He simply "pooh pooh's" serious anatomical studies that have been going on for a century and a half. I actually challenged Jonathan Safarti to back up a few of his claims on these Amazon forums a few years ago and he deflected my simple questions about his interpretation of the "Cambrian Explosion." Although I won't buy his books and will only read them in bookstores, I'm very familiar with his writings and theological assumptions.
It is simply amazing, that in this day and age, those Americans who view the Bible as an infallible natural history - and they represent a slight majority, according to most polls - won't take the time to read a single "real" science books. They do not accept the findings that their nations colleges, finest universities, research hospitals, scientific organizations, biotechnology companies and museum curators teach and incorporate into their work, every single day. They never stop to contemplate, why would thousands of evolutionary biologists, paleontologists and geologists continue with this grand delusion, if it did not produce tangible results?
Is it really a vast "godless" conspiracy that involves the Smithsonian Institution, The National Science Foundation, The United States Geological Survey and millions of scientists, worldwide?
For too many fundamentalist Christians, their local pastor, a TV evangelist and a creationist author, like Safarti, provides all the information needed to convince themselves that the earth is just a few thousand years old and that dinosaurs and man once coexisted.
We are a polarized society and an increasingly unscientific America. This is a national tragedy with serious intellectual, economic and social consequences.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


9 of 18 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars Yes, the Greatest Hoax!, December 16, 2013
Verified Purchase(What's this?)
This review is from: The Greatest Hoax on Earth? Refuting Dawkins on Evolution (Paperback)
The book is clear, comprehensive, and solidly scientific in its refutation of Dawkins' book. Sarfati is honest in presenting his presuppositions or framework for interpreting the objective evidence. This is to be applauded since the "fallacy of neutrality" is all to often committed by those who practice experimental science. When the belief systems are clearly laid out on the table, we can more clearly see which framework provides a better fit for the evidence. In this case intelligent design within the Biblical framework clearly outguns non-intelligent chance within an atheistic framework.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


46 of 82 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars Scared about debate?, June 18, 2010
This review is from: The Greatest Hoax on Earth? Refuting Dawkins on Evolution (Paperback)
If we have open minds and are prepared to hear all sides then people on either side of the debate should read this book, let's have a level playing field for all. Ironically, it is the Christians who are accused of being closed-minded, yet for most evolution is the only theory they hear in their lives - don't we all have the right to make an informed decision? Hooray for this book.....
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


79 of 139 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars the greatest hoax on earth, June 6, 2010
This review is from: The Greatest Hoax on Earth? Refuting Dawkins on Evolution (Paperback)
"First of all, you must understand that in the last days scoffers will come, scoffing and following their own evil desires. They will say, "Where is this 'coming' he promised? Ever since our fathers died, everything goes on as it has since the beginning of creation (the fundamental evolutionary principle of uniformitarianism)." But they deliberately forget that long ago by God's word the heavens existed and the earth was formed out of water and by water. By these waters also the world of that time was deluged and destroyed. (2 Peter 3:3-6)

This verse, written in 1st century AD and written about this very time in our history, demonstrates why all the 1 star and 2 star ratings with their comments are here, and why someone like Dawkins who has no fundamental knowledge of Science is the darling of the atheistic world. Someone on her actually hailed Dawkins credentials ("one of the worlds great evolutionary biologists")and tried to denigrate Saftari by saying he only had a Phd in physical chemistry? It just goes to show the abject ignorance by those professing themselves to be wise. As someone with expertise in both disciplines, I can state categorically that Chemistry is a foundational science, and without it, there is no biology (or in dawkins case, zoology).

This author does an excellent job of refuting all of the points dawkins attempts to make. Should one read this book with a desire to understand where the scientific evidence truly does lead in this discussion, they will come away convinced that evolution is exactly what the title of this book states it is; the greatest hoax on earth. And Dawkins? Elmer Gantry of the atheist crowd, who, along with Eugenie Scott, NCSE, Nature, Discovery, NG, and the Smithsonians, and a number of other "evolutionary scientists" (and i use the term scientist here very loosely), are the evolutionary "high priests", worshiped by their followers, and leading the gullible, the deceived, and the "willfully ignorant" (as the Bible refers to them) to a place of complete science fantasy, and the absence of any scientific truth!

Keep leaving your 1 star and 2 star reviews, "scoffers". While your review have nothing to do with science literacy, with each stroke of your keyboards you do simply further validation of the God you don't believe in and His knowledge of exactly what you would be like, and why you do what you do.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


41 of 74 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars Actually read the book - It's spectacular!, June 18, 2010
This review is from: The Greatest Hoax on Earth? Refuting Dawkins on Evolution (Paperback)
Wonderful book! VERY well written and researched. Reveals the false arguments and presuppositions behind the evolution dogma. It won't let you down. Please don't be biased, give it a chance and actually READ it! Most of the negative reviews on here are from people who aren't taking the time to read it, which is extremely immature. This book is written by a brilliant man who really knows his stuff.
I'm very proud to have it on my bookshelf.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


99 of 175 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars An honest review by one who has really read the book, June 10, 2010
Verified Purchase(What's this?)
This review is from: The Greatest Hoax on Earth? Refuting Dawkins on Evolution (Paperback)
Sarfati refutes the suppositions of Dawkins, point-by-point. Evolution is not a proven fact and Sarfati points out that Dawkins even acknowledges that evolution does not have any plausible answer to many of what Dawkins calls "unsolved mysteries" such as what started life, what is the origin of sex, what is the origin of consciousness, where did morality come from. Sarfati shows scientific evidence that natural selection works by altering genes by removing information from the gene and that there is no evidence at all of genes mutating so as to add information to the genome. This itself scientifically establishes that the human race can't be very old, otherwise humans would have suffered genetic mutation that would result in enough loss of information from the human genome to lead to its extinction. As pointed out by Sarfati, geneticist Kondrashov showed that the rate of harmful mutations is much larger than previously thought, and the geneticist asked himself, "why aren't we dead 100 times over?" The answer proposed by Sarfati is that we have not been around long enough to deteriorate to lethal levels.
Sarfati points out that, as well known, the single cell which evolves into a human is programed by genetic information received in the mother's cell and the father's sperm which fertilizes that single cell. Science and evolutionist have not been able to show that a single cell that lacks such programing can evolve into a human. Sarfati asks, "Who provided that programing of the human genome?" There has been no other explanation suggestion other than God. Other points that Sarfati excellently discusses include the fact that abundant transitional forms of fossils should exist if evolution were true. Scientists have not been able to discover or explain the lack of these transitional forms. Species of cactus, rodents and other creatures that scientists say supposedly evolved in South America are also found in Africa and those two continents (Africa and South America) are said by scientists to have separated 70 million years before those species supposedly evolved. How can that be? Sarfati understands plate tectonics and explains how that can be if there were an instance of catastrophic plate movement. The separation of the continents may have occurred much less than millions of years or even hundreds of thousands of years ago. Sarfati gives a plausible scientific explanation proposed by a scientist working at Los Alamos National Laboratiories that supports such a catastrophic movement of the plates.
Sarfati gives very supportable, scientific evidence that the earth is possibly not nearly as old as distinguished scientists have assured us that it is. A student of a well know paleontologist at a U.S. university found that dinosaur bones contained red blood cells as well as soft tissue having blood vessels. Studies show that such blood cells and soft tissue could not be preserved for more than 15,000 years. That is far less than the 65 to 80 million years that scientists had previously given for the age of such dinosaurs. Studies on zircons containing radioactive elements that decay to helium also suggest a much younger earth. Helium diffuses from the zircons rapidly enough that any helium left should have disappeared about 100,000 years ago. But helium is still found in zircons which would date the zircons as being 4000 to 7000 years old. Comets lose much of their mass every time they pass the sun (thats why we see their tails). These comets would have disappeared after a few hundred passes and thus could not have been orbiting for millions of years let alone billions of years required for evolution.
Sarfati gives unrefutable evidence that origin of live could not come from an assembly of non-living chemicals. An information processing mechanism is absolutely necessary to produce life. All life is produced by genomes that contain an extremely large amount of information and further means of processing that information. Sarfati asks, how could an assembly of chemicals write its own software, and what mechanism does that assembly of chemicals have to process its self-written software needed to create life?
Sarfati's book should be read by anyone interested at all in evolution versus creation. He provides very firm arguments to counter Dawkins and the evolutionists. Read the book and make up your own mind.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


3 of 8 people found the following review helpful
1.0 out of 5 stars A Desperate Attempt to Undermine Science, May 30, 2014
By 
This review is from: The Greatest Hoax on Earth? Refuting Dawkins on Evolution (Paperback)
It should be enough to just point out the fact that Sarfati works alongside "creation ministries", and therefore has an unreasonably bias and twisted perspective of science; unfortunately the religious could say the same for Dawkin's Atheism. Better known is the fact that nearly 99% of all scientists, in all disciplines accept biological evolution as fact; irrespective of their "spiritual convictions".

In any regards, Whether 9% or 99% of people accept evolution is irrelevant, truth is not a democracy. To deny evolution is the equivalent of denying science in general. Might as well deny medicine, cancer/disease research computer/forensic science, agricultural development, artificial selection, DNA modeling, etc. all of which implore real-life applications involving evolution. (You can't make this stuff up people) Evolution is the basis for all modern biology, and has been tested and verified through thousands of experiments time and time again. It doesn't fail. That IS how it works. That IS part of biology. Biology is science. Are creationists redefining biology? People only deny it because of religious convictions, otherwise they would be forced to accept it. It kills their little "God" hypothesis of creation. So they instead take the easy road out, and follow the pseudo-scientific invention called "creationism" as a lazy cop out to say "God" did it. LOL ... What a joke. How are you going to deny something that has real-life applications? Evolution has been scientifically verified through physics, chemistry, biology, medicine and indeed all disciplines. God hasn't been in the discussion. Comments such as "We didn't evolve from monkeys." and "Evolution is just a theory", among other things is proof of creationist agenda.

It's quite pathetic and yet equally amazing that we living in 2014 as a society still live amongst those who are so blinded by religious convictions as to deny scientific fact such as evolution.

Secondly, a scientific theory is much different than a general theory. Evolution is a scientific theory and the basis for all modern biology. It is backed up by every single scientific discipline there is and by 99% of the scientific community. There is no conspiracy against your religion, it (creationism) just doesn't provide any evidence to support its sensational claims. If you want to believe in supernatural supreme being, and all the fantastic biblical stories, fine by all means go ahead. I have no quarrel with people having faith, but faith =/= fact. I am not going to trust people who only deny evolution because of their religious convictions over the PhD academia/scientists who actually work and study in the field of evolutionary biology. Sarfati is not a biologist, not a geneticist, and does not have the kind of depth to discuss evolutionary biology. I would be surprised if he ever took a course on bioinformatics. When you have a scientist who brings in supernatural mythology into the lab, you're never going to get any results. He would have been better off leaving his beliefs at home, or in church, not try to make science out of it. Even kooky Pat Robertson knows better.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


33 of 61 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars A Refutation that should be considered by all, January 8, 2012
This review is from: The Greatest Hoax on Earth? Refuting Dawkins on Evolution (Paperback)
The book is a fine point by point refutation of Richard Dawkins new book the greatest hoax on earth. The author does a good job of bringing to light the arguments that can brought against the hypothesis which is portrayed as the greatest scientific fact and used to validate the philosophical position of atheism. Many of his statement will, as seen in some reviews, be seen as plain wrong by those who already hold to a differing view on the subject as he brings to mind how the evidence can be viewed from a different perspective and support creation. This however would off course anger those who already feel that their view on the evidence is correct, does this invalidate his position is the majority disagree? off course not. It only means that a evolutionary priori is more popular at present. As many of the reviews that seemingly start with a counter position will indicate, a common use of attacking his credentials and poisoning the well by attempting to discredit the man for daring to be a creationist. This is also combined with some appeals to authority of their own experience on the matter and resorting to straw-man arguments, such as the flood water having to be immense to cover current geology, while the position taken in the book involves a changing geology and models of catastrophism, such as the catastrophic plate tectonics model.

The book however is addressing the arguments of Dawkins as isn't the last word on the issue or all the information creation science has to offer. He however presents a fine rebuttal of Dawkins and present the reader, who is willing, with a interest of finding what the other side to what is commonly heard has to say. He also in my view finds a good balance between writing for the lay-man while including technical details. I suggest you step past the attack on the man for being a creationist and read the book with a investigative mind and decide for yourself on the issue.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


34 of 63 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars Shows it is a Hoax, June 18, 2010
By 
Joshua Brennan (Leonay, NSW Australia) - See all my reviews
This review is from: The Greatest Hoax on Earth? Refuting Dawkins on Evolution (Paperback)
Great to see a book that actually questions some of the claims put forward about evolution. It shows that their are people who question evolution and the reasons why. It shows clearly that many claims on evolution are based on assumptions and not tangible evidence. A must read for anyone who wants to see both sides of the creation and evolution debate.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


‹ Previous | 1 26 | Next ›
Most Helpful First | Newest First

Details

The Greatest Hoax on Earth? Refuting Dawkins on Evolution
The Greatest Hoax on Earth? Refuting Dawkins on Evolution by Jonathan Sarfati PhD (Paperback - March 1, 2010)
$15.00 $12.42
In Stock
Add to cart Add to wishlist
Search these reviews only
Rate and Discover Movies
Send us feedback How can we make Amazon Customer Reviews better for you? Let us know here.