GG is dead on. PW claims that Greenwald is "just like" Coulter and then provides no examples of how that is remotely true. Coulter blurts out controversial, outrageous statements to sell books; Glen Greenwald meticulously cites and sources each point he makes and somehow the two are supposed to be the same.
Well put David. Assuming that this book carries on in the tradition of Greenwald's blog and his other books, it would be nonsense to assert that he fails to present a reasoned argument. Any attempt to equate his work with Coulter's is nothing but a thinly vailed attack by someone who doesn't like the message.