Customer Reviews

Gun Digest 2007

5 star:		(4)
4 star:		(1)
3 star:		(1)
2 star:		(1)
1 star:		(3)

 

 

Gun Digest has been going down hill every year since it sold out to new owners back around 1999. This year is a new low. Very few articles and many errors in the canned specs.

After the depressingly poor content of the Gun Digest 60th edition (2006), I had decided to not purchase the 61st edition. However, I did anyway. I was surprised to find that it was a definite improvement over the 2006 edition. While not nearly up to the standards of the pre-Ken Ramage administration (why is he still there?), it did have several interesting articles, the most enjoyable of which (to me) were those on the Remington Rolling Block rifle and the .38-44 Smith and Wesson Outdoorsman. At least this time, Ramage demonstrated good sense by not having any more knife articles, as he did the last time. There was one "foul ball" article entitled "The AuVer System" that was total garbage and has no place in any gun publication. Aside from that, the rest of the edition was at least readable and somewhat interesting, if not up to the high standards of the editions published under the late John Amber's editorial direction. Again, this edition is published in full color and on slick paper. All that does is run up the production cost. I'd far rather see interesting articles, and the money should be spent there than on cosmetics. Therefore, I'm giving the 61st edition 3 stars. At least, that's enough to get me to buy the 62nd edition when it is published.

Gun Digest 2007
Edited by Ken Ramage

Handgus 2007
Edited by Ken Ramage

What can I say?
They don't make them like they used to.
This is not your father's gun digest.

It has been a long time since I bought a Gun Digest but I am about to retire and I want to revive my interest in shooting spoorts. My primary interest is target shooting with handguns.

I expected to catch up on all the new stuff and read dozens of interesting articles and see all the new models and perhaps some fondly remembered old ones.

Well, they don't make them like they used to.
I was severely disappointed. Only 17 articles total. Many of them historical. The ones that are not historical tend to have long, boring, historical introductions.

The Photography is absolutely beautiful. If you are interested in beautiful pictures of beautiful guns, buy the Gun Digest. If you are looking for information about guns, shooting, or hunting, stick to your regular magaziine subscriptions.

If you are interested in handguns, Handguns 2007 is worth the money but just barely. It does not have the slick paper photography but it does have 21 articles. Still a lot of boring historical stuff about how one company morphed into another 75 years ago but a decent amount of real information.

The catalog portion is a disappointment, it is neither organized or comlete. There are photos of guns with no descriptions and descriptions of guns with no photos. There are manufacturers who are not represented at all.


Summary:
If you are interested in handguns, buy Handguns 2007 only.

If you are interested in beautiful pictures of guns, buy the Gun Digest 2007.

If you haven't seen one on quite a while be prepared for a disapointment.

Can't wait till the 2008 issue comes out to see how much further you can go to destroy what used to be an excellent publication. No articles, canned content, and errors abound in this publication. Was going to give it 2 stars so I have the ability to downgrade if next years digest gets any worse.

I was pleasently surprised when I opened my 2007 edition. It abounds with interesting articles. Tops and lead in this issue was an excellent piece from John Malloy, renowned author of many top notch articles on guns and gun history. He takes you through 60 years of the automatic pistol in the US and neatly ties it into the 60 years of the Gun Digest. I found this year's other articles both very intersting and informative. Those that downplay this years edition either haven't read it, or don't appreciate it. I've given it 5 stars to counteract the insultingly low ratings. I have collected the entire gun digest library starting with the 1944 edition and have read through many volumes of the library. I believe that this qualifies me to speak about the entire body of work that is Gun Digest. I can honestly say that this issue is certainly not one of the worst and would be ranked as a refreshing change from those of the recent past. Get it for the articles, and enjoy it until next year. Ken Ramage and the GD team have made an effort. That says alot in this day and age and I believe that you won't be disappointed - do yourself a favor though, and this goes for any book. Don't pay anywhere close to retail price. You should be able to get this one brand new for around 15 bucks - delivered as of the date of this review!

Amazon.com is the most convenient and cost effective way to buy gun digests. They arrive in very good condition and I never have been unhappy at all.
HP

This years gun digest has many color pictures, unlike previous editions.
It hepled to see the colors. This annual edition still meets with "Gun Digest" usual value, both in the articles, and the price lists.

I was not as pleased with this addition as past issues.It lacked the type articals and stories that I have enjoyed in the past.

Ken Ramage edits the 61st updated edition of GUN DIGEST 2007, providing and updating the latest in firearms data. Gun digest has been produced since 1944, and this compiles and synthesizes all kinds of details for the shooting sportsmen, gathering reports from the field, details on prices and caliber, collector's information, and pairing all with small black and white photos. The new gun collector's guides reports and feature reports can't be beat.

Diane C. Donovan
California Bookwatch

Gun Digest is top shelf for gun afficiandos and this issue is no exception.