Customer Reviews

Growing Up Digital: The Rise of the Net Generation

5 star:		(13)
4 star:		(20)
3 star:		(4)
2 star:		(2)
1 star:		(6)

 

 

In this book, Don Tapscott discusses the differences between the baby boomers (those born between 1946 and 1964) and the "Net Generation" (those born between 1977 and 1997). In Growing up Digital, Tapscott reminds us that boomers consists of 85 million people in the United States and Canada and then informs us that the Net Generation now encompasses 88 million people. So not only are these kids more technologically savvy than the rest of us, they outnumber us also. Tapscott states, "To them the digital technology is no more intimidating than a VCR or toaster. For the first time in history, children are more comfortable, knowledgeable and literate than their parents about an innovation central to society." With this in mind, it is probably a good thing I read this book.

Interestingly, I have two teenage children who fit into the category of Net Generation kids, but who do not have as much in common with the kids described in the book as Tapscott would lead you to believe. The children I know in this age-group are computer literate, do have cyber-dates, are quite capable of multi-tasking, completing research via the net, and ordering products on-line. However, that is where the similarity ends.

Tapscott describes a world where children work for pay creating web sites; expect to be included in the decision-making of major purchases with their parents, (because the children have been able to download the product research that their parents could not), and speak at conferences on the use of technology. I believe there are many instances in the book where Tapscott suggests a behavior that appears more precocious than intelligent. Even given this, the book is very interesting, but at times reads more like science fiction. This is especially true when Tapscott talks about a "cyber Niki" running around the web searching for the best buys or when he gives an example of being able to order his bread from the Stone Mill bakery with just the ingredients he wants. At times, it is hard to tell whether this is currently available via the web or, if it is all part of a future vision.

Because much of the information for this book came from a chat room for teens and pre-teens called "FreeZone" it tends to preclude those children of the same age who are not growing up digital or, who have limited access to this medium. Moreover, if this is so, are we any wiser to the behaviors and thought processes of the majority of American children? I am not so sure. According to Mr. Tapscott we are. He states that, "This book is based on the belief that we can learn much about a whole generation which is in the process of embracing the new media from the children who are most advanced in their adoption of this technology." Maybe he is right, because the information gleaned from this particular group of kids is rather enlightening.

In the book, Tapscott discusses the different ways N-Gens learn, play and work. Supposedly, this group prefers interactive entertainment (video games and web surfing) to passive entertainment (television). In fact, Tapscott estimates that by the year 2000 children will be watching 100 hours less television per year than they were in 1997. Based on discussions with the kids in FreeZone, it appears that N-Gen children prefer to play video games, and spend time on the web because they can control what they see rather than having content pushed at them. Tapscott believes that this is actually good, not bad, as many would have us believe. This is probably true, because in order to navigate the web, you must be able to read and write. In the chapter on N-Gen learning, Tapscott discusses that these children will want to learn in an interactive mode rather than a broadcast mode. One- way to do this would be for these children to discover information on their own via the web instead of listening to lectures. And, when it comes to the work environment, watch out, "Just like the boomers in Michael Dell's company who are perceived as losers if they aren't media-savvy and new-enterprise-comfortable, boomers in the new economy will be left behind as the N-Gen tsunami rolls into the workforce. The message: boomers, get going and learn from the children." According to this, the workplace of the future will be highly technical and if we are not prepared, the N-Gens will leave us behind.

With so many kids already working in technology fields, how should colleges and universities prepare? Well one thing is certain, as long as kids feel the need to go to college to advance within an organization we are okay. The following quote from an 18 year old makes this perfectly clear. He states: "Right now the Internet department is doing some shuffling and I could easily become a full-time employee. My boss loves me and she knows I am more than capable for the help line, but without some kind of college degree I would not go far in the organization. I hope to return in four years." Let us all keep them thinking this way and maybe we can keep our jobs.

Overall, I found this to be an excellent book and feel it may be helpful for many who are dealing with or may soon be dealing with these kids, especially the techno-savvy ones.

Don Tapscott's " Growing Up Digital" starts out as a compelling look into how children growing up in interactive rather than passive medium will change society. However, in order to make his point he resorts to making adults sound slightly stupid and his own child sounding like a mini genius. The major points he makes in his book are good but take too long to develop and are then stated repeatedly. (I got it the first time!) He does manage to help change the perception that many kids are going in Hell in a handbasket, and at the same time makes the point that using the Internet is a positive activity. I am glad that I read the book , but do not plan on picking it up again.

As a long-time net user AND baby boomer, I found much of what Tapscott says completely wrong, be it his unscientific conclusions regarding the so-called "N-Gen" (his own invention, which I find so distasteful and misleading that I'll not use it from now on), his predictions for the future, or his dim view of the technological abilities and intelligence of the boomers.

For example:

1. He assumes that boomers will always remain behind the young when it comes to using the net. There is endless talk of the growing percentage of youthful net users, while ignoring (and thereby discounting) any corresponding growth in boomers using it. He mentions more than once that because youth "assimilated" the net whereas boomers had to learn to use it, youth has an advantage in that respect. (I suppose that some kid raised in a car and thereby "assimilating" how to drive would have a great advantage over all of us dummies who had to learn by taking driver's ed, too.) Now, I don't know how technologically adept or otherwise he might be, and some allowance must be made for the time the book was written (1998), but nowadays I've got news for him: It ain't that hard!!!

2. He stereotypes boomers as being one-dimensional and ignorant; only youth is imaginative, unselfish, open-minded and resourceful. He predicts either a terrible clash between the generations or (in the unlikely event that the boomers wake up in time to cede control to youth) something of a utopia run by the young. It's funny, but a lot of people from that generation that I've encountered hardly fit that profile (and yes, I'm talking about people online)...and I never thought I was all that closed-minded (though I'm sure his advocates would disagree after reading this). Besides, isn't youth traditionally more imaginative, etc., etc.? What proof does he have that this generation won't turn out as all the others have? It's called "growing up." (And I don't mean that it's a 100% good thing!) And he contends that in that generational clash the young will have the advantage, having mastered the greatest tool for mass communication ever: the internet. Evidently the boomers will still be sending telegrams and will thereby be left behind.

3. He mentions that the young have some nebulous advantage in that they espouse so many different points of view, while boomers (there's that stereotyping again) see everything in black and white (I'm not kidding, that's exactly what he says at one point). Not surprisingly, he offers absolutely no proof for either of those assertions. As someone who's spent most of his life finding shades of gray in everything, I think he's confusing the word "different" with "differing," blissfully ignorant of the possibility that all of those contending viewpoints might result in nothing but cacophony.

4. His insights on the young seem to mostly stem from those kids he's spoken with on less than a handful of websites. Evidently he thinks that these websites provide a completely scientific sampling of that generation. Believe me, there ain't no such animal! I'm happy for those sites in that they were frequented by a very nice segment of the younger generation (though even here, some things--like the continuous protestations of teenage males that they would never, ever even think about visiting a porn site--seem somewhat disingenuous, to say the least), but I've been to many sites and participated with many from that generation who, I assure you, were hardly the little angels he's making everyone out to be (and I'm certainly not saying they're all bad, either...but these are rather sweeping generalizations, proof that HE thinks in black and white, anyway).

5. His usual, completely unscientific, means of arriving at a proof of one of his theories is to first introduce it, then to provide some truly scientific though barely related evidence (a chart that shows internet growth or something), and finally to submit a few quotes from his kids to bolster his standpoint. None of this, of course, proves anything, and I'm quite certain that anyone with a professional background in statistical analysis could easily rip his logic to shreds.

6. He sees the net as the road to the truth, and the new generation as particularly discerning of it. Yet everyday I find another hoax in my email, many of them passed on to me by gullible youngsters.

All of which amounts to his own utopian view of youth, a somewhat curmudgeonly distaste for the opinions and abilities of the boomers, and a blatant force-fitting of his transparent opinions (and, in the end, that's all they are) upon the actual, both slimly provided and barely relevant, facts.

It doesn't surprise me at all that younger people have given the book so many positive opinions on here; they're being told what they want to hear. What does surprise me is how few people have seen how poorly constructed his arguments are (regardless of how true or false his conclusions may be). What does that say about the ability of this new generation to discern the truth with a critical eye?

If the proof is in the pudding, keep in mind the year this was published: 1998. That was almost a decade ago (as I write this), long enough for a good part of that generation to come of age, long enough to begin to see some of his sweeping changes, long enough for many of his predictions to have come true. Where are they? People are talking about the book on here as if it were just published and he's showing us the world as it will be 10 years from now. He IS!...only that "10 years from now" is NOW!

Growing Up Digital, is an intellectually stimulating book, that explains the rise of the Net Generation in comparison to the baby boomers. Don Tapscott designed this book to give the reader a real representation of how the Net Generation feels about technological advances. He was able to compare a generation that has grown up with the television, to a generation who is surrounded by this digital technology.

In today's society, children are greatly affected by the Internet and other digital technology. Tapscott goes to great lengths illustrating how this technology plays a role in their daily lives. These children that have access to the information highway are developing socially, intellectually, and cognitively much more rapidly than previous generations. They are being exposed to a communication link that is instant and cheap. For instance, a child can download homework that he/she missed from school or chat with a pen pal from Japan.

Tapscott explained that these web users are not "couch potatoes" but rather interacting with others. Tapscott not only informs the reader about the web users interactions, but also the way in which these "N-Geners" think and communicate with one another.

Don Tapscott has created some intriguing insights, which allow the reader to see the reality of the Net Generation and their advantages socially and intellectually over previous generations. Tapscott leads his readers into the compelling depths of the interactive world. I would definately recommend this book to individuals who are interested in the children of our society today.

Another reviewer called this book a masterwork. Odd indeed. To prove he's a clueless boomer Mr. Tapscott doesnt even include URL's to the few interesting points he makes in the book.

Like Mr. Tapscott apparently many of the parents of these children are techno illiterate. The false conclusion tappie reaches is that this makes the children experts and masters of the technology. By the examples they give, most are merely superficial users of a technology - not creators or shapers of technology.

In summary what can you expect from a book written by a boomer guided by a bunch of teenagers. Find a real teenager to talk to and skip this book.

Tapscott's overview of the Net generation sounds interesting, although some facts make the book very little serious. Fortunately in the country I live you buy Sunday's newspapers on Saturday, so I didn't got much anoyed seeing McGraw-Hill's copyright dated 1998. More serious is the fact that in the book you get statistics as of 1998 and references to 1997 are made as if it were last year. If you are a serious writer you don't need to be worried about the present becoming past before you enoughly enjoy it.

Maybe my expectations were too high based on the reviews. I found most of the information in this book to be news items. Also, anyone that follows technology in the news will not find much insight into this book. The book is an overview of how the younger generation uses technology in their social lives, play and work. If you are not very familiar with the internet and don't watch the news this book would be worthwhile. However, anyone who uses the internet and keeps up on the news won't get much out of it.

A sorry attempt by Tapscott to be the one to coin the term that defines the current generation of children. A good read, and lots of research, but many of the kids *really* don't have a clue what they're talking about.

I had high hopes for this book. I was very disappointed. The only good side to this book is the demographics, but even now I am doubted the validity of those. Tapscott early on tells the reader that this book was a complilation of net users and the internet generation's opinions. Some of the quotes said by the children is hard to imagine. THe quotes are edited entirely, and his opinions on the internet age is too baised. He is looking at the internet as a man who is 100 years old - before the conception of the internet. Don't read if you know something about the internet. Others can read it as a fantasy. In fact, some portions of the book are so far-fetched that would make good comedy at a University lecture for computer majors.

Don Tapscott announces the arrival of the "Net Generation" or "Baby Boom Echo" in Growing Up Digital: The Rise Of The Net Generation. For the first time in history the generations are turned backwards. The children truly teach their parents and grandparents. Businesses, schools, and governments all are relying on the expertise and ease with which this generation adapts to technology; that is, if these young people are part of the economically advantaged - those with the means to have technology available in their schools, homes, and entertainment venues. Tapscott contends that the net-generation is actually more active than the tv generation. Since tv is passive, it allows for little or no participation. The net, however, requires searching for information rather than just accepting others information. In this book, Tapscott outlines ten themes: fierce independence; emotional and intellectual openness; inclusion; free expression and strong views; innovation; preoccupation with maturity; investigation; immediacy; sensitivity to corporate interest; and authentication and trust. For the most part, he outlines the advantages of each of these themes. Below find his ideas marked with an asterisk. The ideas without asterisk are arguments he fails to emphasize or note. 1. Fierce Independence Advantage: Active role in learning* Disadvantage: Separation from institutions and creative autonomy* 2. Emotional and Intellectual Openness Advantage: Self-expression* Disadvantage: Can be taken advantage of by unscrupulous entities 3. Inclusion Advantage: Students have a global orientation* Disadvantage: None apparent 4. Free Expression and Strong Views Advantage: Range of ideas* Disadvantage: Exposure to radical or inflammatory ideas 5. Innovation Advantage: Creativity* Disadvantage: Overload of ideas 6. Preoccupation With Maturity Advantage: Writing skills advanced to make it seem they're older.* Disadvantage: Predators 7. Investigation Advantage: Strong ethos of curiosity, investigation, and empowerment to change things.* Disadvantage: Exposure to too wide a range of information 8. Immediacy Advantage: Light speed* Disadvantage: Deemphasizes long-term goals, fosters impatience 9. Sensitivity to Corporate Interest Advantage: Makes them wary of intentions* Disadvantage: Lack of Trust 10. Authentication and Trust Advantage: Makes child aware of rumors and inaccurate information* Disadvantage: Knowing it's impossible to guarantee truth*

Tapscott also addresses "The Digital Divide": the inequality of access to the internet. He points out that schools in wealthier communities are more likely to have internet access, and that access alone is not enough. Teacher training and increased community access are among his suggestions for improvement. Growing Up Digital: The Rise of the Net Generation deals with many of the concerns and the joys of the new age. For the most part, it gives fair evaluations of its themes. The inclusion of many personal examples helps the reader through the maze of the new technology. Charts which spell out everything from "Cyber Smileys" to internet availability in schools helps the reader visualize the information. The notes and bibliography are an aide to anyone wanting to follow up and/or to present inservice information. The best about the book is that it clarifies and puts into perspective the change that has overwhelmed most educators. It takes away the mystery and fear that have paralyzed some adults. At best, it trains a few teachers to pass the information and spirit along. At worst, it passes over many of the dangers inherent in its freedom and trivializes privacy rights anf parents' right to know what is being taught.