20 of 21 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars
very disappointing, March 2, 2008
What a disappointment! This has to be the weakest entry in what had been an enjoyable series of mysteries featuring Roger the Chapman. The political situation in the summer of 1482, when the story takes place, is presented at the start of the book by that most hackneyed of literary conventions - a traveling stranger in the pub expositing at great detail in the most boring manner imaginable. I felt like I was back in school, listening to my high school teacher drone on. And on. . . and on . . .
There is no literary tension whatsoever - the reason Roger is made part of the English expedition to Scotland was obvious from the very beginning, even to me, thus making the "big reveal" at the end a total ho-hum. The "mystery" Roger investigates doesn't show up until the last quarter of the book, and then consists of simply a few pages in which he talks to a few characters. The rest of the time is merely a description of Roger passively accompanying the Duke of Albany, and where he sleeps and what he eats. Since Roger is hardly given to deep thoughts, and there is no character development at all (we already know he is a big guy, who is very nosy and likes to eat), the complete lack of action makes for a pretty boring read.
In addition to the huge holes in the plot (i.e., Roger accepting a drink from the same people he already suspected had drugged him), the editing is incredibly sloppy. The statement (on p. 207) that, "The groom, John Tullo, was absent, presumably sleeping in the stables . . ." is followed closely (p. 208) by "James Tullo just snored; he had fallen asleep." And no, John does not have a brother named James.
It seems that these books are being produced much more quickly than the earlier (and much, much better) ones. It seems that quality has been sacrificed to quantity, which is a shame for those of us who enjoy good historical mysteries.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
4 of 4 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars
Hardly Rates One Star, July 26, 2008
What has happened to Sedley's most enjoyable series of Roger the Chapman? I would not give this entry even one star. Mainly, the reader must slog through far too much historical background, with the word RESEARCH slowing us down page after page, not to mention a "plot" with barely any investigation, no forward movement, and certainly no tension.
Roger, as a previous reviewer points out, is portrayed as blind to Albany's murderous intentions when they are so obvious to the reader. This is unworthy.
For me, the most startling and off-putting element of this book is the way the Green Man theme is presented. Here is an image from antiquity whose birth-and-renewal meaning (one of many) is degraded by the shallowness of the characters who are so-called believers. The descriptions of "retching" clearly tie to the familiar portrayal of leaves sprouting from the Green Man's mouth - unappealing and not even remotely accurate.
For an appealing guide to this figure, try the fairly recent (2001) Pitkin Guide titled The Green Man - www.britguides.com - an easy to read booklet lavishly illustrated, and with reference to Roslin chapel.
Please, Kate Sedley, better next time?
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
5 of 6 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars
The Green Man, April 27, 2008
I was disappointed in this book. It lacked Sedley's usual humour and the mystery was so predictable that I felt cheated after spending the time to read the book.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No