21 of 26 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
Jesus & Buddha Play a Polite Game of Chess (revised review), December 7, 2000
This review is from: The Ground We Share: Everyday Practice, Buddhist and Christian (Paperback)
Despite its virtues, The Ground We Share is by no means a pioneering or revolutionary work in the area of serious interreligious dialogue. The book is an edited transcript of a week-long retreat that took place in Hawaii, during which Brother David Steindl-Rast, a Benedictine monk, and Robert Aitken-roshi, a Western Zen master, sat down and chewed the religious fat in front of a tape recorder during the early 1990s. It is informative more in the sense that we are privy to an actual verbal dialogue between men of different faiths than in the sense that something revolutionary is happening. (Buddhist-Christian dialogue is not a new field.)
The overarching theme of the discussion was practice, but within that framework the topics ranged from sexuality to student-teacher relationships to everyday morality to philosophy.
Disappointments first: the preface informs us that the morsels of dialogue are no longer in their original order, but were edited with an eye toward subject coherence. It might have been more interesting had the original spontaneity and choppiness of the dialogue been preserved. The book in its present state feels somewhat stilted.
Brother David also proves disappointing in two respects: first, because he has studied Zen under some of the same masters who taught Aitken-roshi, he does not approach the dialogue with a recognizably traditional Christian theology. He happily agrees with most or all of what Aitken-roshi says because he has found his own way of interpreting Christianity in a manner friendly to Zen. While this is laudable in and of itself, it makes for a dialogue between two polite fellows who agree too readily on all topics. I have never read a more conflict-free book, and I wonder to what extent such a book would benefit those Christians whose theological proclivities are more middle-of-the-road than Brother David's.
Brother David's other fault is his volubility. An Austrian by birth, Brother David has carried over into English the germanophonic tendency to speak in long, exhaustive paragraphs. The transcript is dominated by his lengthy discourses, making Aitken-roshi sound at times either meek or uninterested.
The dialogue is occasionally reminiscent of the story of the Zen master who was hosting a philosophy professor. The professor, in an attempt to impress the master, began expounding almost as soon as he entered the master's dwelling. The master, saying nothing, began pouring tea into the professor's cup. As the professor talked, the master continued pouring until the cup began to overflow. Startled, the professor cried, "Stop! No more will go in!", at which point the master said, "So it is with you. If you wish to learn something, first you must empty your cup." Brother David is obviously a learned, well-traveled individual, but I was left with the impression that his cup was full.
Despite these faults, the book is excellent as a study of how decent, civil interreligious dialogue could and should take place. It wasn't exactly a dialogue between equals (the more taciturn Aitken-roshi ends up making the deeper impression), but it produced a clutch of insights worth dwelling upon. For those looking to round out their Zen-Christian reading, I would heartily recommend this book, which also includes a fabulous list of references in the back.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
4 of 7 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
a few insights for the non-christian, April 9, 2005
This review is from: The Ground We Share: Everyday Practice, Buddhist and Christian (Paperback)
The polite game of chess review, described the book very well, and I do agree I wish they had kept the original order. But I would also like to point out that I was intrigued by a few points Brother Steindl-Rast had on Christian theology. Since reading it I have been searching for other sources that would expand on the views he expressed. One that intrigued me is the idea that the crucifiction needs to be seen as more than just a legalistic transer (i.e. my blood for your sins). Many points he made I'd never before heard but they made sense (at least to me) but I was annoyed that he wasn't able to go more in depth. I was left wanting a book on theology by Brother David Steindl-Rast, I've read Listening Heart but he doesn't get into much theology, more philosophy. Of course he has other books, and other authors do exist, so hopefully, eventually I'll find what I'm looking for.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No