Buy Used
Used - Very Good See details
$3.21 & eligible for FREE Super Saver Shipping on orders over $25. Details

or
Sign in to turn on 1-Click ordering.
 
   
Have one to sell? Sell yours here
Guidelines for Bias-Free Writing
 
 
Tell the Publisher!
I'd like to read this book on Kindle

Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.

Guidelines for Bias-Free Writing [Paperback]

Marilyn Schwartz (Author), Task Force on Bias-Free Language of the (Author)
2.4 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (5 customer reviews)


Available from these sellers.


Textbook Student FREE Two-Day Shipping for Students. Learn more

Formats

Amazon Price New from Used from
Hardcover --  
Paperback --  

Editorial Reviews

From Library Journal

This style sheet for politically correct writing covers gender, age, sexual orientation, disabilities and medical conditions, race, ethnicity, citizenship, nationality, and religion. Gender gets almost half the manual, which addresses but does not cure the most frequent complaints of gender-neutral prose-that the effort to neuter text often creates a hackneyed effect. The examples cited of gender-biased writing are, in some cases, simply bad writing, but the Task Force's point is made. The sections on sexual orientation and on citizenship and nationality may well become dated as political and cultural norms shift. In total, most modern writing books recognize and address the style issues raised here, but these guidelines are not only current and concise but promote consciousness-raising.
Robert Moore, Information Svcs., Dupont Merck Pharmaceuticals, North Billerica, Mass.
Copyright 1995 Reed Business Information, Inc.

From Booklist

This guide is a product of the Task Force on Bias-Free Language of the Association of American University Presses. Concepts are presented in separate, numbered paragraphs similar to familiar style guides such as Turabian's Manual for Writers. Boxed examples of text, mostly drawn from university-press books and manuscripts, exemplify disparaging, exclusive, or otherwise incorrect usage.

The chapter "Gender" is the longest, comprising nearly half the book. Much attention is devoted to finding elegant and practical alternatives to the generic use of man, its compounds, and the generic he. The most controversial alternative will probably be the use of their in informal communication ("Everyone has to carry their own luggage" ). Other gender issues addressed include the trivializing effects of gender-marked terms such as feminine suffixes (waitress), idioms and figures of speech that are now considered sexist ("old wives' tale" ), and the problem of quoting historical sources that use sexist language.

The ensuing chapters are shorter. The chapter on race and ethnicity includes a glossary listing preferred terms (Muslim over Moslem), and offers guidelines for negotiating the differences among such terms as Native American, American Indian, native peoples, native Indian, and Metis. The chapter "Disabilities and Medical Conditions" includes a discussion of the difference between disability and handicap, the appropriate use of the word "normal," and the necessity of avoiding the use of disability as metaphor in such phrases as "blind to the truth." "Sexual Orientation" tackles heterosexism and appropriate terminology, including terms for partners in a homosexual or heterosexual couple. Age, just three pages in length, sets an age limit of 13 or 14 for use of boy or girl and suggests using youth for ages 13 to 19. Older person is now preferable to senior citizen or elderly person.

A bibliography lists guidelines issued by other organizations (AARP, the National Easter Seal Society), citations to sections of standard style manuals that deal with bias-free writing, and dictionaries of problematic terms such as the Bias-Free Word Finder (Beacon, 1991). An index leads readers to discussions of specific terms and such concepts as ethnocentricism or quoting.

Writers will appreciate the common sense with which the task force approaches bias-free writing. The authors caution against embracing such popular terms as differently abled or physically challenged because they may seem euphemistic. Some writers may feel constrained by stylistic directives such as those against "semantic choices attributing agency to men and passivity to women." The errors in some of the sentences illustrating these concepts are so subtle that they may not be immediately apparent. In another sensitive area, the task force cautions authors against acknowledgments that stereotype or trivialize the contributions of women to the finished work, including diligent typing.

While Guidelines for Bias-Free Writing is entirely satisfactory as a reference that can be consulted for advice about a specific term or situation, it will be most valuable to those who spend the time to read it cover to cover. Fortunately, reading it is a painless exercise. Like Strunk and White's Elements of Style, the book is entertaining and enlightening. Recommended for academic and public libraries. --This text refers to an out of print or unavailable edition of this title.


Product Details

  • Paperback: 100 pages
  • Publisher: Indiana University Press (February 1995)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 0253209412
  • ISBN-13: 978-0253209412
  • Product Dimensions: 8 x 5.4 x 0.4 inches
  • Shipping Weight: 6.1 ounces
  • Average Customer Review: 2.4 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (5 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #2,449,481 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

More About the Author

Discover books, learn about writers, read author blogs, and more.

 

Customer Reviews

5 Reviews
5 star:
 (1)
4 star:
 (1)
3 star:    (0)
2 star:    (0)
1 star:
 (3)
 
 
 
 
 
Average Customer Review
2.4 out of 5 stars (5 customer reviews)
 
 
 
 
Share your thoughts with other customers:
Most Helpful Customer Reviews

1.0 out of 5 stars An unbiased review, November 26, 2011
This review is from: Guidelines for Bias-Free Writing (Paperback)
"The pharisaical, malefic, and incognitant 'Guidelines' is a product of the pointy-headed wowsers at the Association of American University Presses, who, in 1987, established a 'Task Force' on bias free language filled with cranks, pokenoses, blow-hards, four-flushers, and pettifogs. The foolish and contemptible product of this seven years wasted in mining the shafts of indignation has been published by that cow-besieged, basketball-sotted sleep-away camp for hick bourgeois offspring, Indiana University, under the aegis of its University Press - a traditional dumping ground for academic deadwood so bereft of talent, intelligence, and endeavor as to be useless even in the dull precincts of Midwestern state college classrooms.

"...the Task Force seems to be nothing but a rat bag of shoddy pedagogues, athletes of the tongue, professional pick-nits filling the stupid hours of their pointless days with nagging the yellow-bellied editors of University Presses which print volume after volume of bound bum-wad fated to sit unread in college library stacks until the sun expires.... There they are, in a stuffy seminar room in some inconvenient corner of the campus, with unwashed hair, Wal-Mart blue jeans, batik print tent dresses, and off-brand running shoes, the synthetic fibers from their fake Aran Island sweaters pilling at the elbows while they give each other high fives. 'Behold "Guidelines" ye Euro-centric, male-dominated power structure, and despair!'"

P.J. O'Rourke
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


5 of 9 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars 1984, August 14, 2005
By 
I read this and am reminded of 1984. The tortured arrival at a non offensive language, suggestions for such to writers, is repulsive.

This is intellectual vandalism. Works of literature are not vehicles for consciousness raising unless that is the subject.

Something about this makes me wonder if the writer has gotten on a narrow path, obsessive in nature, and cannot simply do her job.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


1 of 4 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars Useful, August 19, 2008
This review is from: Guidelines for Bias-Free Writing (Paperback)
I've used this book and found it helpful in choosing terminology that is respectful of all people yet still conveys accurate information (in fact, intentionally respectful language typically conveys *more* accurate information than the conventional terms it replaces--a prime example being "retard," which, to my amazement, I still see and hear). I would suggest ignoring the reader reviews that seem driven by a knee-jerk response against the supposed scourge of "political correctness." Part of what I value in freedom of speech is the freedom to be both respectful and accurate in the way I write, and this book is a useful tool in that effort.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No

Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
 
 
 
Most Recent Customer Reviews



Only search this product's reviews



Tag this product

 (What's this?)
Think of a tag as a keyword or label you consider is strongly related to this product.
Tags will help all customers organize and find favorite items.
Your tags: Add your first tag
 

Sell a Digital Version of This Book in the Kindle Store

If you are a publisher or author and hold the digital rights to a book, you can sell a digital version of it in our Kindle Store. Learn more

Customer Discussions

This product's forum
Discussion Replies Latest Post
No discussions yet

Ask questions, Share opinions, Gain insight
Start a new discussion
Topic:
First post:
Prompts for sign-in
 


Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
Search all Amazon discussions
   
Related forums


Listmania!


Create a Listmania! list

So You'd Like to...


Create a guide


Look for Similar Items by Category


Look for Similar Items by Subject